User talk:Ikan Kekek

Hello, everybody! If you'd like to discuss anything with me, please post new topics at the bottom of the page and sign the posts with 4 tildes (the ~ key) in a row. Thanks!

Currently inactive discussions can be found at User talk:Ikan Kekek/archive. Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:00, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

against odds, the sul link has worked

trust all is well with the music and all, JarrahTree (talk) 01:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

It's good to hear from you! I've been dealing with some hand/arm troubles, but otherwise, things are OK. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

our state library some ten or twenty years ago used to have a music listening area (long gone now), and on the notice boards were fliers for feldrenkrais and alexander technique practitioners with their intent to attract musicians requiring attention. JarrahTree (talk) 09:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Alexander Technique is one of the things I'm doing. Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

oh dear the SUL work around failed for a while, it is like dancing with a drunken cat, I think I have found a way in again...

I am not sure I have really got a handle on the lengthy discussion as an Australian reading the talk page at the Australia article, maybe I would not be much help, as a 60+ native born west australian, some of the assertions look like crap -give me walk in Manhattan, or Ceduna anytime than offering generalisations about Australian transitions in culture in the last 50 years... Trust all is well. The more I think about that lengthy discussion, I am trying to prevent myself from adding anything further sigh.... JarrahTree (talk) 07:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

BTW my apologies - I had not given a link to the background info on what I call SUL - probably more correctly called Unified login...

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Unified_login [User:JarrahTree|JarrahTree]] (talk) 07:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

I understand. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

I am very pleased to hear that you have been travelling! excellent! JarrahTree (talk) 02:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons

I'm a veteran Wikimedia editor but new to Wikivoyage. Can you explain why it is difficult to link recent Wikimedia Commons files on Wikivoyage? Thanks, Buaidh (talk) 03:03, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

If it is, that's something new to me. Have you been using double square brackets and putting the filename inside? For example: [[File:Filename|thumb|Caption]] Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:41, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Yes. An example is here:

An example.

.

Yours aye, Buaidh (talk) 16:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

I found no such filename in a Commons search. Why do you think the file is on Commons? Was it there but speedily deleted or something? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

In that case one should see a deletion log entry or something (the filename doesn't hint on anything that could have been censored). It isn't on Wikipedia in English either. –LPfi (talk) 20:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Indeed. So I don't understand the issue. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

The file is located at File:Olde Town Arvada Station.jpg. I don't understand why you can't find it. Buaidh (talk) 04:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

The reason why the example above produces a redlink is because the file name is misspelled (the correct file name starts with "Olde" like in the link, not just "Old"). --Ypsilon (talk) 05:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Duh... Thank you. That is a pretty obvious mistake. Buaidh (talk) 16:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Easy to make, though. Glad we got to the bottom of this. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

A goat for you!

Thank you for your good work keeping this site accurate.

Mossy.VanDerLinde (talk) 01:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Sure thing. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Brendan

Comment at Wikivoyage:Vandalism_in_progress#Brendan? Pashley (talk) 02:27, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Question

Would an article about the Temple Mount specifically be an article worth creating? Christian Traveler (talk) 06:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Looks like someone tried to create it years ago and didn't finish...

https://en.wikivoyage.org/w/index.php?title=Temple_Mount&oldid=2342001 Christian Traveler (talk) 06:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

I doubt it's a complex enough site to merit its own article. St. Peter's doesn't have one. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

The kinds of places of worship that have their own articles are Angkor Archaeological Park, Borobudur and Prambanan. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Maybe it could warrant a travel topic? Maybe call it "A Day at the Temple Mount"? Christian Traveler (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

I don't know, but you could try creating a draft in your sandbox (like User:Christian Traveler/A Day at the Temple Mount) and when you'd like others to look at and perhaps edit it, link it in the Travellers' pub. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Should we warn an IP editor?

Special:Contributions/148.109.13.139 just made some politically-motivated edits to the China and Hong Kong articles? Should we warn them on their talk page? The dog2 (talk) 23:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

If you feel it's necessary, go ahead, but I'd couch it as ttcf and Be fair#Political disputes. The main point is that Wikivoyage doesn't seek to score political points but does provide information people who may be traveling somewhere should know. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Political leanings in Ukraine

Admittedly, we wouldn't know for sure how the population thinks now, but if you look at electoral maps of Ukraine prior to Euromaidan in 2014, the eastern and southern provinces of Ukraine (including Crimea), which were mostly Russian-speaking, mostly voted for pro-Russia candidates, while the central and western provinces, which are mostly Ukrainian-speaking, mostly voted for pro-US/EU candidates. It was covered in this lecture by University of Chicago professor John Mearsheimer, who is quite well-known in political science circles as one of America's foremost geopolitical scholars today. The dog2 (talk) 20:51, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Mearsheimer is now considered to hold fringe views on Ukraine, but this just highlights how we should avoid getting trapped in these discussions. If it is controversial, let's avoid the discussion and focus on travel information. Wikivoyage does not need to take a stand on these issues. Readers should get their information on this sort thing from better sources than a travel guide. Ground Zero (talk) 21:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

The other thing is that every region of Ukraine voted for independence in 1991, though by a lower percentage and with more absenteeism in Crimea than in other regions. It's a fallacy that being Russian-speaking equates to wanting to be part of Russia. Odesa and Kharkiv are or at least were Russian-speaking until they were repeatedly bombed. What do you think most of their inhabitants think about Russia now? But Ground Zero really has the best response. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

This is a bit of a tangent, and I am in no way suggesting that we include any of this in any of our articles, but Mearsheimer's views may not be as fringe as you think. According to opinion polls, less than 30% of Americans are in favour of sending American troops into Ukraine to fight the Russians, but more than 50% of Americans are in favour of sending American troops to Taiwan to fight the Chinese should war break out there. And Nikki Haley has in fact promised that if she gets elected president, her first order of business will be to go war with China. The dog2 (talk) 00:47, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Cite the opinion poll and provide the wording of the questions. Also, Haley will not be elected, but come on, she said she'll attack China on Day 1 in the alternate universe in which she won? Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Here's an article citing one of those polls: . In this particular one, it shows that 60% of the American public support U.S. military intervention in Taiwan. The dog2 (talk) 02:23, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. Their methodology seems problematic:

"To obtain the sample, YouGov used a sample matching approach to recruit respondents and generate a representative sample of the American population. YouGov sample is generated through an opt-in survey panel, composed of approximately 1 million US residents who agreed to participate in YouGov’s Web surveys. Panel members are recruited using multiple methods to help ensure diversity in the panel population. Recruiting methods include Web advertising campaigns (public surveys), permission-based email campaigns, partner-sponsored solicitations, SMS-to-Web recruitment (voter registration- based sampling). YouGov invites panel members by email and/or SMS, depending on how the panelist has opted to be contacted. All invited respondents opted-in to receive survey invitations from YouGov. To recruit a representative sample, YouGov recruited panelists to this survey by their previously provided answers to YouGov profile questions. At the recruitment stage respondents were invited based on their fit to interlocking variables of (gender x race x age x education). To match survey participants to the YouGov population frame, more interviews than needed are collected. The final sample of respondents to this survey were matched to a more complete population frame, selecting the closest matches to the population. Completed interviews were weighted to the sampling frame using propensity scores. Population weights were normalized to equal sample size."

I have no idea how reliable their results are. I'm very skeptical that 50-60% of Americans want U.S. troops to die in the defense of Taiwan, which is not to say that I oppose a U.S. commitment to help Taiwan defend itself. Also, you just can't rely on a single poll for anything. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, political leanings of the responders is critical here. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 04:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ As web surveys are much less expensive than phone or snailmail ones, and you probably get high response rates from opt-in panels, an approach like this is common. By comparing sample profile statistics with population statistics, one can test for bias, although not necessarily reliably.

Extending this to giving more weight to answers from people from groups under-represented in the sample (or choosing a sub-sample with a less biased profile) lessens the bias in the profiles, and is a commonly used strategy.

However, there is no guarantee that a person from an under-represented category represents all the category well. What about Democrats reached through Trump's X feed? Democrats are certainly under-represented there, but giving greater weight to such odd Democrats might give worse results than not using such weights and just have fewer Democrats in the sample (and admitting the sample isn't representative of the population at large).

Mostly the survey institutes try their best to get good samples, but there are no statistic measures that can test the biases introduced by the sampling methods (other than indirectly by comparing survey results with similar surveys with a better sample, or by comparing relevant variables in the original sample with those of the general population).

–LPfi (talk) 12:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Here, they tried to get a "better diversity" (essentially less bias, I assume) by using different methods of recruitment. Adding a bad method to the other ones can give more diversity, but might increase the bias. For the several-methods approach to work, you need methods that complement each other. I don't know whether web advertising campaigns and permission-based email campaigns reach different-enough populations to motivate not just using the better one. I hope those responsible did test the profiles of these different populations to be able to conclude they got a better sample this way (that's up to their professionalism, both in skill and in wish for correct results, especially as commercial survey institutes seldom publish a thorough discussion on their methodologies). Anyway, I assume any opt-in panel will include more extremists than an unbiased sample. –LPfi (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

An opt-in panel is likely to bias results in that their opinions may well be different from everyone who would refuse to participate, regardless of any other demographics. That's a big problem in polling now. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

My understanding is that the reason why most Americans oppose sending U.S. troops into Ukraine to fight the Russians is because of fear over nuclear escalation, given that Russia has the most number of nukes in the world. I wonder if the average American is aware that China also has nukes, albeit about only one tenth the number that the U.S. and Russia have. After all, a war between the U.S. and China over Taiwan is very likely to go nuclear, especially if China manages to sink an aircraft carrier, and the American people start calling for Chinese blood to avenge the deaths of their soldiers. And not to mention, such a war is also very likely to escalate into World War III, given that Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, India, Canada, Australia, the UK, New Zealand, France, Germany and Italy are all likely to join the Americans in fighting for Taiwan. If the poll numbers are accurate, perhaps it reflects that the average citizen in Middle America thinks of China as a backward country that the U.S. military can easily overwhelm, and isn't aware that China could potentially destroy New York City and Los Angeles with their nukes, and all those other countries that join the American-led coalition might see their cities get nuked too. The dog2 (talk) 17:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Again, quite apart from methodological issues with this poll, basing anything on a single poll is senseless. Yet you are engaging in flights of fancy. I don't think the Chinese dictator is any more interested in getting his country nuked than Putin is. Can we please end this discussion? Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

yeah, agreed, how does the stuff above relates to travel activities? We're good and fine without mentioning this stuff. This is not WikiStatistics, this is not WikiPolitics, and very very removed from WV:Tone. Ibaman (talk) 17:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

3 years on...

I just happened to make my 80,000th edit today – have to say, thank you for being a great mentor to me over the past 3 years on Wikivoyage. I don't think I'd have been this passionate for Wikivoyage had I not had a mentor like you. Thank you again, Ikan. (side note: surely I'm not the only one to find this wild – have I really hit the edit button that much?) --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 11:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Glad I've been helpful. I have mixed feelings about how much time I spend editing sites that don't pay me for my work. But I do it because I enjoy it. Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:27, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Man, I forgot that this was all unpaid work. It's definitely worth putting your time into something you're passionate about, though. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 20:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

On former citizens

To answer your question, your passport lists your place of birth, so that is a hint. The way Indian legislation is worded is a little ambiguous. Have a look at this document for an example. Presumably, that means that someone who was born a Chinese citizen, but later immigrated to the U.S. and obtained U.S. citizenship is not eligible to obtain the permit in question, while a U.S. citizen with no connection to China whatsoever is. I'm not sure how it affects say, a third generation Malaysian of Chinese descent. The dog2 (talk) 21:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

I see. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Cheese

	Some cheese for you!
	Because you are awesome. Amoxicillin on a Boat (talk) 17:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Cheese

	Some cheese for you!
	Because you are awesome. Amoxicillin on a Boat (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. I like cheese. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:22, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Your user page

I think you might want to remove "I will be away from January 9-17, 2023 and might not be reachable quickly on some of those days.", because it's definitely well past January 2023! ;-) --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 03:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll be on another trip soon. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

No worries. Enjoy your trip :-). --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 04:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. It's not quite yet. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Wikivoyage:User_ban_nominations#70.68.168.129

(redacted)

I have redacted a couple of incivil comments but won't take admin action as I am directly involved in this dispute and believe it would be inappropriate to do so. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 06:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Safe travels

Hi, Ikan, I realise it's not Monday yet, but enjoy your trip to Italy! I know it's a bit early, but I'm off on a camping trip tomorrow so here's some early wishes (and sorry you had to face those disgusting personal attacks above). --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 07:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

I didn't see them. Thanks, and have a great camping trip! Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Berlin

As I was saying, how great that you are enjoying your time in the awesome big city, "poor but sexy", great metro system, great sights. I most often have stayed close to Hermannstraße and Tempelhof Park in Neukolln, and Prezlauer Berg once, but it's all really nice and full of history, the Berliner Schloß and its metro station must be fully finished now. Happy voyages in good old Europe. Ibaman (talk) 00:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! I've had a good time so far. I just got here from Munich 2 days ago. Munich is so much more diverse than it was 10 years ago, though it was already pretty diverse then. There are way more Arabs, and we had some fantastic Arab food our last night there. I did my own seder today with my partner, 2 of our friends and 1 of hers whom I hadn't met before. I was the only Jew at the seder, and we all had a wonderful time. I got some of my best ingredients, including 2 small chickens, from the local Turkish supermarket. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Great to hear you've had an excellent time in Deutschland! --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 01:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Are you back from camping? How was/is your trip? Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Haha, yeah, I came back on the 11th. It was great, though we were rained out with a storm on one of the days (we took retreat inside the car that day), but an experience worth it. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta) 11:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Armillary

I was a bit surprised to see you revert a recent edit of mine on the London/South page: first, the link was not to Wikipedia but to Wiktionary; second, the page explicitly does not comply with the policy you mentioned in saying (and I quote) "look it up!". The reason I added the link was annoyance at this unhelpful parenthetical. Is this how the policy is meant to be implemented? QuartierLatin1968 (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

To quote from the beginning of Wikivoyage:Links to Wikipedia: "Wikivoyage articles should be as complete as possible in and of themselves. Essential information about a topic should be included in the Wikivoyage article, rather than relying on a link to Wikipedia." So if you want to add information, please add it, and cite your source in an edit summary. It's completely fine to paraphrase, or if necessary, quote from another Wikimedia site, as long as you cite your source in an edit summary or note on the article's talk page. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:37, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes, but the operative word in what you quoted was "Wikipedia", surely? The Wikivoyage article is not more "complete as possible" the way it's been left now; all it wanted was a definition. Well, I suppose there's no point arguing over it. QuartierLatin1968 (talk) 15:40, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

WV:Goals and non-goals: we don't want to be, or read like, an encyclopaedia or dictionary. WV:External links#What not to link to: "We also do not provide links to source information or provide references—travel guides do not use footnotes! If a source looks like it could be of use to subsequent editors of a guide, or if some information you add appears suspect, mention it (or link to it) on the talk page – not in the article itself." There's also WV:IL#Don't overlink. We like to keep this travel guide very clean, indeed. Ibaman (talk) 16:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Tip for detecting copyvios more easily

Hey Ikan (cc Ground Zero as you might also find this useful – I'm just too lazy to post this twice :P), I'm sure you are now aware of Earwig's Copyvio Tool which was the tool I used on Talk:Tokyo/Ueno, which is far better and more accurate than trying to search for copyvios manually (even more so when you enable Turnitin). But, I am perfectly aware that it, along with a plethora of a thousand other links, can easily get lost in your bookmarks bar.

To overcome this, I use a gadget called MoreMenu (relevant documentation on Meta). In short, it adds far more options in the top right-hand corner of a page (these things) that you'd get on the default menu (ignore the "More" and "TW" in the screenshot – those are additional gadgets I've installed) and there's a button that gives a link to the copyvio tool (Page > Analysis). Installing the gadget is very easy, just add the following text to m:User:Ikan Kekek/global.js, and you should be set.

mw.loader.load('https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&title=MediaWiki:MoreMenu.import.js');

This is just a suggestion, so you are free to ignore it at your will. I'm more than happy to help if needed.

--SHB2000 (t | c | m) 12:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, appreciated. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Reverting on mobile

Are you also having the same issues as me where you can't easily use the undo button on mobile? --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 07:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

I can revert the latest change by going into the article history (it's not so obvious that an icon that looks like a revert icon actually pulls up the history, but I figured that out), selecting the current and immediately previous change, clicking "compare changes" or something similar, and then reverting the latest change, but I couldn't see a button for reverting a change made like 4 changes ago when I performed the same procedures up to comparing two versions. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

I'm having the same issue. Are you an iOS user? --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 09:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Yes indeed. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

I've always thought it was just bad UI. Mobile editing does suck :-(. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 21:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Yeah. Fortunately, I also have my laptop here. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Request

Hi, are you able to take a look at Special:AbuseFilter/53? Cheers, --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 11:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for the late reply. I read it. Not sure I understand it, but if it works, great! Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

I have a few comments on it, some of which may apply more broadly. –LPfi (talk) 07:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Goodness me, but it works! See Andnazzhr97 (talk · contribs), who I've just blocked indefinitely as a block-evading sockpuppet. SHB2000 (t | c | m) 23:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

$

Probably not USD, might be Argentinian pesos because Puerto Iguazú is on the Argentinian side of the falls. But the author should really specify what currency it is.

Surprisingly many currencies in the Western Hemisphere use $ as their symbol. In addition, for large purchases (home electronics, cars etc.), and services aimed at tourists, prices are often in US dollars. Ypsilon (talk) 05:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, I think the IP clearly meant pesos in that context. AR$4000 is US$21. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 07:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

I think the ARS-template needs updating. At the moment AR$ 4000 is just US$ 4.40 FredTC (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, guys. Is it clear in context which currency is being referred to? Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

foodship spam accounts

I created a filter for it – do see Special:AbuseFilter/55 if you want to give any input. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 06:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

No comment except thanks! I saw only two, but there were bound to be more. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

I blocked two before earlier in the day and have reported all four accounts to m:SRG, so hopefully those will be the last. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 06:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

...and they've been locked by EPIC. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 07:46, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Cannabis in NYC

Ikan, thanks for your edit here, but I admit I'm not quite clear what the intent is. Was the existing text somehow misleading about the ability to smoke on the street in NYC? I don't think NYC is unique in allowing smoking on public streets. Powers ^(talk) 13:37, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

If there are other cities in the state where it's legal to smoke pot on the streets, why are we telling people to reserve it for wide open spaces? Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:20, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Not being from NYC I consider streets to be fairly open spaces. =) I was also taking into account consideration for fellow pedestrians in suggesting plenty of space for smoking. Still, I'm open to other wording; I'm not well versed in this area and would appreciate a suggestion for how to describe where consumption is allowed. Powers ^(talk) 01:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

"Wide open spaces" mean big fields or state parks and such to me. I'll have another look at the text. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

On the topic of copyvios...

Not sure if you remember Taoheedah a while back, who we warned for copyvios. They're now running for the U4C special election, and I queried them about their copyvios + poor communication skills. Just putting it out there since you were also involved and in case if you want to add anything to the questions page. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 02:50, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. I think I'll see how she responds to your question.

Best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Looks like voting has started and still no response from her (clear oppose from me) :-(. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 01:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

How do I vote? Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

I seem to be ineligible to vote? Seemingly blocked on some wiki??? Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

I can't even post to Meta. The reason is: "Block will expire in 2 years

Reason

There are multiple blocks against your account and/or IP address" Why? Because I refuse to disable the security feature on my iPhone, and whoever wants me to can go fuck themselves, as far as I'm concerned. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

I gave you IPBE, so you should be good now – unfortunately, that security feature has been abused by countless LTAs. SHB2000 (t | c | m) 04:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

just hit the link on https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/vote/1618, which should work now. SHB2000 (t | c | m) 04:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. My position is someone who is a user in good standing should be able to use any standard security feature of any browser. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm of the same belief and so is the general Wikimedia community, the only issue is that there isn't any way to distinguish who is in good-standing (unless they're an admin, which is how I'm able to get past that block on Meta), and this has unfortunately been abused countless times by numerous LTAs (to evade blocks).

Since this isn't a Meta specific thing, I'd recommend requesting global IP block exemption on m:SRIPBE, which would help you get past global range blocks on any wiki (including Commons, unless the IP is also blocked locally) as you have a valid-use case of it. It's what most zh users (barring zhwiki, which often also locally blocks proxies) do to get past using a VPN since Wikipedia (and some sister sites) are blocked in China. The only reason you can get by here is because you're an admin. It's not ideal, but it's also the best that can be done for now. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 08:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

It seems to me, someone who is autopatrolled on at least one wiki should be presumed to be a good-faith Wikimedian, unless demonstrated otherwise. I'm not really inclined to seek a global block exemption as some kind of unusual special privilege. Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

The issue is there isn't any way to automatically check if a user is autopatrolled on at least one medium-sized wiki (small wikis are debatable), at least not without using an external tool (which can't do anything on-wiki) – which is why I'd recommend requesting GIPBE since as things currently stand, it can only be done manually. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 03:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Noted, but I'm still disinclined to apply. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Fair enough – one thing, though, the m:Community Wishlist is open right now, so if you do want to suggest a feature that would automatically handle IPBE, please do make one. (I made a request already so not sure if me making a second one would come out well). --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 10:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

I voted. When do we find out the results? Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

m:Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Election/2024 Special Election just says August, so I presume sometime at the end of the month (since voting formally ends on the 10th). --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 01:36, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, and thanks for helping out. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:24, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Not a problem and glad I could help. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 08:50, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Edit request

Hello! I'm working on one of the wanted categories, but am unable to edit your userpage yet (my home wiki is commons) can you add the category "Bureaucrats of the English Wikivoyage" to your userpage? Thanks!

Alachuckthebuck (talk) 01:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

I don't know how to add a category to my user page. Is it important for me to do so? Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

You don't have to add the catagory directly, the userbox

{{Template:User Wikivoyage/Bureaucrat}} will do it for you. Just add it to your babel userbox and it will fix it.

For future reference, the format for catagories is [[Catagory:foo]].

All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 01:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

OK, but I already tell people on the user page what my status is. I'm not understanding why it was necessary or important to create the category in the first place. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

We have Wikivoyage:Bureaucrats, which has a complete list. Maybe the solution is to delete the category you created. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Generally it's for maintenance purposes, since using Special:ListUsers for gadgets isn't the easiest thing to do. It's pretty much the main reason why such templates exist. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 07:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

OK, in that case, is the title of the category optional? Wouldn't "Bureaucrats" be enough, with the rest understood? Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

I agree – Alachuckthebuck, any thoughts before renaming? --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 03:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

I would say that even if we decide to keep a long name, the word "the" has to be removed. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

No objections, go ahead. All the best -- Chuck ^Talk 22:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Done. Moved the category and edited the text of Template:User Wikivoyage/Bureaucrat to eliminate the word "the." Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Generally on Wikimedia projects some sort of prefix is used to distinguish user and project categories from content categories. For example, Category:User en, w:Category:Wikipedia bureaucrats, and w:Category:Wikipedian clarinetists. Category:Wikivoyage bureaucrats would seem to be the shortest version of that for us. But I also don't quite see the need. What "maintenance purposes" are helped by having a category that has to be manually updated in addition to the Bureaucrats project page? Powers ^(talk) 14:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Any insight, User:Alachuckthebuck and User:SHB2000? Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Real Ale

Hello, I saw your edit summary on Royal Tunbridge Wells: "But does anyplace serve fake ale?". In the UK, Real Ale refers to unpasteurized, unfiltered ale, served without added carbon dioxide. Some beer enthusiasts would say that mass produced keg or can beer from the biggest breweries is "fake ale"! AlasdairW (talk) 20:28, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining! Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Useful

Hello! about (IMO: 8859744) The ship is running on schedule, but it can be incorrect. I thought it (IMO: 8859744) might be useful, but I didn't know if it was possible to use links. for example: https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/details/ships/shipid:350544/mmsi:273445090/imo:8859744/vessel:GIPANIS or https://rfbus.ru/petropavlovsk-kamchatskij-severo-kurilsk?lang=en Kolpaky (talk) 5:55, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

First, if it is useful, please re-add it. In terms of the links, the second one is unusable to me, as I'm spending way too much time with its stupid sliders to prove I'm not a robot. I don't know whether the first link is usable per what not to link to. It's a cool site, though! What do you think, after reading that link? Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

it seemed to me that the information about the position of the ship was interesting. But I don't insist that it's important. Kolpaky (talk) 09:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

I'll defer to your judgment. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)