Doniago

DRN Case Status

Case		Created		Last volunteer edit		Last modified
Title	Status	User	Time	User	Time	User	Time
Genesis creation narrative	Resolved	Violoncello10104 (t)	6 days, 20 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	2 days, 23 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	2 days, 23 hours
Algeria	Closed	Lord Ruffy98 (t)	4 days, 23 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	21 hours	Robert McClenon (t)	21 hours
Yasuke	New	Tinynanorobots (t)	4 minutes	None	n/a	Tinynanorobots (t)	4 minutes

If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options.
Last updated by FireflyBot (talk) at 15:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

The Bourne Identity

Hi, I just wanted to say that I re-added the note on The Bourne Identity with proper citation. Apologies for the oversight. TheAlderaanian (talk) 13:40, July 9, 2024 (UTC)

No problem! You might want to look at the article text as well (I'm about to step away from my PC for a bit, but if you'd rather I take a look, reply here); I think it mentions the same info you added, but it's worded differently and potentially inconsistently to what you added. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doniago (talk • contribs) 13:51, July 9, 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
188		Gill-man (talk)	Add sources
962		Albinism (talk)	Add sources
62		Illinois State Redbirds football (talk)	Add sources
164		German Wikipedia (talk)	Add sources
93		Video 2000 (talk)	Add sources
390		The Hellbound Heart (talk)	Add sources
292		Vinny Appice (talk)	Cleanup
1,073		Daniel LaRusso (talk)	Cleanup
643		Search for extraterrestrial intelligence (talk)	Cleanup
500		Zootopia (franchise) (talk)	Expand
151		The Creature Walks Among Us (talk)	Expand
146		Penn Zero: Part-Time Hero (talk)	Expand
11,258		Flea (musician) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
513		TaleSpin (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
133		De-aging in motion pictures and television (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2		Local and/or General (radio program) (talk)	Merge
5		Maung Minbyu (talk)	Merge
9		Pennsylvania Lines LLC (talk)	Merge
28		Dissolution of the Lumumba Government (talk)	Wikify
42		Gargoyles (video game) (talk)	Wikify
9		Creature of Destruction (talk)	Wikify
24		Robert Zemeckis' unproduced projects (talk)	Orphan
4		The Refuge Collection (talk)	Orphan
3		Alta Architects (talk)	Orphan
101		Red Curtain Trilogy (talk)	Stub
115		Nafud desert (talk)	Stub
12		Pathogen (film) (talk)	Stub
9		East Bank High School (talk)	Stub
42		Alex Gansa (talk)	Stub
34		Malik Hassan Sayeed (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

once upon a time in america

Hi @Doniago:, many thanks for monitoring this article and checking the edits. I do disagree, however, that my edits added unnecessary details and so I would like them to be re-instated. My edits focus on a) adding aspects on the story between Noodles and Deborah (which is a key theme of the movie and had thus far not been adequately covered in the summary), b) correcting mistakes (e.g. Deborah is not "still an actress" but she has turned into one by then) and c) adding a description of the key scene with exchanging babies (if that one should go out, then why would the scene with the diamond raid stay? Also, the detail on him watching the assassination attempt on Bailey is not needed). Please let me know which of these additions are in your view not needed and too detailed and we can discuss. Thanks Jaeljojo (talk) 16:34, 23 August 2024 (UTC).

Thanks for reaching out to me with your concerns! WP:FILMPLOT has a pretty bright-line rule that plot summaries for film articles should not exceed 700 words. As such, I don't take issue with any of your specific edits, but rather the overall expansion. If you feel that guideline should be waived for the article for this film, I recommend that you initiate a discussion at the article's Talk page so that a consensus can be established. Happy editing! DonIago (talk) 16:40, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. The guideline says "should not exceed 700 words" and "unless the structure is unconventional", but in the article it already says that this movie with close to 4 hours qualifies for this. And infact the summary is already beyond 700 words. I will discuss on the talk page as you suggest but I find your broadbrush deletion on the basis of "many unnecessary additional details" strange editing. Jaeljojo (talk) 07:01, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry

But sill I will remake my posts that you delete. Hoppecadenmike (talk) 13:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

I have no idea what this is in reference to, sorry. DonIago (talk) 15:07, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

You remember me telling you to delete your account or I'm I with the same guy btw I got an up ban then it passed. Hoppecadenmike (talk) 15:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Welcome back, I suppose. DonIago (talk) 15:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Remember that sigma guy Hoppecadenmike (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

I'm him Hoppecadenmike (talk) 18:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Can't say I have any recollection of that, sorry! DonIago (talk) 18:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Ok... I have no page wanna see cool stuff about me I'm Caden I'm 8 I like phones I'm a HTC fan Hoppecadenmike (talk) 19:11, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

If you previously told me I should delete my account, then I don't think we're going to be friends, sorry. DonIago (talk) 19:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Not you I did it to Hoppecadenmike (talk) 19:13, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

To prevent any sense that you might have created a new account to avoid scrutiny or such, I recommend that you update your old user account with Template:Retired to indicate that you no longer intend to use it, as discussed at WP:SOCKLEGIT. DonIago (talk) 14:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

I can't remember my password Hoppecadenmike (talk) 17:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

You don't need to have access to the old account to add a note to the Talk page for it. :) DonIago (talk) 17:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

What talk? Hoppecadenmike (talk) 23:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Ahhh look at your usertalk Hoppecadenmike (talk) 23:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

User talk:Cadenhop. You should edit that to add a note indicating that that account is inactive, per the policy I linked above. DonIago (talk) 02:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Its not saying sigma is on it Hoppecadenmike (talk) 08:28, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Wanna be my friend but I'm 8 Hoppecadenmike (talk) 08:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

hey

I got banned from the wiki page | old:sigma Hoppecadenmike (talk) 23:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

If this is something you want me to look at, please provide a WP:BLUELINK. DonIago (talk) 02:51, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

I'm on a kids kindle so it's not gonna work for me can you please explain Hoppecadenmike (talk) 08:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ariana Grande discography and Talk:Deadpool & Wolverine on "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comments. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Total Recall (1990 movie)

As you requested I kept the word count low for my edit of the movie's synopsis since you requested it absolutely needs to be under 700 words total : the excerpt I modified was kept at 37 words , same as original, as I told you on my own talk page. Wiki member Darkwarriorblake now proceeded to revert, again, the edit, even though it is concise, and as short as before (37 words exactly). This attitude is being tiresome and non constructive. He claims condescendingly the edit is a "laborous effort" and "based on an imdb trivia article". Thing is I thought of this years ago when imdb didn't even exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E0A:208:4130:103D:1801:AA4B:2686 (talk) 22:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

If you're talking about the stuff with the red pill, then regardless of word count I think it's more detail than most readers of the article are going to care about. That said, you're welcome to raise the question at the article's Talk page so that editors interested in the article can weigh in and form a consensus. If it has significance outside the plot summary, then it would probably be better to discuss it outside the plot summary as well, with appropriate references. DonIago (talk) 22:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

The pill could be red, yellow, golden or even transparent, I don't care, I'm not into the whole red/blue pill thing the least, I find it ridiculous if you want my own opinion, just saying this to be clear. Now to get into the context, in the movie Total Recall(1990) Edgemar doesn't just "explain things" as implied by the amateurish excerpt in the wiki synopsis. Edgemar claims to be a doctor sent by Rekall, sure he proceeds to explain the basics in order to bring Quaid back to reason (he's supposedly still at Rekall on Earth, asleep in the device), but goes further : he hands him a pill ("inside your dream you'll fall asleep") that would make him awaken at Rekall's facility peacefully and would thus end the martian dream adventure. For all the spectator knows, it could very well be a poison, alternatively some sleeping pill, anything just to neutralize Quaid while the present moment is very true (this is what Quaid thinks due to the events following immediately after)...or Edgemar is right and the whole intervention by the latter with his magic pill is just a safety protocol from Rekall, activated in laste resort to avoid lobotomy. Notice it is just when Edgemar proposes said pill that Quaid holds him at gunpoint : in the sequence, Dr. Edgemar claims that Quaid eventually shooting him would only end by having the latter trapped in a permanent psychosis & being lobotomized in the real world, as no one would be able to lead him safely out of the dream (only the doctor can supposedly). Then, why is the pill necessary and why does Edgemar insist so much for Quaid to take it? If the pill isn't important then why is there a whole sequence where Quaid pretends to calm down and obey, placing the pill in his mouth? HE fakes to swallow, and this irritates strongly Edgemar who suddenly adopts a harsh tone ordering him again to swallow it, Lori plays "good cop" by asking Quaid very gently to comply, and it is after a long silence, observing Edgemar sweating profusely, that Quaid decides to shoot him in the head. Quaid clearly thinks Lori and the doctor are conspiring against him. He spits the pill on Edgemar's body afterwards. It is not known in the movie if everything is a dream or not (it differs from the original short story), so in the eventuality that it was all real, then the pill could have had ended the adventure but in a more catastrophic manner. By the way "Betty Logan" who had no user page ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Betty_Logan ) when vandalizing my edit then suddenly said member has a member page now... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Betty_Logan . Unfortunately you did not approve of my edit in the end despite your promise on my talk page to leave it alone as long as the rewording was concise with a low word count... It's becoming a chore to participate on wikipedia these days. You simply decided it "it's more detail than most readers of the article are going to care about". For your personal information, you should look again at the sequence, it's only 3mn long, and I dare say you do not "recall" it correctly...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBEVuzWHaOc you can have it taken down by youtube, I'm not the source, I saw the film when it was released unlike some would be know it alls who discovered it recently. 2A01:E0A:208:4130:103D:1801:AA4B:2686 (talk) 23:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

TL;DR. At least use paragraph breaks please. DonIago (talk) 23:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

How convenient, the talk page for my IP just disappeared https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:2A01:E0A:208:4130:103D:1801:AA4B:2686&action=edit&redlink=1 , of course now there is no proof you promised to keep the edit if it complied with your requests (which seemed reasonable : low word count, being concise). 2A01:E0A:208:4130:103D:1801:AA4B:2686 (talk) 00:15, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

I don't have the sole authority to decide what text stays in articles, so it seems highly unlikely to me that I would have ever made such a promise. DonIago (talk) 00:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

How come the talk page of my present IP disappeared? 2A01:E0A:208:4130:103D:1801:AA4B:2686 (talk) 00:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

I was misled, I thought you were a moderator/administrator of wikipedia. You user page states you're neither. What a waste of time. 2A01:E0A:208:4130:103D:1801:AA4B:2686 (talk) 01:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

I'm quite certain I never claimed to be either one. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 03:11, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
436		Paul Frees (talk)	Add sources
128		Hengyang (talk)	Add sources
23		Law and Oracle (talk)	Add sources
22		Brannigan, Begin Again (talk)	Add sources
328		Philip J. Fry (talk)	Add sources
116		Deep Space Nine (fictional space station) (talk)	Add sources
41		Joachim Boldt (talk)	Cleanup
13		The Butterjunk Effect (talk)	Cleanup
15		United States Office of Research Integrity (talk)	Cleanup
4		2009 in Monaco (talk)	Expand
108		Air Bud: Spikes Back (talk)	Expand
22		2-D Blacktop (talk)	Expand
324		Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea (TV series) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
3,620		That '70s Show (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,448		Billy Clanton (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
82		Scientific writing (talk)	Merge
5		Annona macroprophyllata (talk)	Merge
39		Regular local ring (talk)	Merge
62		History of African Americans in Los Angeles (talk)	Wikify
38		The Bots and the Bees (talk)	Wikify
15		The Six Million Dollar Mon (talk)	Wikify
2		Billys Lake (talk)	Orphan
2		Aniashu (talk)	Orphan
2		Adnan Bin Abdullah Al Mazrooa (talk)	Orphan
24		Good Morning Baltimore (talk)	Stub
11		I Can Hear the Bells (talk)	Stub
22		DSV Turtle (talk)	Stub
37		The Dogfather (talk)	Stub
24		Hooray for Diffendoofer Day! (talk)	Stub
16		Maharlika (film) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

RE: Blade Runner edit (September 2024)

Hey there! Apologies, I wasn't trying to infract Wikipedia's POV neutrality. The film Blade Runner is indeed a loose adaptation of the original novel by Philip K. Dick; while a lot of characters and multiple story beats are alike, the movie changes significant parts of the book and uses it as a basis rather than being an accurate adaptation to the big screen. I won't strongly defend my edit if you think it's still a violation considering your edit count is significantly higher than mine, but I wanted to clarify I had good reasoning and intentions behind the change; the film and the novel differ substantially in several areas, and it's not conjecture.

Cheers! DecryptedPixel (talk) 18:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi DP, thanks for reaching out! I never for a moment doubted that you meant well, so no worries there. :)

My concern is that the word "loose" is a matter of viewer interpretation. You might feel it's a loose adaptation, but another viewer might feel it's a pretty close adaptation. There isn't necessarily any objective measure of when an adaptation becomes a loose adaptation.

I hope that makes sense! If you do feel it would be better to specify that it's a loose interpretation, you're welcome to raise the question at the article's Talk page so that a consensus can be formed. Alternately, if you can find multiple sources that refer to it as such, I think you could include the term with those sources cited, to make it clear that it's not just your opinion but the opinion of respected film critics.

I hope this helps a bit. Happy editing! DonIago (talk) 18:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I get that, I wasn't trying to be subjective with the "loose adaptation" phrase; even other pages on Wikipedia refer to it as such (Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? § Film) or that several things from the novel are omitted (Cyberpunk § Film and television). But I don't fault you for being wary after all. As for finding sources, I'm not sure if they count as respectable critics, but nevertheless for posterity's sake here's a quick few I found: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6].

I'm not sure about the process for forming consensuses on talk pages, but I'll look into it if that's the next viable step. Cheers! DecryptedPixel (talk) 06:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

I think if you reinserted "loosely" and added those refs (that presumably use the word; I didn't go looking) but avoided any that appear to be blogs that you'd probably be okay; I don't see that there's any need to bring it up on the Talk page at that point unless someone else reverts you. Good research! DonIago (talk) 12:22, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Hmmmm you don't have to read them all but I could definitely use a second pair of eyes on which of the sources classify as "blogs". I think a couple of the links contain the exact word "loose" but the Den of Geeks article (which I assume is preferable for citation) doesn't; instead it describes many of the intentional changes between the two media, and I think that's a worthwhile tradeoff. DecryptedPixel (talk) 13:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

I would not use the ones from WordPress or any with "blog" in the URL. I think that leaves you with at least two, which should be fine. As I said, I can't guarantee that anyone won't challenge the addition subsequently, but we can cross that bridge if/when we come to it. DonIago (talk) 19:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)