User talk:Kepler-1229b

This is Kepler-1229b's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 30 days

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Proposed deletion of Ainu-Minoan languages

The article Ainu-Minoan languages has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SIGCOV. Non-notable fringe hypothesis that only exists in the universe of self-published publications by two authors who maintain a self-published pseudo-journal to promote their stuff.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Austronesier (talk) 05:27, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mehweb language has been accepted

Mehweb language, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 10:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Assimilated"

Hi User:Kepler-1229b, switching "extinct as a tribe" to "assimilated", for example on the Secotan, raises challenges. Native American tribes being sociopolitical entities, tribes can cease to exist while individual descendants survive. "Extinct as a tribe" is only used on Native American articles when the tribes ceased to exist for a century or more; not where existence is nebulous (for instance with Hasinai or Kalapuya, who aren't a politically independent tribe today but are still a visible part of an existing tribe). Arguably, all Native American tribes are assimilation to some degree today (e.g. most tribal members speak English and wear Western dress) and degrees of assimilation would be subjective. Where it's known a tribe merged into another, that can be phrased as "merged into Xxx" with a citation, but often historic tribes merge into multiple groups. Yuchitown (talk) 21:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Feel free to revert any incorrect additions I make. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 21:34, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, just wanted to reach out to you about it first. Cheers, Yuchitown (talk) 21:35, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Split requests not needed; just do it

It's not necessary to request to split the ethnic group articles with language information. If you have the knowledge about how language articles are formatted, you can just make the split and create a new separate language article. Otherwise, they'll just sit there with the split templates indefinitely (especially considering no discussions have been created on the talk pages.) Yuchitown (talk) 14:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I will be more WP:BOLD here. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 21:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lunar Saros 156 summary

Template:Lunar Saros 156 summary has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]