23.169.64.51

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

19:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Theroadislong (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

November 2021

Hello, I'm Equine-man. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, St. Louis–San Francisco 1522, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Equine-man (talk) 18:56, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Canadian Pacific 2317, you may be blocked from editing. Equine-man (talk) 19:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on St. Louis–San Francisco 1522. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2021

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Grand Canyon Railway 29, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. KNHaw ^(talk) 03:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:14, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reading 1187 has been accepted

Reading 1187, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reading 2100 has been accepted

Reading 2100, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 18:19, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pornographic film actor. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Western Maryland J-1 Class has been accepted

Western Maryland J-1 Class, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 13:13, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Fully sourced steam locomotive pages

Hey, do not the more citations needed template to steam locomotive pages such as Norfolk and Western 611, Southern Railway 1401, Union Pacific 4014, Atlantic Coast Line 1504, U.S. Sugar 148, etc., because some we're fully sourced. Trains13 (talk) 02:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

There are plenty of bad sources I have seen in all of those pages, and not even you are doing a thing about it! 23.169.64.51 (talk) 02:31, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

I'm not talking about the other locomotives such as 425, 475, and 90 pages, which all had very unreliable sources. I'm talking about you adding more citations needed template to the 611, 1401, 4014, 1504, and 148 pages, in which they don't need it, since their information were all cited with very good and reliable sources. Haven't you understood the words that I said to you? Trains13 (talk) 03:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

What does 475 got to do with this? And someone told me that all steam locomotive pages should have the unreliable banner. I don’t know. I still remove some banners, anyway, because I get confused, as I have only been editing Wiki for less than a year now.23.169.64.51 (talk) 02:31, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Next time, take a closer look at one of the steam locomotive pages and make sure it's fully sourced with very good and reliable sources.  Trains13 (talk) 14:42, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Savannah and Atlanta 750 has been accepted

Savannah and Atlanta 750, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gorden 2211 (talk) 10:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Savannah and Atlanta 750, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 20:40, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leviathan (locomotive) has been accepted

Leviathan (locomotive), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 09:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Canadian National 6400 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Canadian National 6400. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:30, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canadian National 6400 has been accepted

Canadian National 6400, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Milwaukee Road 261

The article Milwaukee Road 261 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Milwaukee Road 261 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 21:44, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mount Emily Lumber Co. 1 has been accepted

Mount Emily Lumber Co. 1, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Louis, Iron Mountain and Southern Railway 5 has been accepted

St. Louis, Iron Mountain and Southern Railway 5, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:45, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Hey, numbered user! Why did you even try to give those other pages GA nominees in the first place?! I don’t think anonymous users are allowed to do that! While I try to follow Wikipedia’s so-called guidelines in terms of sources (not that I read any kind of manual), no matter how hard I try, I will never turn them into the “ideal page”. The page on 1385 especially isn’t perfect, and neither are any of the ones you tried to build up. I once watched you admit you “wanted” to act just like a user who always goes by the book, and yet, you don’t even try, anyway! You try to “show” you’re improving, but you’re actually not! Also, don’t you recall me advising you to make a real account with a proper name, so that people will take you seriously? I’ve noticed you never even tried that. Someone who likes train writing (talk) 04:54, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Chill out girl. I was only copying User:Trainsfan1331, with the exception of specific sources that can limit one Wiki user of what to do and not to do. Tho, for some reason, I did originally think giving pages those GA nominations would've been a good idea. Another thing, I promised User:NorfolkandWesternBoi that I would use the sources he found in the pages I’m trying to mess with right now, albeit, I have stuff in real life that are constantly getting in the way. Idk if you noticed, but User talk:70.188.111.54 left a lot of draft articles behind, and he’s not even trying to make ‘em up. SO PLEASE STOP QUESTIONING WHAT IM DOING. I KNOW WHAT I’M DOING.

Did you just call me a girl?! You just struck a nerve, buddy boy... Also, you can't just tag other users into this. They don't need to be involved, and you cannot continuously manipulate them into cleaning up your mess. Someone who likes train writing (talk) 06:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Question about St. Louis, Iron Mountain and Southern Railway 5

Hi 23.169.64.51,

I suggest that you create an account because this makes it easier to address you - as an example, because you are using an IP account I can't be shure that the person who reads this is the same person who did this modification. Anyway, if that was you, I have a question: What is meant by "Columbian" type? Is this related to Columbian (B&O train) or Columbian (MILW train)? If so, we could link that. (I'm not in any way an railroad expert, I've just detected this article because I want to correct some typos).

Yours --Cyfal (talk) 13:57, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Yes, that was me. I added “Columbian” type, because according to the sources I found, 2-4-2 engines were referred to as “Columbia’s”. It isn’t in any way relevant to the B&O or MILW trains you mentioned. Also, I suppose I’ll make a “proper” account……

Thank you very much for your answer. I had looked at Columbia and didn't find anything railway related but these two trains... I see, it would be better that I had take a look at 2-4-2, the word right before "Columbian" in this article - there it is mentioned! I've added it now here at Columbian, in Columbia it was already present. Yours--Cyfal (talk) 18:22, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

V&T 21

Just In case you didn't see, I added sources in the Talk pages of the Drafts you and your friend are working on. The Drafts that I Provided sources for is in my User Page under Comming Soon. DomtheN&WFan (talk) 20:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

This anonymous user profile is no longer active. I already told you I changed my Wikipedia profile Larrysteamfan (talk) 21:47, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilmington and Western 98 has been accepted

Wilmington and Western 98, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:02, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

---