[go: nahoru, domu]

Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Project overviewTasksCurationGuidesAwardsOur classicistsTalk page

Questions about Quintus Sertorius, again

[edit]

Hello all. It is the same, less new editor who made the previous post checking in again about the Quintus Sertorius article. In the week since the first post, I've been working with others to revamp it up to par (still aiming for GA!), and to that end I would like to thank (but not ping, lest it bother them) Ifly6, T8612, and TheUndercoverClassicist for their help in myriad things. Ifly6 in particular regarding matters of formatting and cleanup, and TheUndercoverClassicist for help regarding the page image.

I would like feedback on the article as it exists now. I believe we have come a long way, but more work remains to be done. Formatting, as always (lots of references to be sfn'fied). I am of the opinion the Sertorian War section can still be shortened, and I am also inclined to say some details might be superfluous. Although the quality of sourcing of the article has greatly increased, I am sure more can be added. My major concern is the prose, which I feel I cannot evaluate in an unbiased manner, may be too obstructive or formal for summary style. But at the same time, any reading about Quintus Sertorius, an otherwise obscure figure in Roman history, are probably quite interested in classics and may be able to bypass said prose.

I appreciate all feedback on this, particularly improvements (both specific and general) to make it reach GA status. Harren the Red (talk) 22:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An explanation of domi nobiles would be helpful, possibly as part of nobiles. TSventon (talk) 15:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments at Talk:Greek love welcome. Johnbod (talk) 13:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Battle of the Yarmuk

[edit]

Battle of the Yarmuk has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:17, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Battle of Plataea

[edit]

Battle of Plataea has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]