Status: (Around)
My very best friend
Buddy's best friend
FlightTime Phone (talk · contribs · count)
FlightTime Public (talk · contribs · count)
{{ping|FlightTime}} with your message. Thank you 
 | If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please Click Here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. To keep discussions coherent, I will usually answer in the talk page where the first message was placed. If I left you a message on another talk page, please answer there: I will have it on my watch list. Thank you. |  |
Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 16:06, 7 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
Click here to leave a new message
If you're here, then my main talk page is protected. I do occasionally check this page, but to be sure I'm aware of your post please include {{ping|FlightTime}} with your message. Thank you FlightTime  It is 9:16 AM where this user lives in the Mojave Desert. ()
|
Welcome to my talk page.
Archives Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
 | This talk page is automatically archived by lowercase sigmabot III. Any threads with no replies in 14 days may be automatically moved. Threads with fewer than two timestamps (no replies) are not archived. |
Revert on Arnold Schwarzenegger
edit@FlightTime: Hello, you reverted an edit of mine @ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arnold_Schwarzenegger&oldid=prev&diff=1252573621
Would you please explain how this item: "Schwarzenegger saved a drowning man in 2004 while on vacation in Hawaii by swimming out and bringing him back to shore." belongs in this section: "Accidents and injuries". All the other examples relate directly to an accident or injury of Schwarzenegger himself.
My edit comment was "interesting fact, but clearly not an accident or an injury." Your revert comment was "Removal of sourced content without discussion" which did not relate at all to my edit comment. I am sure that either of us can come up with an enormous list of material that, even though properly sourced, does not belong in articles, etc.
If it said in Accidents and injuries that Schwarzenegger drives a Honda Civic, and that was properly sourced, you would object to it being removed? It definitely did not belong in that section, so I removed it. Would you please consider removing it again? Or I will be happy to discuss further.
Thank you • Bobsd • (talk) 22:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Bobsd: My edit summary says exactly why I reverted your edit. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @FlightTime: How about taking the time to reply to my questions? Are you saying that "saving a drowning man" properly belongs in a section about "Accidents and injuries" to Schwarzenegger? That any properly sourced sentence, about anything, could be placed in that section and an editor should not remove it because it is sourced, without a discussion on the talk page? • Bobsd • (talk) 02:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)