[go: nahoru, domu]
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 June 1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 31 June 2 >

June 1

[edit]

Template:15TeamBracket-NoSeed

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by {{15TeamBracket|seeds=n}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 22:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:4TeamBracket-No Finals

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by {{4TeamBracket|maxround=1}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:4TeamBracket-PACC5

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by {{4TeamBracket|legs=5/1}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:4TeamBracket-PACC3

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by {{4TeamBracket|legs=3/1}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:59, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FRAint

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to be an abandoned experiment from 2017 with generic documentation copied from {{Jctint}} or similar. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LKL Finals

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All of these links are included in the more comprehensive {{LKL}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:56, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EFloras/label

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The functions provided by these subpages appear to have been replaced by Module:EFloras and Module:EFloras/data. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox road/maint/CRI

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-templates of Template:Infobox road which are no longer needed. Gonnym (talk) 15:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:D&D/importance

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Parent page was moved in 2010, and {{WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons/importance}} appears to be working fine without this page being a redirect. Delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cratstats/Style

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. There are a few incoming links from discussion pages in 2008 and 2009, but this subpage does not appear to have been adopted, or it was used for a while and then abandoned. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:28, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coursecoordinatorgiven

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. No longer usable, after the education program was shut down and this user right was disabled. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brick chart/strmul

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. Does not appear to be used in any template code. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:19, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022 ACA Lightweight Grand Prix

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions; created in February 2022. This appears to be single-article content that is being maintained within 2022 in Absolute Championship Akhmat. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:02, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Munakata Sanix Blues squad

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:19, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Munakata Sanix Blues have been disbanded as a team and no longer complete, meaning a squad template is no longer needed. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 12:37, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jesse Ventura

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:18, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Three links to articles. And one redirect to the main subject. Fails NENAN. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Diplomatic missions of the United Kingdom

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 14:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Diplomatic missions of the United Kingdom with Template:Foreign relations of the United Kingdom.
The two templates currently represent the same thing, its best having a single template to reuse across articles related to Foreign relations of the United Kingdom. The best template would be Template:Foreign relations of the United Kingdom. DownTownRich (talk) 17:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose merge. The two are plainly different topics; one template (the one on "Diplomatic missions") should cover the buildings used by embassies and consulates, while the other (the one on the foreign relations) should focus on foreign relations. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 04:57, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Is country an EU member state and three similar templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2018 (EU member state) and 2020 (the other three). I asked the creator if they planned to use it, but I received no response. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm a big fan of Chesterton's fence. I'd like to understand the purpose these are intended to serve before deleting them. BD2412 T 06:29, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    That is why I asked the creator for help, but in any event, Chesterton's fence does not appear to be analogous here. Chesterton puts the burden of proof on the TFD nominator, whereas our process puts the burden on those who would use the template. {{Is country in the Caribbean}} was created at about the same time and is used on category pages. That might help you understand these templates' purpose. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I think our process does put the burden on the nominator, as consensus is required to change the status quo. That a template is unused does not signify that there is not a possible use for it. BD2412 T 06:28, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:46, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The status quo is that these templates are unused, and nobody, including the creator of the templates, who is a very active editor, has offered a potential use for these templates. The normal outcome in such a case is to delete, I believe. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:13, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SBB color

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Berlin S-Bahn. Gonnym (talk) 08:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RB song note

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem to be used in any of the Rock Band song lists (List of songs in Rock Band 2, etc.). Gonnym (talk) 08:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_June_1&oldid=1092310712"