Talk:Falcon 9

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Falcon 9 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 180 days

Spaceflight: SpaceX working group High‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by SpaceX working group.

Rocketry Top‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	The topic of this article is rocket.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Partial failures" metric

The summary box still shows only one partial failure (Partial failure(s) 1 (v1.0: CRS-1)[9]), however, another "partial failure" is Transporter 6 mission. Also, Zuma mission's outcome remains unknown, so maybe it is reasonable to have additional metric "outcome unknown"? 207.102.27.181 (talk) 20:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@207.102.27.181 King Ali Aljanabi monuiy 2A02:AA7:460F:1129:1:1:1C6B:3E0F (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zuma wasn't a failure of Falcon 9, and I don't know of any issue with Transporter 6. Redacted II (talk) 12:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Large specification change without supporting reference

This page previously listed specifications which were the same as those on the Falcon Heavy page, which are at least supported by a (broken) reference link.

These were replaced with substantially different numbers for EG 2nd stage propellant. There appears to be absolutely no citation for the new numbers. (Am I missing something?)

Addtionally, diameter was previously listed correctly as 3.66m, and has now been "improved" to 3.7m.

What is the justification for such a large change to the specifications without support by link to a reference source? MP99 (talk) 12:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting this - the ~93t prop figure is for a very old version of F9US according to this:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220406013729/https://www.spacelaunchreport.com/falcon9ft.html MP99 (talk) 19:38, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to post the same link.

ISTM the previous version needs to be reverted, as it is clearly closer to the true values.

Thanks. MP99 (talk) 12:22, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Add A Fact: "California rejects increase in SpaceX launches"

I found a fact that might belong in this article. See the quote below

The Space Force had sought to increase the number of launches of SpaceX’s flagship Falcon 9 rocket from 36 to 50 per year out of California. But on Thursday, the California Coastal Commission denied the bid in a 6-4 vote, pointing to its previous requests for the military and SpaceX to mitigate the disruptive sonic booms caused by the rockets and to keep a closer eye on the operations’ effects on the state’s wildlife.

The fact comes from the following source:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/12/us/spacex-launch-california.html

This post was generated using the Add A Fact browser extension.

TJMSmith (talk) 16:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong launch tally

As of November 4 the total launch tally says 390 but shouldn't it be 388? 2010: 2, 2012: 2, 2013: 3, 2014: 6, 2015: 7, 2016: 8, 2017: 18, 2018: 20, 2019: 11, 2020: 26, 2021: 31, 2022: 60, 2023: 91, 2024: 103 (so far)

That's 388 in total. Am I missing something? Lomicto (talk) 01:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]