Talk:Fox News/Archive 38
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Fox News. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 |
Semi-protected edit request on 22 May 2020
 | This edit request to Fox News has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
FoxNews actually has NO political affiliation and has shown NO bias toward any candidate. The current version incorrectly states these things and makes numerous false claims about their stories. Using such bias "sources" as mediamatters, the Daily Beast (an obvious tabloid), The Washington Post and New York Times and Politico (ALL competitors of FoxNews and notorious for being left-leaning) and random users is not responsible; and shows a bias on Wikipedia's part. This is like describing CNN, MSNBC, ABC News, etc..., using Breitbart.com's opinions on them. As I said, the proposed changes would eliminate the glaring bias and lies, being currently displayed on the page.
I may have missed some; but these changes would put the page as being encyclopediac, rather than opinion. Having pages that describe people and things in a bias way goes against Wikipedia.org's written rule about being neutral. For example, even though I view various news outlets (including FoxNews) as having a left-leaning bias, it would betray a stance of neutrality to list them as such.
| 100,000 characters hatted. Improper method of requesting changes O3000 (talk) |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Current: Fox News From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Fox news) Jump to navigationJump to search For other uses, see Fox News (disambiguation). Fox News Channel Fox News Channel logo.svg Launched October 7, 1996; 23 years ago Owned by Fox Corporation Picture format 720p HDTV (downscaled to letterboxed 480i for the SDTV feed) Country United States Language English Broadcast area United States Headquarters 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York City, NY, U.S. 10036 Sister channel(s) Fox Business Network Fox Broadcasting Company Website www.foxnews.com Availability Satellite DirecTV Channel 360 (SD/HD) Dish Network Channel 205 (SD/HD) Bell TV (Canada) Channel 507 Shaw Direct (Canada) Channel 154 Channel 503 Foxtel (Australia) Channel 604 SKY TV (New Zealand) Channel 088 Sky Italia Channel 514 Digital+ Channel 77 MEO (Portugal) Channel 208 Cignal (Philippines) Channel 131 OSN Channel 411 beIN Channel 147 (HD) Oi TV (Brazil) Channel 184 Movistar TV (Chile) Channel 734 G Sat (Philippines) Channel 50 Cable Available on most US providers Channel slots vary on each operator Cablevisión (Argentina) Channel 552 (Digital) Macau Cable TV (Macau) Channel 816 Cable TV Hong Kong (Hong Kong) Channel 123 Movistar TV (Peru) Channel 548 SkyCable (Philippines) Channel 138 Nationwide: Channel 510 Izzi Telecom (Mexico) Channel 180 Satellite radio Sirius Channel 114 XM Channel 115 IPTV Verizon FiOS Channel 118 (SD) Channel 618 (HD) Bell Fibe TV (Canada) Channel 507 VMedia (Canada) Channel 181 Optik TV Channel 811 (HD; East) Channel 9811 (SD; West) now TV (Hong Kong) Channel 318 Singtel TV (Singapore) Channel 165 StarHub TV (Singapore) Channel 702 Streaming media foxnewsgo.com Live simulcast (Pay-TV subscribers only) fuboTV Live Stream This article is part of a series on Conservatism in the United States Collage of nine American conservatives: Ronald Reagan, Calvin Coolidge, Barry Goldwater, William F. Buckley Jr., Jack Kemp, Milton Friedman, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito About this image Schools[show] Principles[show] History[show] People[show] Parties[show] Think tanks[show] Other organizations[show] Media[show] Variants and movements[show] See also[show] DodgerBlue flag waving.svg Conservatism portal vte Fox News (officially Fox News Channel, abbreviated FNC and commonly known as Fox) is an American conservative[1][2] cable television news channel. It is owned by Fox News Media, which itself is owned by the Fox Corporation. The channel broadcasts primarily from studios at 1211 Avenue of the Americas in New York City. Fox News provides service to 86 countries and overseas territories worldwide,[3] with international broadcasts featuring Fox Extra segments during ad breaks. The channel was created by Australian-American media mogul Rupert Murdoch to appeal to a conservative audience, hiring former Republican media consultant and CNBC executive Roger Ailes as its founding CEO.[4][5] It launched on October 7, 1996, to 17 million cable subscribers.[6] Fox News grew during the late 1990s and 2000s to become the dominant subscription news network in the U.S.[7] As of September 2018, approximately 87,118,000 US households (90.8% of television subscribers) received Fox News.[8] In 2019, Fox News was the top-rated cable network, averaging 2.5 million viewers.[9][10][11] Murdoch is the current executive chairman and Suzanne Scott is the CEO.[12][13] Fox News has been described as practicing biased reporting in favor of the Republican Party, the George W. Bush and Donald Trump administrations, and conservative causes.
Subsequently, and prior to founding FNC, Murdoch had gained experience in the 24-hour news business when News Corporation's BSkyB subsidiary began Europe's first 24-hour news channel (Sky News) in the United Kingdom in 1989.[17] With the success of his fourth network efforts in the United States,[18] experience gained from Sky News and the turnaround of 20th Century Fox, Murdoch announced on January 31, 1996, that News Corp. would launch a 24-hour news channel on cable and satellite systems in the United States as part of a News Corp. "worldwide platform" for Fox programming: "The appetite for news – particularly news that explains to people how it affects them – is expanding enormously".[19] In February 1996, after former U.S. Republican Party political strategist and NBC executive[20] Roger Ailes left cable television channel America's Talking (now MSNBC), Murdoch asked him to start Fox News Channel. Ailes demanded five months of 14-hour workdays and several weeks of rehearsal shows before its launch on October 7, 1996.[21] At its debut 17 million households were able to watch FNC;[6] however, it was absent from the media markets of New York City and Los Angeles. Rolling news coverage during the day consisted of 20-minute single-topic shows such as Fox on Crime or Fox on Politics, surrounded by news headlines. Interviews featured facts at the bottom of the screen about the topic or the guest. The flagship newscast at the time was The Schneider Report, with Mike Schneider's fast-paced delivery of the news. During the evening, Fox featured opinion shows: The O'Reilly Report (later The O'Reilly Factor), The Crier Report (hosted by Catherine Crier) and Hannity & Colmes. From the beginning, FNC has placed heavy emphasis on visual presentation. Graphics were designed to be colorful and gain attention; this helped the viewer to grasp the main points of what was being said, even if they could not hear the host (with on-screen text summarizing the position of the interviewer or speaker, and "bullet points" when a host was delivering commentary). Fox News also created the "Fox News Alert", which interrupted its regular programming when a breaking news story occurred.
During the September 11, 2001 attacks, Fox News was the first news organization to run a news ticker on the bottom of the screen to keep up with the flow of information that day. The ticker has remained, informing viewers about additional news which reporters may not mention on-screen and repeating news mentioned during a broadcast; it has proven popular with viewers.[25] Political alignment Fox News has been described as practicing biased reporting in favor of the Republican Party, the George W. Bush and Donald Trump administrations, and conservative causes while portraying the Democratic Party in a negative light.[26][27][28][29] Critics have cited the channel as detrimental to the integrity of news overall.[30][31] Fox News employees have said that news reporting operates independently of its opinion and commentary programming, and have denied bias in news reporting, while former employees have said that Fox ordered them to "slant the news in favor of conservatives".[32] During Trump's presidency, observers have noted a pronounced tendency of the Fox News Channel to serve as a "mouthpiece" for the administration, providing "propaganda" and a "feedback loop" for Trump, with one presidential scholar stating, "It’s the closest we’ve come to having state TV."[33][34][35][36][37] Outlets Fox News airport newsstand FNC airport newsstand at Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport Television news studio FNC's newsroom, November 15, 2007. FNC maintains an archive of most of its programs. This archive also includes Movietone News series of newsreels from its now Disney-owned namesake movie studio, 20th Century Fox. Licensing for the Fox News archive is handled by ITN Source, the archiving division of ITN.[38] Television Main article: List of programs broadcast by Fox News Channel FNC presents a variety of programming, with up to 15 hours of live broadcasting per day in addition to programming and content for the Fox Broadcasting Company. Most programs are broadcast from Fox News headquarters in New York City (at 1211 Avenue of the Americas), in its streetside studio on Sixth Avenue in the west wing of Rockefeller Center, sharing its headquarters with sister channel Fox Business Network. Fox News Channel has eight studios at its New York City headquarters that are used for its and Fox Business' programming: Studio B (used for Fox Business programming), Studio D (which has an area for studio audiences; and is used by The Greg Gutfeld Show, Fox and Friends First), Studio F (used for The Story with Martha MacCallum, The Five, and America's Election Headquarters, Fox and Friends, Outnumbered, Outnumbered Overtime, America's News HQ, Justice with Judge Jeanine) Studio G (which houses Fox Business shows), Studio H (Fox News Deck used for Shepard Smith Reporting and breaking news coverage), Studio J (used for America's Newsroom, Hannity and Justice with Judge Jeanine) Starting in 2018, Thursday Night Football had its pregame show, Fox NFL Thursday, originating from the Fox News studio. The remaining programs (such as Tucker Carlson Tonight, Special Report with Bret Baier, The Ingraham Angle, Fox News @ Night, and editions of America's News HQ not broadcast from the New York City studios) are broadcast from Fox News's Washington, D.C. studios, located on Capitol Hill across from Union Station in a secured building shared by a number of other television networks (including NBC News and C-SPAN). Audio simulcasts of the channel are aired on XM Satellite Radio and Sirius Satellite Radio. In an October 11, 2009, in a New York Times article, Fox said its hard-news programming runs from "9 a.m. to 4 p.m. and 6 to 8 p.m. on weekdays". However, it makes no such claims for its other broadcasts, which primarily consist of editorial journalism and commentary.[39] Fox News Channel began broadcasting in the 720p resolution format on May 1, 2008.[40] This format is available on all major cable and satellite providers. The Fox News Group produces Fox News Sunday, which airs on Fox Broadcasting and re-airs on FNC. Fox News also produces occasional special event coverage that is broadcast on FBC. Radio Main article: Fox News Radio With the growth of the FNC, the company introduced a radio division, Fox News Radio, in 2003.[41] Syndicated throughout the United States, the division provides short newscasts and talk radio programs featuring personalities from the television and radio divisions. In 2006, the company also introduced Fox News Talk, a satellite radio station featuring programs syndicated by (and featuring) Fox News personalities. Online Introduced in December 1995,[42] the Fox News website features the latest coverage, including columns by FNC television, radio and online personalities. Video clips are also available on Foxnews.com and Foxbusiness.com. Fox News Latino is the version aimed at the Hispanic audience, although presented almost entirely in English, with a Spanish section.[43] In September 2008, FNC joined other channels in introducing a live streaming segment to its website: The Strategy Room, designed to appeal to older viewers. It airs weekdays from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. and takes the form of an informal discussion, with running commentary on the news. Regular discussion programs include Business Hour, News With a View and God Talk.[44] In March 2009, The Fox Nation was launched as a website intended to encourage readers to post articles commenting on the news.[45] Fox News Mobile is the portion of the FNC website dedicated to streaming news clips formatted for video-enabled mobile phones.[46] Ratings and reception In 2003, Fox News saw a large ratings jump during the early stages of the US invasion of Iraq. At the height of the conflict, according to some reports, Fox News had as much as a 300% increase in viewership (averaging 3.3 million viewers daily).[47] In 2004, Fox News' ratings for its broadcast of the Republican National Convention exceeded those of the three major broadcast networks. During President George W. Bush's address, Fox News attracted 7.3 million viewers nationally; NBC, ABC, and CBS had a viewership of 5.9 million, 5.1 million, and 5.0 million respectively. Between late 2005 and early 2006, Fox News saw a brief decline in ratings. One was in the second quarter of 2006, when it lost viewers for every prime-time program compared with the previous quarter. The audience for the Special Report with Brit Hume, for example, dropped 19%. Several weeks later, in the wake of the 2006 North Korean missile test and the 2006 Lebanon War, Fox saw a surge in viewership and remained the No. 1 rated cable news channel.[48] Fox produced eight of the top ten most-watched nightly cable news shows, with The O'Reilly Factor and Hannity & Colmes finishing first and second respectively.[49] FNC ranked No. 8 in viewership among all cable channels in 2006, and No. 7 in 2007.[50] The channel ranked number one during the week of Barack Obama's election (November 3–9) in 2008, and reached the top spot again in January 2010 (during the week of the special Senate election in Massachusetts).[51] Comparing Fox to its 24-hour-news-channel competitors, in May 2010 the channel drew an average daily prime-time audience of 1.8 million viewers (versus 747,000 for MSNBC and 595,000 for CNN).[52] In September 2009, the Pew Research Center published a report on the public view of national news organizations. In the report, 72 percent of polled Republican Fox viewers rated the channel as "favorable", while 43 percent of polled Democratic viewers and 55 percent of all polled viewers shared that opinion. However, Fox was given the highest "unfavorable" rating of all national outlets studied (25 percent of all polled viewers). The report went on to say, "partisan differences in views of Fox News have increased substantially since 2007".[53] A Public Policy Polling poll concluded in 2013 that positive perceptions of FNC had declined from 2010. 41% of polled voters said they trust it, down from 49% in 2010, while 46% said they distrust it, up from 37% in 2010. It was also called the "most trusted" network by 34% of those polled, more than had said the same of any other network.[54]
In prime time and total day ratings for the week of April 15 to 21, 2013, Fox News, propelled by its coverage of the Boston Marathon bombing, was the highest-ranked network on U.S. cable television, for the first time since August 2005, when Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast of the United States.[57] January 2014 marked Fox News's 145th consecutive month as the number one rated cable news channel. During that month, Fox News beat CNN and MSNBC combined in overall viewers in both prime time hours and the total day.[58] In the third quarter of 2014, the network was the most-watched cable channel during prime time hours.[59] During the final week of the campaign for the United States elections, 2014, Fox News had the highest ratings of any cable channel, news or otherwise. On election night itself, Fox News' coverage had higher ratings than that of any of the other five cable or network news sources among viewers between 25 and 54 years of age.[60] The network hosted the first prime-time GOP candidates' forum of the 2016 campaign on August 6. The debate reached a record-breaking 24 million viewers, by far the largest audience ever for any cable news event.[61] In 2018, the Fox News was rated by Nielsen as America's most watched cable network, averaging a record 2.4 million viewers in prime time and total day during the period of January 1 to December 30, 2018.[62] The COVID-19 pandemic led to increased viewership for all cable news networks. For the first calendar quarter of 2020 (1 January- 31 March), Fox News had their highest-rated quarter in the network’s history, with Nielsen showing a prime time average total audience of 3.387 million viewers. Sean Hannity's program, The Sean Hannity Show, was the top-rated show in cable news for the quarter averaging 4.2 million viewers, a figure that not only beat out all of its cable news competition but also placed it ahead of network competition in the same time slot. Fox ended the quarter with the top five shows in prime time, with Fox’s Tucker Carlson Tonight finishing the quarter in second overall with an average audience of 4.2 million viewers, followed by The Five, The Ingraham Angle, and Special Report with Bret Baier. The Rachel Maddow Show was the highest non-Fox show on cable, coming in sixth place. Finishing the quarter in 22nd place was The Lead with Jake Tapper, CNN's highest rated show.[63] According to a Fox News article on the subject, FOX & Friends averaged 1.8 million viewers, topping CNN’s New Day and MSNBC’s Morning Joe combined. The same Fox News article noted that the Fox Business Network also had its highest-rated quarter in history and that Fox News itself finished March as the highest-rated network in cable for the 45th consecutive month, "...and the digital platforms excelled, too," the article claimed.[64] Demographics As indicated by a New York Times article, based on Nielsen statistics, Fox appears to have a mostly aged demographic.[65] In 2008, in the 25–54 age group, Fox News had an average of 557,000 viewers, but dropped to 379,000 in 2013 while increasing its overall audience from 1.89 million in 2010 to 2.02 million in 2013. The median age of a prime-time viewer was 68 as of 2015.[66] A study done by the Pew Research Center found that around 60% of Fox News viewers identify as conservative.[67] According to a 2013 Gallup poll, 94% of Fox viewers "Either identify as or lean Republican".[68] Slogan Fox News Channel originally used the slogan "Fair and Balanced", which was coined by network co-founder Roger Ailes while the network was being established. The New York Times described the slogan as being a "blunt signal that Fox News planned to counteract what Mr. Ailes and many others viewed as a liberal bias ingrained in television coverage by establishment news networks".[69][70] In August 2003, Fox News sued comedian Al Franken over his use of the slogan as a subtitle for his book, Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right, which is critical of Fox News Channel.[71] The lawsuit was dropped three days later, after Judge Denny Chin refused its request for an injunction. In his decision, Chin ruled the case was "wholly without merit, both factually and legally". He went on to suggest that Fox News' trademark on the phrase "fair and balanced" could be invalid.[72] In December 2003, FNC won a legal battle concerning the slogan, when AlterNet filed a cancellation petition with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to have FNC's trademark rescinded as inaccurate. AlterNet included Robert Greenwald's documentary film Outfoxed (2004) as supporting evidence in its case.[73] After losing early motions, AlterNet withdrew its petition; the USPTO dismissed the case.[74] In 2008, FNC used the slogan "We Report, You Decide", referring to "You Decide 2008" (FNC's original slogan for its coverage of election issues). In August 2016, Fox News Channel began to quietly phase out the "Fair and Balanced" slogan in favor of "Most Watched, Most Trusted"; when these changes were reported in June 2017 by Gabriel Sherman (a writer who had written a biography on Ailes), a network executive said the change "has nothing to do with programming or editorial decisions". It was speculated by media outlets that Fox News Channel was wishing to distance itself from Ailes' tenure at the network.[69][70][75] In March 2018, the network introduced a new ad campaign, Real News. Real Honest Opinion. The ad campaign is intended to promote the network's opinion-based programming and counter perceptions surrounding "fake news".[76][77] Fox News still keeps both the "Fair & Balanced" and "Most Watched. Most Trusted." slogans. Content This section may be too long to read and navigate comfortably. Please consider splitting content into sub-articles, condensing it, or adding subheadings. (February 2018) Unbalanced scales.svg This section may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. Please help to create a more balanced presentation. Discuss and resolve this issue before removing this message. (March 2018) Benghazi attack and aftermath Fox News provided extensive coverage of the 2012 Benghazi attack, which host Sean Hannity described in December 2012 as "the story that the mainstream media ignores" and "obviously, a cover-up. And we will get to the bottom of it."[78] Programming analysis by Media Matters found that during the twenty months following the Benghazi attacks, FNC ran 1,098 segments on the issue, including:[79] 478 segments involving Susan Rice's September 16, 2012 Sunday news show appearances, during which she was falsely accused of lying 382 segments on Special Report, the network's flagship news program 281 segments alleging a "cover-up" by the Obama administration 144 interviews of GOP members of Congress, but just five interviews of Democratic members of Congress and Obama administration officials 120 comparisons to Iran-Contra, Watergate, and the actions of the Nixon administration 100 segments falsely suggesting the administration issued a "stand-down order" to prevent a rescue operation in Benghazi Over nearly four years after the Benghazi attack, there were ten official investigations, including six by Republican-controlled House committees. None of the investigations found any evidence of scandal, cover-up or lying by Obama administration officials. On June 29, 2018, Fox News broadcast a segment by news anchor Bret Baier entitled "Whatever happened to the Benghazi investigation?" which repeated some of the accusations the network had previously made about Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton, but for which the women had been exonerated by the official investigations.[80] Uranium One From 2015 into 2018, Fox News broadcast extensive coverage of an alleged scandal surrounding the sale of Uranium One to Russian interests, which host Sean Hannity characterized as "one of the biggest scandals in American history".[81] The Fox News coverage extended throughout the programming day, with particular emphasis by Hannity.[82] The network promoted an ultimately unfounded narrative asserting that, as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton personally approved the Uranium One sale in exchange for $145 million in bribes paid to the Clinton Foundation. Donald Trump repeated these allegations as a candidate and as president.[83][84][85] No evidence of wrongdoing by Clinton had been found after four years of allegations, an FBI investigation, and the 2017 appointment of a Federal attorney to evaluate the investigation. In November 2017, Fox News host Shepard Smith concisely debunked the alleged scandal, infuriating viewers who suggested he should work for CNN or MSNBC.[84] Hannity later called Smith "clueless," while Smith stated, "I get it, that some of our opinion programming is there strictly to be entertaining. I get that. I don't work there. I wouldn't work there."[86][87] Pro-Republican and pro-Trump bias Fox News Channel has been widely described as providing biased reporting in favor of conservative political positions,[26][27][88][89][90][91][92] the Republican Party[28][93][94] and President Donald Trump.[29][95][96][97][98] Political scientist Jonathan Bernstein described Fox News as an expanded part of the Republican Party.[28][94] Political scientists Matt Grossmann and David A. Hopkins write that Fox News has helped "Republicans communicate with their base and spread their ideas, and they have been effective in mobilizing voters to participate in midterm elections (as in 2010 and 2014)."[28] Prior to 2000, Fox News lacked an ideological tilt, and even had more Democrats watch the channel than Republicans.[99] During the 2004 presidential election, Fox News was markedly more hostile in its coverage of Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry, and distinguished itself among cable news outlets for heavy coverage of the Swift Boat smear campaign against Kerry.[100][101][102] During Obama's first term in office, Fox News helped launch and amplify the Tea Party movement, a conservative movement within the Republican party that organized protests against Obama and his policies.[26][92][103][104][105][106][107] During the Republican primaries, Fox News was widely perceived as trying to prevent Trump from clinching the nomination.[88] However, under Trump's presidency, Fox News remade itself into his image, as hardly any criticism of Trump could be heard on Fox News' prime-time shows.[95][108] Even in Fox News' news reporting, the network dedicated far more coverage to Hillary Clinton-related stories, which critics say was intended to deflect attention from the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.[108] Trump provided great access to Fox News during his presidency, giving 19 interviews to the channel while only 6 in total to other news channels by November 2017; The New York Times described Trump's Fox News interviews as "softball interviews" and some of the interviewers' interview styles as "fawning";[109] similarly, The Economist has described the network's coverage of Trump's presidency as "reliably fawning".[110] From 2015 to 2017, the Fox News prime-time line-up changed from one that was skeptical and questioning of Trump to a "Trump safe space, with a dose of Bannonist populism once considered on the fringe".[111] The Fox News website has also gotten more extreme in its rhetoric since the election of Donald Trump; according to Columbia's Tow Center for Digital Journalism, the Fox News website has "gone a little Breitbart" over time.[112] At the start of 2018, Fox News mostly ignored prominent scandals in the Trump administration which received ample coverage in other national media outlets, such as White House Staff Secretary Rob Porter's resignation amid domestic abuse allegations, the downgrading of Jared Kushner's security clearance and the existence of a non-disclosure agreement between Trump and the porn star Stormy Daniels.[113] In March 2019, Jane Mayer reported in The New Yorker that Fox News.com reporter Diana Falzone had the story of the Stormy Daniels–Donald Trump scandal before the 2016 election, but that Fox News executive Ken LaCorte told her, "Good reporting, kiddo. But Rupert [Murdoch] wants Donald Trump to win. So just let it go," and the story was killed. LaCorte denied making the statement to Falzone, but conceded, "I was the person who made the call. I didn't run it upstairs to Roger Ailes or others...I didn't do it to protect Donald Trump," adding "[Falzone] had put up a story that just wasn't anywhere close to being something I was comfortable publishing." Nik Richie, who claimed to be one of the sources for the story, called LaCorte's account "complete bullshit", adding "Fox News was culpable. I voted for Trump, and I like Fox, but they did their own 'catch and kill' on the story to protect him."[33][114] A 2008 study found Fox News gave disproportionate attention to polls suggesting low approval for President Bill Clinton.[115] A 2009 study found Fox News was less likely to pick up stories that reflected well on Democrats, and more likely to pick up stories that reflected well on Republicans.[116] A 2010 study comparing Fox News Channel's Special Report With Brit Hume and NBC's Nightly News coverage of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan during 2005 concluded "Fox News was much more sympathetic to the administration than NBC", suggesting "if scholars continue to find evidence of a partisan or ideological bias at FNC ... they should consider Fox as alternative, rather than mainstream, media".[117] Research finds that Fox News increases Republican vote shares and makes Republican politicians more partisan.[90][118][119][120] A 2007 study, using the introduction of Fox News into local markets (1996–2000) as an instrumental variable, found that in the 2000 presidential election "Republicans gained 0.4 to 0.7 percentage points in the towns that broadcast Fox News", suggesting "Fox News convinced 3 to 28 percent of its viewers to vote Republican, depending on the audience measure".[90] These results were confirmed by a 2015 study.[120] A 2014 study, using the same instrumental variable, found congressional "representatives become less supportive of President Clinton in districts where Fox News begins broadcasting than similar representatives in similar districts where Fox News was not broadcast."[119] A 2017 study, using channel positions as an instrumental variable, found "Fox News increases Republican vote shares by 0.3 points among viewers induced into watching 2.5 additional minutes per week by variation in position."[118] Another 2014 paper found Fox News viewing increased Republican vote shares among voters who identified as Republican or independent.[121] Fox News publicly denies it is biased, with Murdoch and Ailes saying have included Murdoch's statement that Fox has "given room to both sides, whereas only one side had it before".[122] Fox News host Chris Wallace has said, "I think we are the counter-weight [to NBC News] ... they have a liberal agenda, and we tell the other side of the story."[123] In 2004, Robert Greenwald's documentary film Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism argued Fox News had a conservative bias and featured clips from Fox News and internal memos from editorial vice president John Moody directing Fox News staff on how to report certain subjects.[124][125] A leaked memo from Fox News vice president Bill Sammon to news staff at the height of the health care reform in the United States debate has been cited as an example of the pro-Republican Party bias of Fox News. His memo asked the staff to "use the term 'government-run health insurance,' or, when brevity is a concern, 'government option,' whenever possible". The memo was sent shortly after Republican pollster Frank Luntz advised Sean Hannity on his Fox show, "If you call it a public option, the American people are split. If you call it the government option, the public is overwhelmingly against it".[126] Surveys suggest Fox News is widely perceived to be ideological. A 2009 Pew survey found Fox News is viewed as the most ideological channel in America, with 47 percent of those surveyed said Fox News is "mostly conservative", 14 percent said "mostly liberal" and 24 percent said "neither". In comparison, MSNBC had 36 percent identify it as "mostly liberal", 11 percent as "mostly conservative" and 27 percent as "neither". CNN had 37 percent describe it as "mostly liberal", 11 percent as "mostly conservative" and 33 percent as "neither".[127] A 2004 Pew Research Center survey found FNC was cited (unprompted) by 69 percent of national journalists as a conservative news organization.[128] A Rasmussen poll found 31 percent of Americans felt Fox News had a conservative bias, and 15 percent that it had a liberal bias. It found 36 percent believed Fox News delivers news with neither a conservative or liberal bias, compared with 37 percent who said NPR delivers news with no conservative or liberal bias and 32 percent who said the same of CNN.[129] David Carr, media critic for The New York Times, praised the 2012 presidential election results coverage on Fox News for the network's response to Republican adviser and Fox News contributor Karl Rove challenging its call that Barack Obama would win Ohio and the election. Fox's prediction was correct. Carr wrote: Over many months, Fox lulled its conservative base with agitprop: that President Obama was a clear failure, that a majority of Americans saw [Mitt] Romney as a good alternative in hard times, and that polls showing otherwise were politically motivated and not to be believed. But on Tuesday night, the people in charge of Fox News were confronted with a stark choice after it became clear that Mr. Romney had fallen short: was Fox, first and foremost, a place for advocacy or a place for news? In this moment, at least, Fox chose news.[130] A May 2017 study conducted by Harvard University's Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy examined coverage of Trump's first 100 days in office by several major mainstream media outlets including Fox.[131] It found Trump received 80% negative coverage from the overall media, and received the least negative coverage on Fox – 52% negative and 48% positive.[132] On March 14, 2017, Andrew Napolitano, a Fox News commentator, claimed on Fox & Friends that British intelligence agency GCHQ had wiretapped Donald Trump on behalf of Barack Obama during the 2016 United States presidential election.[133][134] On March 16, 2017, White House spokesman Sean Spicer repeated the claim.[133] When Trump was questioned about the claim at a news conference, he said "All we did was quote a certain very talented legal mind who was the one responsible for saying that on television. I didn't make an opinion on it."[135] On March 17, 2017, Shepard Smith, a Fox News anchor, admitted the network had no evidence that Trump was under surveillance. British officials said the White House was backing off the claim.[135] Napolitano was later suspended by Fox News for making the claim.[136] In June 2018, Fox News executives instructed producers to head off inappropriate remarks made on the shows aired by the network by hosts and commentators.[137] The instructions came after a number of Fox News hosts and guests made incendiary comments about the Trump administration's policy of separating migrant children from their parents.[137] Fox News host Laura Ingraham had likened the child detention centers that the children were in to "summer camps". Guest Corey Lewandowski mocked the story of a 10-year-old child with Down syndrome being separated from her mother; the Fox News host did not address Lewandowski's statement.[137] Guest Ann Coulter falsely claimed that the separated children were "child actors"; the Fox News host did not challenge her claim.[137] In a segment on Trump's alleged use of racial dog whistles, one Fox News contributor told an African-American whom he was debating, "You're out of your cotton-picking mind."[137] According to the 2016 book Asymmetric Politics by political scientists Matt Grossmann and David A. Hopkins, "Fox News tends to raise the profile of scandals and controversies involving Democrats that receive scant attention in other media, such as the relationship between Barack Obama and William Ayers ... Hillary Clinton's role in the fatal 2012 attacks on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya; the gun-running scandal known as 'Fast and Furious'; the business practices of federal loan guarantee recipient Solyndra; the past activism of Obama White House operative Van Jones; the 2004 attacks on John Kerry by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth; the controversial sermons of Obama's Chicago pastor Jeremiah Wright; the filming of undercover videos of supposed wrongdoing by the liberal activist group ACORN; and even the 'war on Christmas' supposedly waged every December by secular, multicultural liberals."[104] In October 2018, Fox News ran laudatory coverage of a meeting between Trump-supporting rapper Kanye West and President Trump in the Oval Office. Fox News had previously run negative coverage of rappers and their involvement with Democratic politicians and causes, such as when Fox News ran headlines describing conscious hip-hop artist Common as "vile" and a "cop-killer rapper", and when Fox News ran negative coverage of Kanye West before he became a Trump supporter.[138] On November 4, 2018, Trump's website, DonaldJTrump.com, announced in a press release that Fox News host Sean Hannity would make a "special guest appearance" with Trump at a midterm campaign rally the following night in Cape Girardeau, Missouri.[139] The following morning, Hannity tweeted "To be clear, I will not be on stage campaigning with the President."[140] Hannity appeared at the president's lectern on stage at the rally, immediately mocking the "fake news" at the back of the auditorium, Fox News reporters among them. Several Fox News employees expressed outrage at Hannity's actions, with one stating, "a new line was crossed."[141] Hannity later asserted that his action was not pre-planned, and Fox News stated it "does not condone any talent participating in campaign events".[142] Fox News host Jeanine Pirro also appeared on stage with Trump at the rally. The Trump press release was later removed from Trump's website.[139][143] Fox News released a poll of registered voters, jointly conducted by two polling organizations, on June 16, 2019. The poll found some unfavorable results for Trump, notably that a record high 50% thought the Trump campaign had coordinated with the Russian government, and 50% thought he should be impeached — 43% saying he should also be removed from office — while 48% said they did not favor impeachment.[144][145] The next morning on Fox & Friends First, host Heather Childers twice misrepresented the poll results, stating "a new Fox News poll shows most voters don’t want impeachment" and "at least half of U.S. voters do not think President Trump should be impeached," while the on-screen display of the actual poll question was also incorrect. Later that morning on America's Newsroom, the on-screen display showed the correct poll question and results, but highlighted the 48% of respondents who opposed impeachment rather than the 50% who supported it (the latter being broken-out into two figures). As host Bill Hemmer drew guest Byron York's attention to the 48% opposed figure, they did not discuss the 50% support figure, while the on-screen chyron read, "Fox News Poll: 43% Support Trump's Impeachment and Removal, 48% Oppose."[146] Later that day, Trump tweeted "@FoxNews Polls are always bad for me...Something weird going on at Fox."[147] Coverage of Russia investigation On October 30, 2017, when special counsel Robert S. Mueller III indicted Paul Manafort and Rick Gates, and revealed George Papadopoulos had plead guilty (all of whom were involved in the Trump 2016 campaign), this was the focus of most media's coverage, except Fox News'.[148] Hosts and guests on Fox News called for Mueller to be fired.[148][149] Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson focused their shows on unsubstantiated allegations that Clinton sold uranium to Russia in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation and on the Clinton campaign's role in funding the Donald Trump–Russia dossier.[148][150] Hannity asserted, "The very thing they are accusing President Trump of doing, they did it themselves."[148] During the segment, Hannity mistakenly referred to Clinton as President Clinton.[148][151] Fox News dedicated extensive coverage to the uranium story, which Democrats said was an attempt to distract from Mueller's intensifying investigation.[152][153] CNN described the coverage as "a tour de force in deflection and dismissal".[150] On October 31, CNN reported Fox News employees were dissatisfied with their outlet's coverage of the Russia investigation, with employees calling it an "embarrassment", "laughable" and saying it "does the viewer a huge disservice and further divides the country" and that it is "another blow to journalists at Fox who come in every day wanting to cover the news in a fair and objective way".[154][155] When the investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election intensified in October 2017, the focus of Fox News coverage turned "what they see as the scandal and wrongdoing of President Trump's political opponents. In reports like these, Bill and Hillary Clinton are prominent and recurring characters because they are considered the real conspirators working with the Russians to undermine American democracy."[156] Paul Waldman of the Washington Post described the coverage as "No puppet. You're the puppet", saying it was a "careful, coordinated, and comprehensive strategy" to distract from Mueller's investigation.[157] German Lopes of Vox said Fox News' coverage has reached "levels of self-parody" as it dedicated coverage to low-key stories, such as a controversial Newsweek op-ed and hamburger emojis, while other networks had wall-to-wall coverage of Mueller's indictments.[158] A FiveThirtyEight analysis of Russia-related media coverage in cable news found most mentions of Russia on Fox News were spoken in close proximity to "uranium" and "dossier".[159] On November 1, 2017, Vox analyzed the transcripts of Fox News, CNN and MSNBC, and found Fox News "was unable to talk about the Mueller investigation without bringing up Hillary Clinton", "talked significantly less about George Papadopoulos — the Trump campaign adviser whose plea deal with Mueller provides the most explicit evidence thus far that the campaign knew of the Russian government's efforts to help Trump — than its competitors", and "repeatedly called Mueller's credibility into question".[160] In December 2017, Fox News escalated its attacks on the Mueller investigation, with hosts and guest commentators suggesting the investigation amounted to a coup.[161][162][163][164][165] Guest co-host Kevin Jackson referred to a right-wing conspiracy theory claiming Strzok's messages are evidence of a plot by FBI agents to assassinate Trump, a claim which the other Fox co-hosts quickly said is not supported by any credible evidence.[166][167] Fox News host Jeanine Pirro called the Mueller investigation team a "criminal cabal" and said the team ought to be arrested.[161] Other Fox News figures referred to the investigation as "corrupt", "crooked" and "illegitimate", and likened the FBI to the KGB, the Soviet-era spy organization that routinely tortured and summarily executed people.[162] Political scientists and scholars of coups described the Fox News rhetoric as scary and dangerous.[162] Experts on coups rejected that the Mueller investigation amounted to a coup; rather, the Fox News rhetoric was dangerous to democracy and mirrored the kind of rhetoric that occurs before purges.[162] A number of observers argued the Fox News rhetoric was intended to discredit the Mueller investigation and sway President Donald Trump to fire Mueller.[168] In August 2018, Fox News was criticized for giving more prominent coverage of a murder committed by an undocumented immigrant than the convictions of Donald Trump's former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and his long-term personal attorney, Michael Cohen.[169] At the same time, most other national mainstream media gave wall-to-wall coverage of the convictions.[170] Fox News hosts Dana Perrino and Jason Chaffetz argued that voters care far more about the murder than the convictions of the President's former top aides, and hosts Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity downplayed the convictions.[171][169][172] False claims about other media CNN's Jake Tapper In November 2017, in the immediate aftermath of the 2017 New York City truck attack wherein a terrorist shouted "Allahu Akbar", Fox News distorted a statement by Jake Tapper to make it appear as if he had said "Allahu Akbar" can be used under the most "beautiful circumstances".[173] Fox News omitted that Tapper had said the use of "Allahu Akbar" in the terrorist attack was not one of these beautiful circumstances.[173] A headline on FoxNews.com was preceded by a tag reading "OUTRAGEOUS".[173] The Fox News Twitter account distorted the statement even more, saying "Jake Tapper Says 'Allahu Akbar' Is 'Beautiful' Right After NYC Terror Attack" in a tweet that was later deleted.[173] Tapper chastised Fox News for choosing to "deliberately lie" and said "there was a time when one could tell the difference between Fox and the nutjobs at Infowars. It's getting tougher and tougher. Lies are lies."[173] Tapper had in 2009, while a White House correspondent for ABC News, come to the defense of Fox News when Obama criticized the network for not being a legitimate news organization.[174] Fox News guest host Jason Chaffetz apologized to Tapper for misrepresenting his statement.[175] After Fox News had deleted the tweet, Sean Hannity repeated the misrepresentation and called Tapper "liberal fake news CNN's fake Jake Tapper" and mocked his ratings.[174][175] The New York Times In July 2017, a report by Fox & Friends falsely said The New York Times had disclosed intelligence in one of its stories and that this intelligence disclosure helped Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State, to evade capture.[176] The report cited an inaccurate assertion by Gen. Tony Thomas, the head of the United States Special Operations Command, that a major newspaper had disclosed the intelligence.[176][177] Fox News said it was the New York Times, repeatedly running the chyron "NYT Foils U.S. Attempt To Take Out Al-Bahgdadi".[177] Pete Hegseth, one of the show's hosts, criticized the "failing New York Times".[177] President Donald Trump tweeted about the Fox & Friends report shortly after it first aired, saying "The Failing New York Times foiled U.S. attempt to kill the single most wanted terrorist, Al-Baghdadi. Their sick agenda over National Security."[176] Fox News later updated the story, but without apologizing to the New York Times or responding directly to the inaccuracies.[177] In a Washington Post column, Erik Wemple said Chris Wallace had covered The New York Times story himself on Fox News Sunday. "Here's another case of the differing standards between Fox News's opinion operation", which has given "a state-run vibe on all matters related to Trump", compared to Fox News's news operation, which has provided "mostly sane coverage".[178] Climate change Fox News has widely been described as a major platform for climate change denial.[179][180][181][182] According to the fact-checking website Climate Feedback, Fox News is part of "a network of unreliable outlets for climate news."[180] A 2011 study found Fox News "takes a more dismissive tone toward climate change than CNN and MSNBC".[183] A 2008 study found Fox News emphasized the scientific uncertainty of climate change more than CNN, was less likely to say climate change was real, and more likely to interview climate change skeptics.[183] Leaked emails showed that in 2009 Bill Sammon, the Fox News Washington managing editor, instructed Fox News journalists to dispute the scientific consensus on climate change: "refrain from asserting that the planet has warmed (or cooled) in any given period without IMMEDIATELY pointing out that such theories are based upon data that critics have called into question."[184] According to climate scientist Michael E. Mann, Fox News "has constructed an alternative universe where the laws of physics no longer apply, where the greenhouse effect is a myth, and where climate change is a hoax, the product of a massive conspiracy among scientists, who somehow have gotten the polar bears, glaciers, sea levels, superstorms, and megadroughts to play along."[181] According to James Lawrence Powell's 2011 study of the climate science denial movement, Fox News provides "the deniers with a platform to say whatever they like without fear of contradiction."[182] Fox News employs Steve Milloy, a prominent climate change denier with close financial and organizational ties to oil companies, as a contributor. In his columns about climate change for FoxNews.com, Fox News has failed to disclose his substantial funding from oil companies.[185] In 2011, the hosts of Fox & Friends described climate change as "unproven science", a "disputed fact", and criticized the Department of Education for working together with Nickelodeon to teach children about climate change.[186] In 2001, Sean Hannity described the scientific consensus on climate change as "phony science from the left".[187] In 2004, he falsely alleged, "scientists still can't agree on whether the global warming is scientific fact or fiction".[187] In 2010, Hannity said the so-called "Climategate" – the leaking of e-mails by climate scientist that climate change skeptics claimed demonstrated scientific misconduct but which all subsequent enquiries have found no evidence of misconduct or wrongdoing – a "scandal" that "exposed global warming as a myth cooked up by alarmists".[188] Hannity frequently invites contrarian fringe scientists and critics of climate change to his shows.[189] In 2019, a widely shared Fox News news report falsely claimed that new climate science research showed that the Earth might be heading to a new Ice Age; the author of the study that Fox News cited said that Fox News "utterly misrepresents our research" and the study did not in any way suggest that Earth was heading to an Ice Age. Fox News later corrected the story.[190] Shepard Smith has drawn attention for being one of few voices on Fox News to forcefully state that climate change is real, that human activities are a primary contributor to it and that there is a scientific consensus on the issue.[191][192] His acceptance of the scientific consensus on climate change has drawn criticism from Fox News viewers and conservatives.[193][194] Murder of Seth Rich conspiracy See also: Murder of Seth Rich On May 16, 2017, a day when other news organizations were extensively covering Donald Trump's revelation of classified information to Russia,[195] Fox News ran a lead story about a private investigator's uncorroborated claims about the murder of Seth Rich, a DNC staffer.[196][197][198] The private investigator said he had uncovered evidence that Rich was in contact with Wikileaks and law enforcement were covering it up.[196] The killing of Rich has given rise to conspiracy theories in rightwing circles that Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party had Seth Rich killed allegedly because he was the source of the DNC leaks.[196] U.S. intelligence agencies determined Russia was the source of the leaks.[199] In reporting the investigator's claims, the Fox News report reignited right-wing conspiracy theories about the killing.[196][198] The Fox News story fell apart within hours.[200] Other news organizations quickly revealed the investigator was a Donald Trump supporter and had according to NBC News "developed a reputation for making outlandish claims, such as one appearance on Fox News in 2007 in which he warned that underground networks of pink pistol-toting lesbian gangs were raping young women."[196][201] The family of Seth Rich, the Washington D.C. police department, the Washington D.C. mayor's office, the FBI, and law enforcement sources familiar with the case rebuked the investigator's claims.[196][197] The family said, "We are a family who is committed to facts, not fake evidence that surfaces every few months to fill the void and distract law enforcement and the general public from finding Seth's murderers."[196] The spokesperson for the family criticized Fox News for its reporting, alleging the outlet was motivated by a desire to deflect attention from the Trump-Russia story: "I think there's a very special place in hell for people that would use the memory of a murder victim in order to pursue a political agenda."[195] The family has called for retractions and apologies from Fox News for the inaccurate reporting.[201][202] Over the course of the day, Fox News altered the contents of the story and the headline, but did not issue corrections.[201][203] When CNN contacted the private investigator later that day, the investigator said he had no evidence that Rich had contacted Wikileaks.[198] The investigator claimed he only learned about the possible existence of the evidence from a Fox News reporter.[198] Fox News did not respond to inquiries by CNN, and the Washington Post.[197][198] Fox News later on 23 May, seven days after the story was published, retracted its original report, saying the original report did not meet its standards.[200][204] Nicole Hemmer, then assistant professor at the Miller Center of Public Affairs, wrote that the promotion of the conspiracy theory demonstrated how Fox News was "remaking itself in the image of fringe media in the age of Trump, blurring the lines between real and fake news."[205] Max Boot of the Council on Foreign Relations said while intent behind Fox News, as a counterweight to the liberal media was laudable, the culmination of those efforts have been to create an alternative news source that promotes hoaxes and myths, of which the promotion of the Seth Rich conspiracy is an example.[206] Fox News was also criticized by conservative outlets, such as the Weekly Standard,[207] National Review,[208][209] and conservative columnists, such as Jennifer Rubin,[210] Michael Gerson,[211] and John Podhoretz.[212] Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville Various Fox News hosts and contributors defended Trump's remarks that "many sides" were to blame for violence at a gathering of hundreds of white nationalists in Charlottesville, Virginia.[213][214] Some criticized Trump.[214][215] In a press conference on August 15, Trump used the term "alt-left" to describe counterprotesters at the white supremacist rally, a term which had been used in Fox News' coverage of the white supremacist rally.[213] Several of Trump's comments at the press conference mirrored those appearing earlier on Fox News.[216] According to Dylan Byers of CNN, Fox News' coverage on the day of the press conference "was heavy with "whataboutism". The average Fox viewer was likely left with the impression that the media's criticism of Trump and leftist protestors' toppling of some Confederate statues were far greater threats to America than white supremacism or the president's apparent defense of bigotry."[215] Byers wrote, "it showed that if Fox News has a line when it comes to Trump's presidency, it was not crossed on Tuesday."[215] Glenn Beck's comments about George Soros During Glenn Beck's tenure at Fox News, he became one of the most high-profile proponents of conspiracy theories about George Soros, a Jewish Hungarian-American businessman and philanthropist known for his donations to American liberal political causes.[217] Beck regularly described Soros as a "puppet-master" and used common anti-Semitic tropes to refer to Soros and his activities.[217] In a 2010 three-part series, Beck depicted George Soros as a cartoonish villain trying to "form a shadow government, using humanitarian aid as a cover," and that Soros wanted a one-world government.[218][219] Beck promoted the false and anti-Semitic conspiracy theory that Soros was a Nazi collaborator as a 14-year old in Nazi-occupied Hungary.[220] Beck also characterized Soros's mother as a "wildly anti-Semitic" Nazi collaborator.[218] According to The Washington Post, "Beck's series was largely considered obscene and delusional, if not outright anti-Semitic", but Beck's conspiracy theory became popular on the rightwing of American politics.[218] Amid criticism of Beck's false smears, Fox News defended Beck, stating "information regarding Mr. Soros's experiences growing up were taken directly from his writings and from interviews given by him to the media, and no negative opinion was offered as to his actions as a child."[219][221] Roger Ailes, then-head of Fox News, dismissed criticism levied at Beck by hundreds of rabbis, saying that they were "left-wing rabbis who basically don't think that anybody can ever use the word, Holocaust, on the air."[222] 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic Main article: Fox News controversies § Coverage of the coronavirus pandemic During the first few weeks of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic spread into the United States, Fox News was far more likely than other mainstream news outlets to promote misinformation about coronavirus.[223] The network promoted the narrative that the emergency response to the pandemic was politically motivated or otherwise unwarranted,[224] with one commentator even calling it a "hoax".[225] This coverage was consistent with the messaging of Trump at the time.[226] Only in mid March did the network change the tone of its coverage,[227] after President Trump declared a national emergency.[226] Two of Fox News's commentators - Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham - promoted use of the drug hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of Coronavirus - off-label usage which at the time was supported only by anecdotal evidence - after it was touted by Trump as a possible cure.[228] As a result of this continued skewed reporting, Washington Post media critic Erik Wemple has called Hannity to be fired.[229] Fox News promoted a conspiracy theory that coronavirus death toll numbers were inflated with people who would have died anyway from preexisting conditions. This was refuted by White House coronavirus task force members Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx, with Fauci describing conspiracy theories as "nothing but distractions" during public health crises.[230] In a USA Today article, "Coronavirus: How Fox News and other right-wing media endanger our health", the author cited as an example, a Fox News interview with Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton who raised the "escaped virus conspiracy theory" by saying the corona virus may have started in a "...biosafety level 4 super laboratory" in Wuhan, China. The article said that Cotton had mentioned the "debunked theory ... at least two other times on Fox."[231][232] Several weeks later Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin detailed a 2018 trip made to the Wuhan Institute of Virology by scientists from the U.S. Embassy. Rogin cited cables sent back to Washington, warning "...about safety and management weaknesses at the WIV lab and that the lab’s work on bat coronaviruses and their potential human transmission represented a risk of a new SARS-like pandemic."[233] Rogin's article quoted Xiao Qiang, a research scientist at the University of California, Berkeley , "I don’t think it’s a conspiracy theory. I think it’s a legitimate question that needs to be investigated and answered."[233] Days later, multiple media outlets confirmed that U.S. intelligence officials were investigating the possibility that the virus started in the same lab Cotton cited during the Fox News interview.[234][235][236][237] At the same time that Fox News commentators downplayed the threat of the virus in public, Fox's management and the Murdoch family took a broad range of internal measures to protect themselves and their employees against it.[238][239][240][241][242] Controversies This section may be too long to read and navigate comfortably. Please consider splitting content into sub-articles, condensing it, or adding subheadings. (February 2018) Unbalanced scales.svg This section may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. Please help to create a more balanced presentation. Discuss and resolve this issue before removing this message. (March 2018) Main article: Fox News controversies Sexual harassment The network has been accused of permitting sexual harassment and racial discrimination by on-air hosts, executives, and employees, paying out millions of dollars in legal settlements.[243] Prominent Fox News figures such as Roger Ailes, Bill O'Reilly and Eric Bolling were eventually fired after a multitude of women accused them of sexual harassment. At least four lawsuits alleged Fox News co-president Bill Shine ignored, enabled or concealed Roger Ailes' alleged sexual harassment.[244][245][246] Fox News CEO Rupert Murdoch has dismissed the high-profile sexual misconduct allegations as "largely political" and speculated they were made "because we are conservative".[247] Bill O'Reilly and Fox News settled six agreements, totaling $45 million, with women who accused O'Reilly of sexual harassment.[248][249] In January 2017, shortly after Bill O'Reilly settled a sexual harassment lawsuit for $32 million ("an extraordinarily large amount for such cases"), Fox News renewed Bill O'Reilly's contract.[248] Fox News's parent company, 21st Century Fox, said it was aware of the lawsuit.[248] The contract between O'Reilly and Fox News read he could not be fired from the network unless sexual harassment allegations were proved in court.[250] Fox News's extensive coverage of the Harvey Weinstein scandal in October 2017 was seen by some as hypocritical.[251][252] Fox News dedicated at least 12 hours of coverage to the Weinstein scandal, yet only dedicated 20 minutes to Bill O'Reilly, who just like Weinstein had been accused of sexual harassment by a multitude of women.[251][252] Indira Lakshmana, an expert in journalism ethics at the Poynter Institute, said "to devote hours of airtime to crowing about Weinstein's well-deserved downfall because of his liberal politics, while ignoring the massive, decades-long pattern of harassment by powerful men at Fox, is both hypocritical and sad".[252] A few weeks later, when a number of women under the age of 18, including a 14-year old, accused Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore of making sexual advances, Hannity dismissed the sexual misconduct allegations and dedicated coverage on his TV show to casting doubt on the accusers.[253][254] Other prime-time Fox News hosts Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham questioned the Washington Post's reporting or opted to bring up sexual misconduct allegations regarding show business figures such as Harvey Weinstein and Louis C.K.[111] Fox News figures Jeanine Pirro and Gregg Jarrett questioned both the validity of the Washington Post's reporting and that of the women.[255] In December 2017, a few days before the Alabama Senate election, Fox News, along with the conspiracy websites Breitbart and Gateway Pundit, ran an inaccurate headline which claimed one of Roy Moore's accusers admitted to forging an inscription by Roy Moore in her yearbook; Fox News later added a correction to the story.[256] A number of Fox News hosts have welcomed Bill O'Reilly to their shows and paid tributes to Roger Ailes after his death. In May 2017, Hannity called Ailes "a second father" and said to Ailes's "enemies" that he was "preparing to kick your a** in the next life".[257] Ailes had the year before been fired from Fox News after a number of women alleged he sexually harassed them.[257] In September 2017, several months after Bill O'Reilly was fired from Fox News in the wake of a number of women alleging he sexually harassed them, Hannity hosted O'Reilly on his show.[258][259][260] Some Fox News employees criticized the decision.[259] According to CNN, during the interview, Hannity found kinship with O'Reilly as he appeared "to feel that he and O'Reilly have both become victims of liberals looking to silence them."[259] Earlier, Hannity had dedicated extensive coverage to the Weinstein scandal.[261] Obama administration conflict In September 2009, the Obama administration engaged in a verbal conflict with Fox News Channel. On September 20, President Barack Obama appeared on all major news programs except Fox News, a snub partially in response to remarks about him by commentators Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity and Fox coverage of Obama's health-care proposal.[262][263] In late September 2009, Obama senior advisor David Axelrod and Roger Ailes met in secret to attempt to smooth out tensions between the two camps. Two weeks later, chief of staff Rahm Emanuel referred to FNC as "not a news network" and communications director Anita Dunn said "Fox News often operates as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party".[264][265] Obama observed, "If media is operating basically as a talk radio format, then that's one thing, and if it's operating as a news outlet, then that's another".[266] White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel said it was important "to not have the CNNs and the others in the world basically be led in following Fox".[267] Within days, it was reported that Fox had been excluded from an interview with administration official Ken Feinberg, with bureau chiefs from the White House press pool (ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN) coming to Fox's defense.[265] A bureau chief said, "If any member had been excluded it would have been the same thing, it has nothing to do with Fox or the White House or the substance of the issues".[268] Shortly after the story broke, the White House admitted to a low-level mistake, saying Fox had not made a specific request to interview Feinberg. Fox White House correspondent Major Garrett said he had not made a specific request, but had a "standing request from me as senior White House correspondent on Fox to interview any newsmaker at the Treasury at any given time news is being made".[269] On November 8, 2009, the Los Angeles Times reported an unnamed Democratic consultant was warned by the White House not to appear on Fox News again. According to the article, Anita Dunn claimed in an e-mail to have checked with colleagues who "deal with TV issues" who denied telling anyone to avoid Fox. Patrick Caddell, a Fox News contributor and former pollster for President Jimmy Carter, said he had spoken with other Democratic consultants who had received similar warnings from the White House.[270] On October 2, 2013, Fox News host Anna Kooiman cited on the air a fake story from the National Report parody site, which claimed Obama had offered to keep the International Museum of Muslim Cultures open with cash from his own pocket.[271][272][273] Journalistic ethical standards Fox News attracted controversy in April 2018 when it was revealed primetime host Sean Hannity had defended Michael Cohen on air without disclosing that Cohen was Hannity's lawyer.[274] On April 9, 2018, federal agents from the U.S. Attorney's office served a search warrant on the office and residence of Michael Cohen, Trump's personal attorney.[275] On the air, Hannity defended Cohen and criticized the federal action, calling it "highly questionable" and "an unprecedented abuse of power".[276] On April 16, 2018 in a court hearing, Cohen's lawyers told the judge that Cohen had ten clients in 2017–2018 but did "traditional legal tasks" for only three: Trump, Elliott Broidy, and a "prominent person" who did not wish to be named for fear of being "embarrassed".[277][278][279] The federal judge ordered the revelation of the third client, whom Cohen's lawyers named as Hannity.[277] Hannity was not sanctioned by Fox News for this breach of journalistic ethics, with Fox News releasing a statement that the channel was unaware of Hannity's relationship to Cohen and that it had "spoken to Sean and he continues to have our full support."[274][280][281][282] Media ethics experts said that Hannity's failure to disclose was a major breach of journalistic ethics and that the network should have suspended or fired him for it.[282] International transmission World map, with countries carrying terrestrial FNC in red and satellite providers in orange Countries where Fox News is provided The Fox News Channel feed is available internationally via a number of providers, while Fox Extra segments provide alternate programming.[283] Fox News is carried in more than 40 other countries. Australia In Australia, FNC is broadcast on the dominant pay television provider Foxtel, which is 65%% owned by News Corp Australia, the Australian arm of News Corp and the sister company of 21st Century Fox which owns FNC. Local cable news channel Sky News Australia is wholly owned by News Corp Australia[284] and is therefore FNC's de facto sister channel, although has formal partnerships with FNC competitor CNN as well as both ABC News and CBS News.[285] Brazil Since 2002, FNC has been broadcast to Brazil; however, commercials are replaced with Fox Extra. It is available in packages of Vivo TV. Canada Fox had initially planned to launch a joint venture with Canwest's Global Television Network, tentatively named Fox News Canada, which would have featured a mixture of U.S. and Canadian news programming. As a result, the CRTC denied a 2003 application requesting permission for Fox News Channel to be carried in Canada. However, in March 2004, a Fox executive said the venture had been shelved; in November of that year, the CRTC added Fox News to its whitelist of foreign channels that may be carried by television providers.[286] Mexico The channel's international feed is being carried by cable provider Izzi Telecom. France Fox News is available on cable through French Internet provider Free on channel 352. As of Spring 2017, the channel was no longer found on the provider Orange's lineup.[citation needed] India It is avaliable through Disney plus hotstar. Indonesia In Indonesia, It is available in Channel 335 in pay TV provider Indovision. Ireland See: Fox News#United Kingdom & Ireland. Israel In Israel, FNC is broadcast on Channel 105 of the satellite provider Yes, as well as being carried on Cellcom TV and Partner TV.[287] It is also broadcast on channel 200 on cable operator HOT.[288] Italy In Italy, FNC is broadcast on SKY Italia. Fox news was launched on Stream TV in 2001, and moved to SKY Italia in 2003. Japan Although service to Japan ceased in summer 2003, it can still be seen on Americable (distributor for American bases),[289] Mediatti (Kadena Air Base)[290] and Pan Global TV Japan.[291] Netherlands In the Netherlands, Fox News has been carried by cable providers UPC Nederland and CASEMA, and satellite provider Canaldigitaal; all have dropped the channel in recent years. At this time, only cable provider Caiway (available in a limited number of towns in the central part of the country) is broadcasting the channel. The channel was also carried by IPTV provider KNIPPR (owned by T-Mobile). New Zealand In New Zealand, FNC is broadcast on Channel 088 of pay satellite operator SKY Network Television's digital platform. It was formerly broadcast overnight on free-to-air UHF New Zealand TV channel Prime (owned by SKY); this was discontinued in January 2010, reportedly due to an expiring broadcasting license.[292] Fox News' former parent company News Corporation has a stake in both SKY and Prime. Pakistan In Pakistan, Fox News Channel is available on PTCL Smart TV and a number of cable and IPTV operators. Philippines In the Philippines, Fox News Channel was available on Cignal Digital TV channel 131 and G Sat Channel 50. Scandinavia Between 2003 and 2006, in Sweden and the other Scandinavian countries, FNC was broadcast 16 hours a day on TV8 (with Fox News Extra segments replacing U.S. advertising). Fox News was dropped by TV8 and replaced by German news channel Deutsche Welle in September 2006. Singapore In Singapore, FNC is broadcast on channel 702 on pay cable operator StarHub TV digital platform. It also broadcasts its sister channel, Sky News. South Africa In South Africa, FNC is broadcast on StarSat.[293] The most popular pay television operator, DStv, does not offer FNC in its channel bouquet.[294] United Kingdom & Ireland FNC was also carried in the United Kingdom by Sky, which was 40-percent owned by 21st Century Fox at the time, and operates its own domestic news channel Sky News. On August 29, 2017, Sky dropped Fox News; the broadcaster said its carriage was not "commercially viable" due to average viewership of fewer than 2,000 viewers per day. The company said the decision was unrelated to 21st Century Fox's proposed acquisition of the remainder of Sky plc (which ultimately led to a bidding war that resulted in its acquisition by Comcast instead).[295] The potential co-ownership had prompted concerns from critics of the deal, who felt Sky News could similarly undergo a shift to an opinionated format with a right-wing viewpoint. However, such a move would violate Ofcom broadcast codes, which requires all news programming to show due impartiality. The channel's broadcasts in the country have violated this rule on several occasions, while the channel also violated election silence rules by broadcasting analysis of the 2016 Brexit referendum while polls were still open (the channel was blacked out while polls were open during the 2017 general election to comply with the rule).[296][297][298][299]
Fox News From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Fox news) Jump to navigationJump to search For other uses, see Fox News (disambiguation). Fox News Channel Fox News Channel logo.svg Launched October 7, 1996; 23 years ago Owned by Fox Corporation Picture format 720p HDTV (downscaled to letterboxed 480i for the SDTV feed) Country United States Language English Broadcast area United States Headquarters 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York City, NY, U.S. 10036 Sister channel(s) Fox Business Network Fox Broadcasting Company Website www.foxnews.com Availability Satellite DirecTV Channel 360 (SD/HD) Dish Network Channel 205 (SD/HD) Bell TV (Canada) Channel 507 Shaw Direct (Canada) Channel 154 Channel 503 Foxtel (Australia) Channel 604 SKY TV (New Zealand) Channel 088 Sky Italia Channel 514 Digital+ Channel 77 MEO (Portugal) Channel 208 Cignal (Philippines) Channel 131 OSN Channel 411 beIN Channel 147 (HD) Oi TV (Brazil) Channel 184 Movistar TV (Chile) Channel 734 G Sat (Philippines) Channel 50 Cable Available on most US providers Channel slots vary on each operator Cablevisión (Argentina) Channel 552 (Digital) Macau Cable TV (Macau) Channel 816 Cable TV Hong Kong (Hong Kong) Channel 123 Movistar TV (Peru) Channel 548 SkyCable (Philippines) Channel 138 Nationwide: Channel 510 Izzi Telecom (Mexico) Channel 180 Satellite radio Sirius Channel 114 XM Channel 115 IPTV Verizon FiOS Channel 118 (SD) Channel 618 (HD) Bell Fibe TV (Canada) Channel 507 VMedia (Canada) Channel 181 Optik TV Channel 811 (HD; East) Channel 9811 (SD; West) now TV (Hong Kong) Channel 318 Singtel TV (Singapore) Channel 165 StarHub TV (Singapore) Channel 702 Streaming media foxnewsgo.com Live simulcast (Pay-TV subscribers only) fuboTV Live Stream This article is part of a series on Conservatism in the United States Collage of nine American conservatives: Ronald Reagan, Calvin Coolidge, Barry Goldwater, William F. Buckley Jr., Jack Kemp, Milton Friedman, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito About this image Schools[show] Principles[show] History[show] People[show] Parties[show] Think tanks[show] Other organizations[show] Media[show] Variants and movements[show] See also[show] DodgerBlue flag waving.svg Conservatism portal vte Fox News (officially Fox News Channel, abbreviated FNC and commonly known as Fox) is an American conservative[1][2] cable television news channel. It is owned by Fox News Media, which itself is owned by the Fox Corporation. The channel broadcasts primarily from studios at 1211 Avenue of the Americas in New York City. Fox News provides service to 86 countries and overseas territories worldwide,[3] with international broadcasts featuring Fox Extra segments during ad breaks. The channel was created by Australian-American media mogul Rupert Murdoch to appeal to a conservative audience, hiring former Republican media consultant and CNBC executive Roger Ailes as its founding CEO.[4][5] It launched on October 7, 1996, to 17 million cable subscribers.[6] Fox News grew during the late 1990s and 2000s to become the dominant subscription news network in the U.S.[7] As of September 2018, approximately 87,118,000 US households (90.8% of television subscribers) received Fox News.[8] In 2019, Fox News was the top-rated cable network, averaging 2.5 million viewers.[9][10][11] Murdoch is the current executive chairman and Suzanne Scott is the CEO.[12][13]
3 Outlets 3.1 Television 3.2 Radio 3.3 Online 4 Ratings and reception 4.1 Demographics 5 Slogan
Subsequently, and prior to founding FNC, Murdoch had gained experience in the 24-hour news business when News Corporation's BSkyB subsidiary began Europe's first 24-hour news channel (Sky News) in the United Kingdom in 1989.[17] With the success of his fourth network efforts in the United States,[18] experience gained from Sky News and the turnaround of 20th Century Fox, Murdoch announced on January 31, 1996, that News Corp. would launch a 24-hour news channel on cable and satellite systems in the United States as part of a News Corp. "worldwide platform" for Fox programming: "The appetite for news – particularly news that explains to people how it affects them – is expanding enormously".[19] In February 1996, after former U.S. Republican Party political strategist and NBC executive[20] Roger Ailes left cable television channel America's Talking (now MSNBC), Murdoch asked him to start Fox News Channel. Ailes demanded five months of 14-hour workdays and several weeks of rehearsal shows before its launch on October 7, 1996.[21] At its debut 17 million households were able to watch FNC;[6] however, it was absent from the media markets of New York City and Los Angeles. Rolling news coverage during the day consisted of 20-minute single-topic shows such as Fox on Crime or Fox on Politics, surrounded by news headlines. Interviews featured facts at the bottom of the screen about the topic or the guest. The flagship newscast at the time was The Schneider Report, with Mike Schneider's fast-paced delivery of the news. During the evening, Fox featured opinion shows: The O'Reilly Report (later The O'Reilly Factor), The Crier Report (hosted by Catherine Crier) and Hannity & Colmes. From the beginning, FNC has placed heavy emphasis on visual presentation. Graphics were designed to be colorful and gain attention; this helped the viewer to grasp the main points of what was being said, even if they could not hear the host (with on-screen text summarizing the position of the interviewer or speaker, and "bullet points" when a host was delivering commentary). Fox News also created the "Fox News Alert", which interrupted its regular programming when a breaking news story occurred.
During the September 11, 2001 attacks, Fox News was the first news organization to run a news ticker on the bottom of the screen to keep up with the flow of information that day. The ticker has remained, informing viewers about additional news which reporters may not mention on-screen and repeating news mentioned during a broadcast; it has proven popular with viewers.[25]
Outlets Fox News airport newsstand FNC airport newsstand at Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport Television news studio FNC's newsroom, November 15, 2007. FNC maintains an archive of most of its programs. This archive also includes Movietone News series of newsreels from its now Disney-owned namesake movie studio, 20th Century Fox. Licensing for the Fox News archive is handled by ITN Source, the archiving division of ITN.[38] Television Main article: List of programs broadcast by Fox News Channel FNC presents a variety of programming, with up to 15 hours of live broadcasting per day in addition to programming and content for the Fox Broadcasting Company. Most programs are broadcast from Fox News headquarters in New York City (at 1211 Avenue of the Americas), in its streetside studio on Sixth Avenue in the west wing of Rockefeller Center, sharing its headquarters with sister channel Fox Business Network. Fox News Channel has eight studios at its New York City headquarters that are used for its and Fox Business' programming: Studio B (used for Fox Business programming), Studio D (which has an area for studio audiences; and is used by The Greg Gutfeld Show, Fox and Friends First), Studio F (used for The Story with Martha MacCallum, The Five, and America's Election Headquarters, Fox and Friends, Outnumbered, Outnumbered Overtime, America's News HQ, Justice with Judge Jeanine) Studio G (which houses Fox Business shows), Studio H (Fox News Deck used for Shepard Smith Reporting and breaking news coverage), Studio J (used for America's Newsroom, Hannity and Justice with Judge Jeanine) Starting in 2018, Thursday Night Football had its pregame show, Fox NFL Thursday, originating from the Fox News studio. The remaining programs (such as Tucker Carlson Tonight, Special Report with Bret Baier, The Ingraham Angle, Fox News @ Night, and editions of America's News HQ not broadcast from the New York City studios) are broadcast from Fox News's Washington, D.C. studios, located on Capitol Hill across from Union Station in a secured building shared by a number of other television networks (including NBC News and C-SPAN). Audio simulcasts of the channel are aired on XM Satellite Radio and Sirius Satellite Radio. In an October 11, 2009, in a New York Times article, Fox said its hard-news programming runs from "9 a.m. to 4 p.m. and 6 to 8 p.m. on weekdays". However, it makes no such claims for its other broadcasts, which primarily consist of editorial journalism and commentary.[39] Fox News Channel began broadcasting in the 720p resolution format on May 1, 2008.[40] This format is available on all major cable and satellite providers. The Fox News Group produces Fox News Sunday, which airs on Fox Broadcasting and re-airs on FNC. Fox News also produces occasional special event coverage that is broadcast on FBC. Radio Main article: Fox News Radio With the growth of the FNC, the company introduced a radio division, Fox News Radio, in 2003.[41] Syndicated throughout the United States, the division provides short newscasts and talk radio programs featuring personalities from the television and radio divisions. In 2006, the company also introduced Fox News Talk, a satellite radio station featuring programs syndicated by (and featuring) Fox News personalities. Online Introduced in December 1995,[42] the Fox News website features the latest coverage, including columns by FNC television, radio and online personalities. Video clips are also available on Foxnews.com and Foxbusiness.com. Fox News Latino is the version aimed at the Hispanic audience, although presented almost entirely in English, with a Spanish section.[43] In September 2008, FNC joined other channels in introducing a live streaming segment to its website: The Strategy Room, designed to appeal to older viewers. It airs weekdays from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. and takes the form of an informal discussion, with running commentary on the news. Regular discussion programs include Business Hour, News With a View and God Talk.[44] In March 2009, The Fox Nation was launched as a website intended to encourage readers to post articles commenting on the news.[45] Fox News Mobile is the portion of the FNC website dedicated to streaming news clips formatted for video-enabled mobile phones.[46] Ratings and reception In 2003, Fox News saw a large ratings jump during the early stages of the US invasion of Iraq. At the height of the conflict, according to some reports, Fox News had as much as a 300% increase in viewership (averaging 3.3 million viewers daily).[47] In 2004, Fox News' ratings for its broadcast of the Republican National Convention exceeded those of the three major broadcast networks. During President George W. Bush's address, Fox News attracted 7.3 million viewers nationally; NBC, ABC, and CBS had a viewership of 5.9 million, 5.1 million, and 5.0 million respectively. Between late 2005 and early 2006, Fox News saw a brief decline in ratings. One was in the second quarter of 2006, when it lost viewers for every prime-time program compared with the previous quarter. The audience for the Special Report with Brit Hume, for example, dropped 19%. Several weeks later, in the wake of the 2006 North Korean missile test and the 2006 Lebanon War, Fox saw a surge in viewership and remained the No. 1 rated cable news channel.[48] Fox produced eight of the top ten most-watched nightly cable news shows, with The O'Reilly Factor and Hannity & Colmes finishing first and second respectively.[49] FNC ranked No. 8 in viewership among all cable channels in 2006, and No. 7 in 2007.[50] The channel ranked number one during the week of Barack Obama's election (November 3–9) in 2008, and reached the top spot again in January 2010 (during the week of the special Senate election in Massachusetts).[51] Comparing Fox to its 24-hour-news-channel competitors, in May 2010 the channel drew an average daily prime-time audience of 1.8 million viewers (versus 747,000 for MSNBC and 595,000 for CNN).[52] In September 2009, the Pew Research Center published a report on the public view of national news organizations. In the report, 72 percent of polled Republican Fox viewers rated the channel as "favorable", while 43 percent of polled Democratic viewers and 55 percent of all polled viewers shared that opinion. However, Fox was given the highest "unfavorable" rating of all national outlets studied (25 percent of all polled viewers). The report went on to say, "partisan differences in views of Fox News have increased substantially since 2007".[53] A Public Policy Polling poll concluded in 2013 that positive perceptions of FNC had declined from 2010. 41% of polled voters said they trust it, down from 49% in 2010, while 46% said they distrust it, up from 37% in 2010. It was also called the "most trusted" network by 34% of those polled, more than had said the same of any other network.[54]
In prime time and total day ratings for the week of April 15 to 21, 2013, Fox News, propelled by its coverage of the Boston Marathon bombing, was the highest-ranked network on U.S. cable television, for the first time since August 2005, when Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast of the United States.[57] January 2014 marked Fox News's 145th consecutive month as the number one rated cable news channel. During that month, Fox News beat CNN and MSNBC combined in overall viewers in both prime time hours and the total day.[58] In the third quarter of 2014, the network was the most-watched cable channel during prime time hours.[59] During the final week of the campaign for the United States elections, 2014, Fox News had the highest ratings of any cable channel, news or otherwise. On election night itself, Fox News' coverage had higher ratings than that of any of the other five cable or network news sources among viewers between 25 and 54 years of age.[60] The network hosted the first prime-time GOP candidates' forum of the 2016 campaign on August 6. The debate reached a record-breaking 24 million viewers, by far the largest audience ever for any cable news event.[61] In 2018, the Fox News was rated by Nielsen as America's most watched cable network, averaging a record 2.4 million viewers in prime time and total day during the period of January 1 to December 30, 2018.[62] The COVID-19 pandemic led to increased viewership for all cable news networks. For the first calendar quarter of 2020 (1 January- 31 March), Fox News had their highest-rated quarter in the network’s history, with Nielsen showing a prime time average total audience of 3.387 million viewers. Sean Hannity's program, The Sean Hannity Show, was the top-rated show in cable news for the quarter averaging 4.2 million viewers, a figure that not only beat out all of its cable news competition but also placed it ahead of network competition in the same time slot. Fox ended the quarter with the top five shows in prime time, with Fox’s Tucker Carlson Tonight finishing the quarter in second overall with an average audience of 4.2 million viewers, followed by The Five, The Ingraham Angle, and Special Report with Bret Baier. The Rachel Maddow Show was the highest non-Fox show on cable, coming in sixth place. Finishing the quarter in 22nd place was The Lead with Jake Tapper, CNN's highest rated show.[63] According to a Fox News article on the subject, FOX & Friends averaged 1.8 million viewers, topping CNN’s New Day and MSNBC’s Morning Joe combined. The same Fox News article noted that the Fox Business Network also had its highest-rated quarter in history and that Fox News itself finished March as the highest-rated network in cable for the 45th consecutive month, "...and the digital platforms excelled, too," the article claimed.[64] Demographics As indicated by a New York Times article, based on Nielsen statistics, Fox appears to have a mostly aged demographic.[65] In 2008, in the 25–54 age group, Fox News had an average of 557,000 viewers, but dropped to 379,000 in 2013 while increasing its overall audience from 1.89 million in 2010 to 2.02 million in 2013. The median age of a prime-time viewer was 68 as of 2015.[66] A study done by the Pew Research Center found that around 60% of Fox News viewers identify as conservative.[67] According to a 2013 Gallup poll, 94% of Fox viewers "Either identify as or lean Republican".[68] Slogan Fox News Channel originally used the slogan "Fair and Balanced", which was coined by network co-founder Roger Ailes while the network was being established. The New York Times described the slogan as being a "blunt signal that Fox News planned to counteract what Mr. Ailes and many others viewed as a liberal bias ingrained in television coverage by establishment news networks".[69][70] In August 2003, Fox News sued comedian Al Franken over his use of the slogan as a subtitle for his book, Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right, which is critical of Fox News Channel.[71] The lawsuit was dropped three days later, after Judge Denny Chin refused its request for an injunction. In his decision, Chin ruled the case was "wholly without merit, both factually and legally". He went on to suggest that Fox News' trademark on the phrase "fair and balanced" could be invalid.[72] In December 2003, FNC won a legal battle concerning the slogan, when AlterNet filed a cancellation petition with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to have FNC's trademark rescinded as inaccurate. AlterNet included Robert Greenwald's documentary film Outfoxed (2004) as supporting evidence in its case.[73] After losing early motions, AlterNet withdrew its petition; the USPTO dismissed the case.[74] In 2008, FNC used the slogan "We Report, You Decide", referring to "You Decide 2008" (FNC's original slogan for its coverage of election issues). In August 2016, Fox News Channel began to quietly phase out the "Fair and Balanced" slogan in favor of "Most Watched, Most Trusted"; when these changes were reported in June 2017 by Gabriel Sherman (a writer who had written a biography on Ailes), a network executive said the change "has nothing to do with programming or editorial decisions". It was speculated by media outlets that Fox News Channel was wishing to distance itself from Ailes' tenure at the network.[69][70][75] In March 2018, the network introduced a new ad campaign, Real News. Real Honest Opinion. The ad campaign is intended to promote the network's opinion-based programming and counter perceptions surrounding "fake news".[76][77] Fox News still keeps both the "Fair & Balanced" and "Most Watched. Most Trusted." slogans.
International transmission World map, with countries carrying terrestrial FNC in red and satellite providers in orange Countries where Fox News is provided The Fox News Channel feed is available internationally via a number of providers, while Fox Extra segments provide alternate programming.[283] Fox News is carried in more than 40 other countries. Australia In Australia, FNC is broadcast on the dominant pay television provider Foxtel, which is 65%% owned by News Corp Australia, the Australian arm of News Corp and the sister company of 21st Century Fox which owns FNC. Local cable news channel Sky News Australia is wholly owned by News Corp Australia[284] and is therefore FNC's de facto sister channel, although has formal partnerships with FNC competitor CNN as well as both ABC News and CBS News.[285] Brazil Since 2002, FNC has been broadcast to Brazil; however, commercials are replaced with Fox Extra. It is available in packages of Vivo TV. Canada Fox had initially planned to launch a joint venture with Canwest's Global Television Network, tentatively named Fox News Canada, which would have featured a mixture of U.S. and Canadian news programming. As a result, the CRTC denied a 2003 application requesting permission for Fox News Channel to be carried in Canada. However, in March 2004, a Fox executive said the venture had been shelved; in November of that year, the CRTC added Fox News to its whitelist of foreign channels that may be carried by television providers.[286] Mexico The channel's international feed is being carried by cable provider Izzi Telecom. France Fox News is available on cable through French Internet provider Free on channel 352. As of Spring 2017, the channel was no longer found on the provider Orange's lineup.[citation needed] India It is avaliable through Disney plus hotstar. Indonesia In Indonesia, It is available in Channel 335 in pay TV provider Indovision. Ireland See: Fox News#United Kingdom & Ireland. Israel In Israel, FNC is broadcast on Channel 105 of the satellite provider Yes, as well as being carried on Cellcom TV and Partner TV.[287] It is also broadcast on channel 200 on cable operator HOT.[288] Italy In Italy, FNC is broadcast on SKY Italia. Fox news was launched on Stream TV in 2001, and moved to SKY Italia in 2003. Japan Although service to Japan ceased in summer 2003, it can still be seen on Americable (distributor for American bases),[289] Mediatti (Kadena Air Base)[290] and Pan Global TV Japan.[291] Netherlands In the Netherlands, Fox News has been carried by cable providers UPC Nederland and CASEMA, and satellite provider Canaldigitaal; all have dropped the channel in recent years. At this time, only cable provider Caiway (available in a limited number of towns in the central part of the country) is broadcasting the channel. The channel was also carried by IPTV provider KNIPPR (owned by T-Mobile). New Zealand In New Zealand, FNC is broadcast on Channel 088 of pay satellite operator SKY Network Television's digital platform. It was formerly broadcast overnight on free-to-air UHF New Zealand TV channel Prime (owned by SKY); this was discontinued in January 2010, reportedly due to an expiring broadcasting license.[292] Fox News' former parent company News Corporation has a stake in both SKY and Prime. Pakistan In Pakistan, Fox News Channel is available on PTCL Smart TV and a number of cable and IPTV operators. Philippines In the Philippines, Fox News Channel was available on Cignal Digital TV channel 131 and G Sat Channel 50. Scandinavia Between 2003 and 2006, in Sweden and the other Scandinavian countries, FNC was broadcast 16 hours a day on TV8 (with Fox News Extra segments replacing U.S. advertising). Fox News was dropped by TV8 and replaced by German news channel Deutsche Welle in September 2006. Singapore In Singapore, FNC is broadcast on channel 702 on pay cable operator StarHub TV digital platform. It also broadcasts its sister channel, Sky News. South Africa In South Africa, FNC is broadcast on StarSat.[293] The most popular pay television operator, DStv, does not offer FNC in its channel bouquet.[294] United Kingdom & Ireland FNC was also carried in the United Kingdom by Sky, which was 40-percent owned by 21st Century Fox at the time, and operates its own domestic news channel Sky News. On August 29, 2017, Sky dropped Fox News; the broadcaster said its carriage was not "commercially viable" due to average viewership of fewer than 2,000 viewers per day. The company said the decision was unrelated to 21st Century Fox's proposed acquisition of the remainder of Sky plc (which ultimately led to a bidding war that resulted in its acquisition by Comcast instead).[295] |
Soldier397 (talk) 11:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Soldier397, No bias towards any candidate? Really? Or do you mean no bias towards any Republican candidate? Even that's not true. Guy (help!) 12:35, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Trump and Fox News
I think this article mentions the fact that Fox News generally supports President Trump. This article shows that might be changing. --Comment by Selfie City (talk about my contributions) 17:46, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Trump has been criticizing Fox lately. He is seen occasionally tweeting about how One America News is better, and—who knows?—maybe the president will ditch the former in favor of the latter. FreeMediaKid! 06:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
web site starting in December 1995
The source used doesn´t say anywhere that it was created then, a new source needs to be put there2600:1702:1A10:24F0:2DF1:6E08:ECAA:B689 (talk) 09:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Remove Undue Weight Tag
As this tag was placed in March and still no arguments have made to support leaving the tag, I would like to get a consensus to remove it. RemoveSlipandslide (talk) 19:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- I think no arguments have been made since April 2018. Two years by now. Anyone with specific proposals on the exact problematic content? Or we can remove the tags. starship.paint (talk) 03:18, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- There is clearly a problem.... extremely imbalanced. I assume all would agree with that. It needs major consolidation instead of a tit-for-tat format. Reads like daily news releases added day by day reported by its competitors.--Moxy 🍁 03:27, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
FDU study?
I was surprised not to see mention in the article of either of the Fairleigh Dickinson studies (like this one) about news consumption. They've been covered pretty extensively by e.g. Business Insider (among many others), drew a response by Fox, as well as a response-response. I see a couple mentions of it in the talk page archives, but presumably before it got as much coverage as it did. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:50, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Rhododendrites: - go ahead and try to add it? starship.paint (talk) 05:41, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Identification as a "Conservative" News network in 1st line
I question the necessity of calling Fox News a "conservative" network in the first line, when its conservative political slant is already extensively covered in the second half of the lead.
The other problem with this wording is, as a news network, Fox covers things other than politics. For example, the deaths of famous people, crimes, international tragedies, natural disasters, etc. This is just general news that has nothing to do with partisanship or a conservative spin. Therein lies the problem with calling Fox a conservative network in the first sentence. Fox is a news network that has a significant conservative slant in its political coverage but not all of its coverage is political. Hence, calling it conservative in the first line is gratuitous when we've already covered the conservative aspect of their political programing throughout the rest of the article in great detail. Amorals (talk) 16:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- "Conservative" is not used to characterize obituaries or football scores. It is a category of news and editorial commentary. So it is not gratuitous. SPECIFICO talk 17:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I think you miss the point User:Specifico, or at least you may be unintentionally making the point for me, that Fox news does in fact cover obituaries and football scores, so just calling it a conservative network implies all it does is 100% political news and editorial commentary. Therefore, it seems gratuitous when you already extensively cover that aspect of its programing in the 2nd half of the lead.
- I didn't write this article, so I didn't already do anything here. Most daily media cover deaths and sports. Fox's brand and its revenue relate to its conservative editorial slant and its conservative evenening cable TV programming. That's a fact and that's why it's widely tagged "conservative" -- regardless of whether that label really does it justice. SPECIFICO talk 19:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- It's a conservative network, or, if you prefer, a conservative channel, according to books, newspapers, commentators. That's what Roger Ailes, a former press aide to Nixon, set out to create. Guy (help!) 20:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
MSNBC is a Progressive Network and so is CNN according to books and cable executive that is a fact!Guitarguy2323 (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
This two-part reversion is not trivial or UNDUE content
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fox_News&diff=966779267&oldid=966777817
The first part is yet another element that is reflective of a pattern described in the last sentence of the lead and needs to be documented in the body. The second part is about an organized effort to get sponsors to drop major FNC hosts, which appears to be yielding significant results, causing Murdoch to create a team to combat it.
Both parts should be restored. soibangla (talk) 22:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- The first part got almost no coverage so yeah undue. I like the scare quotes around error though, nice touch. The second part is mostly to do with specific shows, on those articles it might be due, here not a lot of impact over all. PackMecEng (talk) 23:05, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- https://www.google.com/search?q=fox+news+crops+trump+ghislaine yields quite a few, actually. We can add them to the restored edit. soibangla (talk) 00:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Still fails weight in the long term view of the company. Give it a few weeks and see if it is still a thing I suppose. Until then it is a clear WP:NOTNEWS. PackMecEng (talk) 01:03, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- https://www.google.com/search?q=fox+news+crops+trump+ghislaine yields quite a few, actually. We can add them to the restored edit. soibangla (talk) 00:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
The Final Lead paragraph.
This paragraph is combative and bised using biased sources. Have a seperate section in the main article. Or at least describe CNN and MSNBC as extremely biased for Democrats which is a fact. Wikipedia should be unbiased and this lead looks like a 'progressive' hit job.
I have no issue with it being called conservative because thats what they brand themselves as at least a majority of the newscasters employed at the channel. but at least be fair and have the same type of lead for CNN and MSNBCGuitarguy2323 (talk) 20:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- We follow what reliable sources have written about the subject, even if some editors find that inconvenient. The last paragraph is fine. - MrX 🖋 21:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
LOL It really isn't and your reliable sources are media matters and vox not "unbiased" or respectable. There are many reliable sources that say MSNBC and CNN are anti trump progressive networks even the heads of the stations have said that.
Guitarguy2323 (talk) 23:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- I realize that Media Matters has been demonized as a "Soros-funded radical left-wing propaganda hate site" on Fox News and elsewhere, conditioning many to reflexively dismiss it on sight without ever bothering to actually examine it. But Media Matters provides videos and transcripts from conservative sources that are objectively indisputable, and thus should be viewed as reliable regardless of whatever commentary or characterizations the Media Matters editors may provide about it. Many conservatives despise Media Matters because the site watches what they say and publicizes their lies. And liars generally don't like being exposed as liars. soibangla (talk) 23:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Media Matters was literally founded by a Democratic Operative(David Brock). I am not a conservative but to say media matters does good work is bull. CNN and MSNBC have had reliable sources call them out as well and they were considered State TV and the Operative Arm of the Democratic Party as well should I edit that into their article leads? Cause you literally have CNN as non partisan which it is not Guitarguy2323 (talk) 00:17, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Guitarguy2323: You're being a wee-bit disingenuous. Media Matters was "literally founded" by former conservative journalist, David Brock. Prior to starting Media Matters, David Brock had been a conservative journalist for the conservative magazine The American Spectator, editor of a conservative magazine Insight on the News (sister publication to conservative newspaper The Washington Times), and had been a fellow at the conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation, In 2002 David Brock wrote a book titled, Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative explaining why he is no longer a conservative. At WP we follow what RS report in order to avoid making mistakes like you did. BetsyRMadison (talk) 15:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Media Matters was literally founded by a Democratic Operative(David Brock). I am not a conservative but to say media matters does good work is bull. CNN and MSNBC have had reliable sources call them out as well and they were considered State TV and the Operative Arm of the Democratic Party as well should I edit that into their article leads? Cause you literally have CNN as non partisan which it is not Guitarguy2323 (talk) 00:17, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- If you have reliable sources calling CNN/MSNBC "State TV and the Operative Arm of the Democratic Party," I strongly encourage you to add them to the leads of those articles. Hannity doesn't count. soibangla (talk) 00:33, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
You are now contradicting yourself you said that Hannity doesnt count but you will allow media matters which is the Democratic version of Hannity? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guitarguy2323 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Last few sentences should be moved to the body and the "critics" sentence with its academic sources restore. Lead full of media sources as of now.--Moxy 🍁 01:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Democratic Politicians and Liberal Pundits and Academics have accused Fox of being unfair to Democrats while portraying Republicans in Positive light should work fine. The entire paragraph is a biased hit job.Guitarguy2323 (talk) 01:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- We use WP:RS here. Please stop trying to push your personal views and personal "facts". O3000 (talk) 01:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Look at the final lead paragraph again then come back to me. Again all your "reliable sources" and "facts" are from OPINION columnists at left leaning sites On MSNBC, Joy Reid, Brian Williams, Rachel Maddow are all Democratic Party members like all the conservatives at fox its really not that hard. Jim Acosta Chris Coumo and Don Lemon are also registered democrats and progressives. The pargraph needs to be cleaned up or at least neutral like "Critcs of Fox news" Or at least have a separate section cause you are really showing your bias and un neutralityGuitarguy2323 (talk) 03:00, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
I wholeheartedly agree with GuitarGuy2323. The Final lead paragraph is absolutely ridiculous. MrWendalyeah (talk) 14:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Repetitive text
Why is the text in third paragraph of the introduction also repeated word-for-word under Political alignment? Zeph1 (talk) 22:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- That is an interesting question. Using the Find feature on an Internet browser and copying and pasting into the field literally all of the paragraph, I can confirm that it is a verbatim copy of the other text under Political alignment. I feel as if this article is trying to give us the idea that the news channel is conservative. The point is not to dispute that claim; it is that the article more than succeeds in achieving that purpose. Apart from the massive cleanup any reasonable editor knows that this article needs, I feel we can merge some of the content and put some other parts into Fox News controversies. Personally, I would also characterize MSNBC as progressive like the HuffPost. It may not be notably as progressive as Fox News is conservative, but as the "antithesis" of Fox News according to a Washington Post op-ed, it would appear to justify considering at least that network's commentary as progressive. This is saying something, because I would not use progressive to broadly characterize CNN, ABC, or CBS. FreeMediaKid! 03:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Looking over the article history, it is because someone attempted to move the longstanding paragraph out of the lead; their changes to the lead were reverted, but their creation of a new section was not. I think it's fair to say that it's a section that ought to exist, though (it is an aspect of Fox News that has received extremely heavy coverage in high-quality sources) so probably the best thing to do is to expand and elaborate on it until the two are no longer copies of each other. --Aquillion (talk) 06:19, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Fox's deliberately tilted coverage
See: https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/14/media/fox-news-unmasking-obamagate/index.html
"News that Trump's Justice Department had concluded without charges being filed landed with a thud on Fox News. Martha MacCallum covered it on her Tuesday night show, but a search of transcripts did not turn up any other instances in which Fox covered it on air. The story was briefly featured on Fox News' homepage before being removed Wednesday afternoon. Even when it was featured on the network's website, it was not given the same play as the initial unmasking stories were in May. The episode marks yet another instance in which Fox News and its hosts have dishonestly hyped an innocuous national security procedure into a supposed scandal, only to later watch it quietly fall apart before moving on to feed something else to their audience. A Fox News spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday. It's difficult to overstate how much Fox News promoted the unmasking story in May, never mind promoting it as an insidious plot against Trump."
As a pattern of behavior, this OUGHT to be prominently covered in the article. 76.31.177.30 (talk) 22:35, 14 October 2020 (UTC)