[go: nahoru, domu]
Wikipedia

Law of the People's Republic of China

The Law of the People's Republic of China, officially referred to as the "socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics," is the legal regime of China, with the separate legal traditions and systems of mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau.

China's legal system is largely a civil law system, although found its root in Great Qing Code and various historical system, largely reflecting the influence of continental European legal systems, especially the German civil law system in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Hong Kong and Macau, the two special administrative regions, although required to observe the constitution and the basic laws and the power of the National People's Congress, are able to largely maintain their legal systems from colonial times.

Since the formation of the People's Republic of China in 1949, the country does not have judicial independence or judicial review as the courts do not have authority beyond what is granted to them by the National People's Congress under a system of unified power. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP)'s Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission maintains effective control over the courts and their personnel.[1]

During the Maoist period (1949–1978), the government had a hostile attitude towards a formalized legal system, because Mao and the CCP "saw the law as creating constraints upon their power." The legal system was attacked as a counter-revolutionary institution, and the concept of law itself was not accepted. Courts were closed, law schools were shut down and lawyers were forced to change professions or be sent to the countryside.[2]

There was an attempt in the mid-1950s to import a socialist legal system based on that of the Soviet Union. But from the start of the Anti-Rightist Campaign in 1957–1959 to the end of the Cultural Revolution around 1976, the PRC lacked most of the features of what could be described as a formal legal system.

This policy was changed in 1979, and Deng Xiaoping and the CCP put into place an "open door" policy, which took on a utilitarian policy to the reconstruction of the social structure and legal system where the law has been used as useful tool to support economic growth.[citation needed] Proposals to create a system of law separate from the CCP were abandoned after the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre.[3] Under the Xi Jinping Administration, the legal system has become further subordinated to the CCP.[4]

History

edit
Main articles: Traditional Chinese law and Legal history of China

China has a tradition of adopting civil law systems. During the Qing Dynasty, the Chinese government hired Japanese legal experts to copy legal systems from Japan in order to modernize the Chinese legal system. This stemmed from the German civil law system.[5] After the establishment of the Republic of China in 1911, the Chinese government maintained the civil law system. Although the CCP abolished all legal systems of the ROC after 1949, its legal system was deeply influenced by the legal system of the Soviet Union, which could also be regarded as a civil law system.[clarification needed]

The development of the current legal system dates from the late 1970s, after the end of the Cultural Revolution. After China's Reform and Opening Up, the CCP emphasized the rule of law as a basic strategy and method for state management.[6]: 110  At the CCP's 13th National Congress in 1987, former CCP general secretary Zhao Ziyang proposed the idea of a system of law independent of the party.[3] The idea was abandoned with the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre.[3] In 1997, Jiang Zemin called for establishing a socialist rule of law at the CCP's 15th National Congress.[6]: 110 

In the 2000s, the Weiquan movement began in the PRC, seeking to advance citizens' rights partly by petitioning for enforcement of existing laws, and partly through activism. Lawyers in the movement have seen some court victories, but in other cases they and their families have been ostracized and even tortured for their activities.[7] In 2007, the doctrine of the Three Supremes was introduced under Hu Jintao, mandating that the judiciary subordinate written law to the interests of the CCP.[8]

On October 27, 2011, the State Council Information Office released the white paper "Socialist Legal System with Chinese Characteristics", announcing that the People's Republic of China has enacted a total of 240 effective laws (including the Constitution), 706 administrative regulations, and more than 8,600 local regulations, and believes that the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics has been formed.[9]

Xi describes the leadership of the CCP as essential to upholding the socialist rule of law and opposes the requirement of judicial independence.[6]: 113–114  During the 18th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, the CCP reinforced that the law remains firmly under the party's leadership.[10] Xi states that the two fundamental aspects of the "socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics" are: (1) that the political and legal organs (including courts, the police, and the procuratorate) must believe in the law and uphold the law and (2) all political and legal officials must follow the CCP.[6]: 115  Xi's view tends to equate the rule of law with the development of legislation.[6]: 112–113  In his writings, Xi has emphasized traditional Chinese concepts including people as the root of the state (mingben), "the ideal of no lawsuit" (tianxia wusong), "respecting rite and stressing law" (longli zhongfa), "virtue first, penalty second" (dezhu xingfu), and "promoting virtue and being prudent in punishment" (mingde shenfa).[6]: 110–111 

The primary laws regarding personal data security and privacy are the 2017 Cyber Security Law, the 2021 Data Security Law, and the 2021 Personal Information Protection Law.[11]: 131–132 

In 2019, the city of Hangzhou established a pilot program artificial intelligence-based Internet Court to adjudicate disputes related to ecommerce and internet-related intellectual property claims.[12]: 124  Parties appear before the court via videoconference and AI evaluates the evidence presented and applies relevant legal standards.[12]: 124 

Sources of law

edit

The highest and ultimate source of legal norms in the PRC is nominally the Constitution of the People's Republic of China. It establishes the framework and principles of government, and lists the fundamental rights and duties of Chinese citizens. In practice, however, although these "fundamental rights" include "freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration" the enforcement of these rights and other elements of the Constitution are subject to the discretion of the CCP's leadership. According to China analyst John Dotson, "[w]hile CCP policy documents are always more important than formal PRC law, the Party-state does use formal laws passed by the National People’s Congress to codify and emphasize Party policies."[13]

Unlike some civil law jurisdictions such as Germany, China does not systematically lay down general principles in its constitution which all administrative regulations and rules must follow. The principles of legislation and the validity and priority of law, rule and administrative regulations are instead listed in the Legislation Law, constitutional provisions, basic laws and laws enacted by the National People's Congress and its standing committee, regulations issued by the State Council and its departments, local laws and regulations, autonomous-zone regulations, legal explanations and treaty norms are all in theory incorporated into domestic law immediately upon promulgation.[citation needed]

Unlike common law jurisdictions, there is no strict precedential concept for case law[12]: 119  and no principle of stare decisis. In addition, there is no case or controversy requirement that would require the Supreme People's Court to limit its decisions to actual cases, and the SPC does issue general interpretations of the law. In practice, lower people's court judges attempt to follow the interpretations of the laws decided by the Supreme People's Court. In addition, unlike common law jurisdictions, higher courts have the power of supervision and guidance, which means that on their own initiative they can reopen a case that has been decided at a lower level.

Courts in the PRC do not have a general power of judicial review which enables them to strike down legislation. However under the Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, they do have authority to invalidate specific acts of the government. In cases where there is a conflict of laws, the process to resolve this conflict is outlined in the Legislation Law of the People's Republic of China, in which an interpretation is requested by the legislative body that is responsible for the law. This process has been criticized both by Western and Chinese legal scholars for being unwieldy and for not allowing for judicial independence and separation of powers.[14]

Varieties of law

edit

PRC governmental directives exist in a hierarchy, which is defined by the Legislation Law of the People's Republic of China. The hierarchy of regulations are

  1. The Constitution of the People's Republic of China
  2. Nationwide laws (全国性法律), which are issued by the National People's Congress
  3. Administrative regulations, which are issued by the State Council
  4. Local decrees, which are issued by local People's Congresses
  5. Administrative and local rules, which are issued by an administrative agency or by a local People's Government

Major areas of law are substantive laws and procedural laws. The former include administrative law, criminal law, civil law or business law, and economic law. These are separated into different branches. For example, contract law is considered a branch of civil law. The latter includes civil procedure law, criminal procedure law and administrative procedure law.[citation needed]

Civil law and Civil Procedure Law

edit

In 1986 the National People's Congress adopted the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China, which helped clarify the scope of the civil law. Article 2 of the document states that the civil law governs personal and property relationships between natural persons and legal persons having equal status. It covers a wide range of topics, including the General Principles, marriage law, property law, contract law, copyright law, and trademark law. From the point of view of some scholars, business law, such as corporation law, bankruptcy law, insurance law, and law on negotiable instruments, is distinguished from civil law.[citation needed]

Until 2021, the PRC did not have a single civil code in force. In its absence, the National People's Congress promulgated Marriage Law, Adoption Law, Succession Law, Contract Law, Law of Rights in Rem, Law of Tort Liability. The first part of the future Civil Code was General Provisions of Civil Law (《民法总则》) adopted in 2017, which was based on General Principles of Civil Law (《民法通则》) adopted in 1986.[citation needed]

On May 28, 2020, the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China was adopted at the third session of the 13th National People's Congress. It came into force on January 1, 2021, on which day Marriage Law, Succession Law, General Principles of Civil Law, Adoption Law, Guarantee Law, Contract Law, Property Law, Tort Law, and General Provisions of Civil Law were repealed.[15][non-primary source needed] Since the Civil Code of the People's Republic China does not include provisions regarding intellectual property, company, or labour, its promulgation did not affect Trademark Law, Patent Law, Copyright Law, Company Law, Partnership Enterprise Law, Labour Law, or Labour Contract Law, all of which remained in force as of 2021.[16][non-primary source needed]

The Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China was first adopted in 1991 and subsequently amended in 2007, 2012, 2017 and 2021.[17][18][19][non-primary source needed]

Criminal law and Criminal Procedure Law

edit

Criminal law

edit

China's first post-1949 substantive and procedural Criminal Code was enacted in 1979.[20] The 1979 Code followed the release of a new Constitution in 1978, and the fall of the Gang of Four in 1976.[citation needed]

The Criminal Law of China (1997) defines numerous corruption-related offenses, the most common of which include: embezzlement, bribery, collective embezzlement, misappropriation, holding huge property with unidentified sources, misuse of authority, dereliction of duty, and fraud.[21]: 120 

In 2009, China amended its Criminal Law to set a low threshold for the prosecution of malicious cybercrimes and illegal data sales.[11]: 131 

The present Criminal Code, The Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和国刑法) is the product of extensive revisions, most recently passed on December 26, 2020 (the 11th Amendment to enact on March 1, 2021) which featured changes in response to recent social changes, some notable changes included the lowering of age that bears criminal responsibility to 16, and in the case of "committing crimes of intentional homicide, intentional harm", offenders of 14 to 16 of age would also bear criminal responsibility.[22]

The criminal conviction rate in China is over 99 percent.[23][24][25] The harshness of criminal law in China has attracted heavy criticism or strong support, especially due to the insistence on capital punishment for many crimes. China accounts for the biggest number of criminals executed in the world per year, which has raised concerns among different human rights groups and international organizations.[26]

Criminal Procedure Law

edit

This Criminal Procedure Law of China (中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法) provides for all phases of the criminal process. This is distinct from the system of administrative punishments (including detention for periods of multiple years) and procedures which are governed under a separate system of laws and regulations.[27] The criminal procedure law governs the conduct of investigations, including pre-trial detention, interrogation, surveillance, prosecution (by an institution called the "procuratorate") and the conduct of trials/the defense of the accused.[28] However, the independence of the courts and institutions involved in the investigation, prosecution and trial of criminal offences in China remains challenged by the structure of the PRC's government and its organs. One example of the structural barriers to the independence of courts is the CCP political-legal committee system, by which "the Party has the power to instruct, monitor or scrutinize courts regarding specific decisions of individual cases or categories of cases that attract attention from the Party."[29]

Administrative law and Administrative Procedure Law

edit

The State Council is authorized to promulgate administrative regulations, on social and economic sectors and affairs consistent with the laws adopted by the NPC and its Standing Committee. These laws include environmental protection law, regulations on taxation and customs, product quality law, and so on. In these areas, the central government and its organs are superior to other parties, such as enterprises and individuals, for they exercise the power of regulation. Since the early 2000s, environmental lawsuits have been available in China.[30]: 15  2014 amendments to China's Environmental Protection Law permit public interest environmental litigation, including with non-governmental organizations as proper plaintiffs.[31]: 227 

The Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China (1989) allows legal persons to bring legal challenges against administrative actions. The types of administrative actions that can be challenged must be "concrete actions", which include: administrative punishments (such as detentions and fines), administrative coercive measures, interference with the operations of enterprises, refusal to take action or perform an obligation, unlawful demands for performance of duties, and violations of rights of the person or property rights. The review of state action is carried out in the local people's court. Court review of agency action is not permitted for state action involving national defense or foreign affairs. Moreover, the court cannot review administrative legislation.

As a matter of fact, although administrative litigation involving governments is on the rise due to citizens using legal measures to protect their property from government violation, it is still quite difficult for the court to give fair judgements or efficient execution, as the court's judges are appointed by the CCP and finance comes from the government.

China's first comprehensive antitrust law was the Anti-Monopoly Law which was passed in 2007 and became effective in 2008.[11]: 89 

In 2015, the Administrative Procedure Law was revised.[32]: 136  The 2015 revisions expand the people's rights to sue the government.[32]: 136 

According to academic Keyu Jin, the revisions to the Administrative Procedure Law codified in 2021 mark a new milestone in improving the rule of law in China.[32]: 281 

Digital evidence

edit

Intellectual property claims involving the internet use a procedure whereby public notaries certify the existence of internet content at a given time.[12]: 124  As of at least 2023, blockchain technology is being increasingly used an alternative means of permanently recording a website's content at a specific time.[12]: 123–124  It was first accepted as an alternative to the sometimes impractical or cost-inefficient public notary procedure by the Hangzhou Internet Court.[12]: 125 

Judiciary

edit
This paragraph is an excerpt from Judicial system of China.[edit]
The judicial branch, organized under the constitution and organic law, is one of five organs of state power elected by the National People's Congress (NPC), in the People's Republic of China. China does not have judicial independence or judicial review as the courts do not have authority beyond what is granted to them by the NPC under a system of unified power. The Chinese Communist Party's Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission maintains effective control over the court system and its personnel.[33][34] Hong Kong and Macau have separate court systems in accordance with the "one country, two systems" doctrine.
 
The types of courts in China, and the paths of appeal.

Law enforcement

edit
This paragraph is an excerpt from Law enforcement in China.[edit]
Law enforcement in China consists of an extensive public security system and a variety of enforcement procedures used to maintain order in the country. Along with the courts and procuratorates, the country's judicial and public security agencies include the Ministry of Public Security (MPS) and the Ministry of State Security (MSS), with their descending hierarchy of departments, bureaus (局, "Jú"), subbureaus (副局, "Fù jú"), and stations (所, "Suǒ").
edit

The Ministry of Justice of PRC governs the prison and Laogai, and it mainly focuses on regulation of the legal profession. Historically the legal profession has been insignificant in the PRC. In the late 1970s, there were no more than a couple of hundred practicing lawyers. Since the 1980s, as China's leadership became cognizant of the importance of the legal system and legal profession to advance economic development, training for lawyers dramatically increased. From 1986 to 1992, the number of lawyers in the country more than doubled from 21,500 to 45,000, and by 2008 had reached 143,000.[35]

As of 2012 an oath pledging loyalty to the CCP is required of new and re-licensed Chinese lawyers:[36]

I swear to faithfully fulfill the sacred mission of legal workers in socialism with Chinese characteristics. I swear my loyalty to the motherland, to the people, to uphold the leadership of the Communist Party of China and the socialist system, and to protect the dignity of the Constitution and laws.[36][37]

Xi Jinping encourages legal professionals to selectively incorporate aspects of traditional Chinese law into their modern approaches.[38]: 36 

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Ahl, Björn (2019-05-06). "Judicialization in authoritarian regimes: The expansion of powers of the Chinese Supreme People's Court". International Journal of Constitutional Law. 17 (1): 252–277. doi:10.1093/icon/moz003. ISSN 1474-2640.
  2. ^ Wang, Chang (2013). Inside China's legal system. Madson, Nathan H. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing. pp. 56–7. ISBN 978-0857094612. OCLC 878805962.
  3. ^ a b c Zhang, Qianfan (2021-07-04). "The Communist Party Leadership and Rule of Law: A Tale of Two Reforms". Journal of Contemporary China. 30 (130): 578–595. doi:10.1080/10670564.2020.1852743. ISSN 1067-0564. S2CID 229394840.
  4. ^ Jamie P., Horsley (September 2019). "Party leadership and rule of law in the Xi Jinping era". Brookings Institution. Archived from the original on 2024-01-30. Retrieved 2024-01-31.
  5. ^ "Finding Chinese Law on the Internet - GlobaLex". Archived from the original on 2006-12-14. Retrieved 2006-12-19.
  6. ^ a b c d e f Fang, Qiang (2024). "Understanding the Rule of Law in Xi's China". In Fang, Qiang; Li, Xiaobing (eds.). China under Xi Jinping: A New Assessment. Leiden University Press. ISBN 9789087284411. JSTOR jj.15136086.
  7. ^ Fu, Hualing; Cullen, Richard (January 2008). "Weiquan (Rights Protection) Lawyering in an Authoritarian State: Building a Culture of Public-Interest Lawyering". The China Journal. 59: 111–127. doi:10.1086/tcj.59.20066382. ISSN 1324-9347. S2CID 142905383.
  8. ^ "Three Supremes". China Media Project. 2021-04-16. Archived from the original on 2024-09-13. Retrieved 2024-09-20.
  9. ^ "中国特色社会主义法律体系". 中华人民共和国. 2011-10-27. Archived from the original on 2023-06-02. Retrieved 2023-06-02.
  10. ^ "Xi makes the rules". The Economist. October 24, 2014. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 2024-09-22. Retrieved 2024-09-22.
  11. ^ a b c Zhang, Angela Huyue (2024). High Wire: How China Regulates Big Tech and Governs Its Economy. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780197682258.001.0001. ISBN 9780197682258.
  12. ^ a b c d e f Šimalčík, Matej (2023). "Rule by Law". In Kironska, Kristina; Turscanyi, Richard Q. (eds.). Contemporary China: a New Superpower?. Routledge. pp. 114–127. doi:10.4324/9781003350064-12. ISBN 978-1-03-239508-1.
  13. ^ Dotson, John (December 15, 2023). "CCP Ideological Indoctrination, Part 1: The PRC's New "Patriotic Education Law"". Jamestown Foundation. Archived from the original on 2023-12-18. Retrieved 2023-12-18.
  14. ^ Chen, Benjamin Minhao; Li, Zhiyu (2023). "Courts Without Separation of Powers: The Case of Judicial Suggestions in China". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4418249. ISSN 1556-5068. SSRN 4418249.
  15. ^ "中华人民共和国民法典". 中国人大网 (in Simplified Chinese). 2020-06-02. Archived from the original on 2021-05-16. Retrieved 2022-01-15.
  16. ^ "现行有效法律目录（277件）". 中国人大网 (in Simplified Chinese). 2021-04-29. Archived from the original on 2022-01-15. Retrieved 2022-01-15.
  17. ^ "中华人民共和国民事诉讼法". 中国人大网 (in Simplified Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-02-11. Retrieved 2022-01-15.
  18. ^ "全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于修改《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》和《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》的决定". 中国人大网 (in Simplified Chinese). 2017-06-27. Archived from the original on 2024-09-22. Retrieved 2022-01-15.
  19. ^ "全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于修改《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》的决定". 中国人大网 (in Simplified Chinese). 2021-12-24. Archived from the original on 2022-01-16. Retrieved 2022-01-15.
  20. ^ Cohen, Jerome Alan (1982). "Foreword: China's Criminal Codes". Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. 73 (1): 135–137. doi:10.2307/1143028. JSTOR 1143028. Archived from the original on 2024-07-29. Retrieved 2024-07-29.
  21. ^ Zhan, Jing Vivian (2022). China's Contained Resource Curse: How Minerals Shape State-Capital-Labor Relations. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-009-04898-9.
  22. ^ P.R.C. Criminal Law Amendment 11 at: https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/criminal-law-amendment-11/Archived 2021-02-10 at the Wayback Machine
  23. ^ "Prosecutions abandoned, conviction rate record high, and more on China's judiciary 2022". Safeguard Defenders. 2023-07-25. Archived from the original on 2024-05-16. Retrieved 2024-07-28.
  24. ^ Feng, Emily (June 25, 2024). "China convicts 99% of defendants in criminal trials. Reversing a conviction is hard". NPR. Archived from the original on June 26, 2024. Retrieved July 27, 2024.
  25. ^ "The nationalism of ideas". The Economist. July 25, 2024. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 2024-09-22. Retrieved 2024-07-28.
  26. ^ "Human rights in China". Amnesty International. Archived from the original on 2023-10-06. Retrieved 2023-12-18.
  27. ^ Biddulph, Sarah (2015). "Punishments in the Post Re-Education Through Labour World: Questions About Minor Crime in China". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2664864. hdl:11343/254294. ISSN 1556-5068. SSRN 2664864.
  28. ^ Chen, Jianfu (2013-05-02). Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law in the People's Republic of China: Commentary and Legislation. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ISBN 978-90-04-23445-1. Archived from the original on 2023-04-04. Retrieved 2023-03-24.
  29. ^ Li, Ling (2016-03-28). "The Chinese Communist Party and People's Courts: Judicial Dependence in China". American Journal of Comparative Law. 64 (1): 37–74. doi:10.5131/AJCL.2016.0002. JSTOR 26386882.
  30. ^ Esarey, Ashley; Haddad, Mary Alice; Lewis, Joanna I.; Harrell, Stevan, eds. (2020). Greening East Asia: The Rise of the Eco-Developmental State. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-74791-0. JSTOR j.ctv19rs1b2.
  31. ^ Dai, Jingyun; Spires, Anthony J. (2020). "Grassroots NGOs and Environmental Advocacy in China". In Esarey, Ashley; Haddad, Mary Alice; Lewis, Joanna I.; Harrell, Stevan (eds.). Greening East Asia: The Rise of the Eco-Developmental State. Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-74791-0. JSTOR j.ctv19rs1b2.
  32. ^ a b c Jin, Keyu (2023). The New China Playbook: Beyond Socialism and Capitalism. New York: Viking. ISBN 978-1-9848-7828-1.
  33. ^ Ahl, Björn (2019-05-06). "Judicialization in authoritarian regimes: The expansion of powers of the Chinese Supreme People's Court". International Journal of Constitutional Law. 17 (1): 252–277. doi:10.1093/icon/moz003. ISSN 1474-2640.
  34. ^ ""Walking on Thin Ice" - Control, Intimidation and Harassment of Lawyers in China". Human Rights Watch. April 28, 2008. Archived from the original on September 16, 2023. Retrieved June 19, 2024.
  35. ^ People's Daily Online. "China has more than 143,000 lawyers" Archived 2012-10-15 at the Wayback Machine, 16 April 2008.
  36. ^ a b Wong, Edward (2012-03-22). "Chinese Lawyers Chafe at New Oath to Communist Party". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2012-03-22. Retrieved 2024-04-20.
  37. ^ 司法部下发建立律师宣誓制度决定的通知 进入律师队伍必须进行宣誓 Archived 2012-12-08 at the Wayback Machine Ministry of Justice, P.R.C. accessed March 23, 2012
  38. ^ Shan, Patrick Fuliang (2024). "What Did the CCP Learn from the Past?". In Fang, Qiang; Li, Xiaobing (eds.). China under Xi Jinping: A New Assessment. Leiden University Press. ISBN 9789087284411.

Further reading

edit
Library resources about
Law of the People's Republic of China
English
Chinese
  • Chen Shouyi, Faxue jichu lilun 法学基础理论 (Theories on the Basis of Legal Science). Beijing: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe (Beijing University Press), 1984.
  • Shen Zongling (ed.), Fali xue 法理学 (Jurisprudence). Taipei: Wunan Book Publisher, 1994.ISBN 7-80083-759-9
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Law_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China&oldid=1250252370"