User contributions for 203.206.178.15

22 January 2009

• 08:1908:19, 22 January 2009 diff hist +8 Talk:Austrian school of economics →Mises predicted the Great Depression ?
• 08:1808:18, 22 January 2009 diff hist −2 Austrian school of economics →Contributions: ()s awkward. Deleted them.
• 08:1708:17, 22 January 2009 diff hist +832 Austrian school of economics See talk page. Hayek reference is unassailable. Mises ref (who also made the same prediction) has been deleted.
• 08:1208:12, 22 January 2009 diff hist +1 Talk:Credit crunch →Article not at all clear nor that thorough
• 08:1108:11, 22 January 2009 diff hist +791 Talk:Credit crunch →Article not at all clear nor that thorough
• 08:0508:05, 22 January 2009 diff hist −165 Credit crunch Inappropriate EL deleted. As per WP policy.

17 January 2009

• 08:2608:26, 17 January 2009 diff hist +10 Austrian school of economics Surely currently is appropriate and accurate. As stated before, economics is subject to fashion. Keynes today for example. "Currently" is appropriate here.
• 08:0908:09, 17 January 2009 diff hist +6 Austrian school of economics Who is to say what will happen tomorrow. "
• 08:0808:08, 17 January 2009 diff hist +49 Austrian school of economics Economics is uniquely vulnerable to "fashions". Truly NPOV would point out that it is CURRENTLY not part of the mainstream. That is not a permanent thing. Look at the revival of Keynes today...

16 January 2009

• 07:3107:31, 16 January 2009 diff hist −4 Talk:Austrian school of economics →Should Murray Rothbard be mentioned in the lede and elsewhere?
• 07:3007:30, 16 January 2009 diff hist +333 Talk:Austrian school of economics →Should Murray Rothbard be mentioned in the lede and elsewhere?
• 07:2607:26, 16 January 2009 diff hist +1 Austrian school of economics →Later reputation: Typo
• 07:2407:24, 16 January 2009 diff hist +296 Austrian school of economics Best not to confuse the issue by referencing the lede; best to put the extensive material in the body of the article. Got this sentence (and ref) from an earlier version. Looks OK to me.
• 07:2107:21, 16 January 2009 diff hist +93 Austrian school of economics No edit summary
• 07:2007:20, 16 January 2009 diff hist +1,157 Talk:Austrian school of economics →"the role of the state"

1 January 2009

• 06:5206:52, 1 January 2009 diff hist +154 Talk:Monetary reform →Missing mention of advocates, other popular approaches
• 06:5006:50, 1 January 2009 diff hist −23 Monetary reform There are no longer any "major" disputes, and all major statements are now verified with published sources (more than 99% of other WP articles). POV tag retired.
• 06:0706:07, 1 January 2009 diff hist −398 Talk:Criticism of fractional-reserve banking →LOL: Sorry, had to delete completely pointless comment.
• 05:5605:56, 1 January 2009 diff hist +168 Bank run →Theory
• 05:4905:49, 1 January 2009 diff hist +58 Systemic risk →Explanation
• 05:4805:48, 1 January 2009 diff hist +1 Talk:Credit crunch →Removed Text
• 05:3905:39, 1 January 2009 diff hist +234 Full-reserve banking No edit summary
• 05:3505:35, 1 January 2009 diff hist +551 Full-reserve banking No edit summary
• 05:2905:29, 1 January 2009 diff hist +17 Fractional-reserve banking →Exacerbation of the business cycle
• 05:2605:26, 1 January 2009 diff hist −18 Fractional-reserve banking Minor clarifications to first sentence. "Choice of" not really clear enough. It's only when they do it that it could be called FRB, so why keep the word "choice"?
• 05:2405:24, 1 January 2009 diff hist +1 Credit crunch No edit summary
• 05:2305:23, 1 January 2009 diff hist +217 Credit crunch I've re-inserted unpublished Ferri paper based on relevance but it's marginal and not as good as the World Bank paper.
• 05:2005:20, 1 January 2009 diff hist +154 Talk:Credit crunch No edit summary
• 05:1805:18, 1 January 2009 diff hist +15 Credit crunch Revert to last edit by NJGW
• 05:1705:17, 1 January 2009 diff hist +1 Talk:Credit crunch →Removed Text
• 05:1705:17, 1 January 2009 diff hist +219 Talk:Credit crunch →Removed Text