User contributions for SBrashear
A user with 13 edits. Account created on 18 January 2019.
19 January 2019
- 02:1102:11, 19 January 2019 diff hist +1,088 Talk:Vaginal steaming No edit summary
- 01:5101:51, 19 January 2019 diff hist +678 Talk:Vaginal steaming No edit summary
- 01:2201:22, 19 January 2019 diff hist −1 m Talk:Vaginal steaming No edit summary
- 01:2101:21, 19 January 2019 diff hist +676 Talk:Vaginal steaming No edit summary
- 00:3100:31, 19 January 2019 diff hist +941 Talk:Vaginal steaming →Update to make article less bias
- 00:0700:07, 19 January 2019 diff hist +4,246 Vaginal steaming The purpose of this edit is to make the article less bias and add historical context. The current version focuses on negative perceptions of vaginal steaming, and I have sought to ADD the perspective of proponents, without removing the criticism. Also, the current version cites many articles written on pop-culture websites by non-experts, so I have added citations to books and websites written by people who have devoted their careers to understanding the practice of vaginal steaming. Thank you! Tag: Visual edit
18 January 2019
- 23:2823:28, 18 January 2019 diff hist +1,131 Talk:Vaginal steaming No edit summary
- 22:0322:03, 18 January 2019 diff hist +23 User talk:Shoy →COIN discussion
- 22:0222:02, 18 January 2019 diff hist +709 User talk:Shoy Regarding the Vaginal Steaming article
- 22:0022:00, 18 January 2019 diff hist +393 User talk:SBrashear →January 2019
- 21:3721:37, 18 January 2019 diff hist +6,350 Vaginal steaming It appears that my version was automatically over-written by the previous editor, almost as if there was a bot watching the edits and submitting an auto-override. This does not seem appropriate or fair. Tag: Undo
- 20:3920:39, 18 January 2019 diff hist −18 m Vaginal steaming I realized some headings were BOLD so I unbolded them. Tag: Visual edit
- 20:3720:37, 18 January 2019 diff hist +6,368 Vaginal steaming I edited this page to ensure a balanced perspective on this practice, and provided a brief timeline of its rise to prevalence in the United States. Whereas the previous entry had a strong bias against the practice, this version ALSO shares the perspectives of its proponents. I maintained all of the previous content and citations, simply moved things to a more appropriate order and built upon what was there to make this article more robust. Tag: Visual edit