Talk:Nushki incident
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 3 July 2024[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Nushki incident be renamed and moved to Nushki shooting. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Nushki incident → Nushki shooting – The title should state what happened. 2A00:23CC:B4AA:2F01:8CCD:1CFF:FEBB:539F (talk) 04:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per MOS:AT. None of the sources in the article call it a shooting, so neither should we. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 05:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's not clear what part of MOS:AT you are actually referring to, but while the sources all describe this as an "incident" they also make multiple mentions of the vehicle and passengers being shot. I would argue that WP:CRITERIA support this move, specifically on the basis of recognizability, naturalness, and precision.Polyamorph (talk) 17:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per MOS:AT. None of the sources in the article call it a shooting, so neither should we. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 05:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support per my comment above. Polyamorph (talk) 17:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. There doesn't seem to be a single WP:COMMONNAME among sources, so it makes sense to fall back on other criteria to determine the best title. To that end, the increased WP:PRECISION of "shooting" makes it preferable. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 18:45, 10 July 2024 (UTC)