Talk:Dobie Center

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Texas / Austin Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas - Austin (assessed as Low-importance).

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

From memory (for what that's worth):

The tower used to have a brick facade, replaced in 1989.

During the replacement, a large portion of the facade fell from the building, causing damage but no casualties.
The old facade was found to contain a toxic adhesive (also found in souvenir pieces of the Berlin Wall, which was being dismantled around the same time)
When the renovations weren't completed by the start of the next academic year, some residents were relocated to local hotels, such as the Driskill.

Some academic departments had offices (if not classrooms?) in the Dobie Center, presumably due to lack of space at the University.

-- Gyrofrog (talk) 15:42, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ben - why do you keep editing the page and/or having someone edit it to have the sexual assault from five years ago added? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cschelltx (talk • contribs) 17:44, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - I don't think the sexual assault should be mentioned per WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:UNDUE. Wikipedia is not a compendium of every building in which a sexual assault has ever taken place in. That the article on the UT Tower does not mention sexual assaults does not mean they have not taken place there, that the article on the Texas State Capitol does not mention sexual assaults does not mean they have not taken place there, and that this article on Dobie Center does not mention sexual assaults does not mean they have not taken place there. And if anyone feels particularly motivated to discuss it, here's an idea: see how many instances of sexual assault have been reported at Dobie Center since it was built and compare the resultant percentage to the percentage for Austin for the same period. Maybe compare it to other Austin venues, as well, and then write a letter to the editor of the Austin American Statesman about it. The resulting press that that receives may warrant an addition to the article. As yet, however, no such addition is justified 129.116.66.226 (talk) 16:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.116.12.67 (talk) [reply]

- Also, I believe the edits in question are in violation of WP:SOAPBOX. The victim has my sympathies but that still doesn't make the assault notable enough to merit mentioning Exactmaybe (talk) 06:57, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Chip - i have every reason to believe i know who it was but they deny that it was them - not sure if I'll ever figure it out completely but this person should not do this again. Obviously there is a lot of stuff that happens at all of our properties -- I am not sure why they chose to bring up news from a half decade ago but I'll do whatever I can to make sure it won't happen again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben123321q (talk • contribs) 23:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dobie Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dobie Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]