Trainsandotherthings

Archives (Index)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

VALE 3025

Just so you know, I’ve also expanded and improved the Valley Railroad 3025 page shortly after I completed NYS&W 142, if you’d like to give the former a look over, as well. I’m shocked no one else has even tried to expand that page since it was created back in 2008. Someone who likes train writing (talk) 03:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@Someone who likes train writing: I'll take a look this evening. Thanks for your contributions, you've made a big difference already in our coverage of locomotives. It's always nice to look in the edit history of an article and see a +15,000 byte addition. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

I really have tried to redeem myself in my Wikipedia editing skills for a while now. There are plenty of other pages that I would like to heavily improve, with the New York, Susquehanna and Western Railway page being next in line in my book. Someone who likes train writing (talk) 01:42, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Looking for ANI of LTA

There was an LTA editing as a few IPs out of Australia. Do you happen to have the original ANI filing that got that LTA site-banned? I'm trying to chase down if a NSW IP lines up with this LTA. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

@Pbritti: The infamous "Australian railroad IP" was banned at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1143#Australian railroad IP. Because the search tool sucks, I had to go back into my contributions in the Wikipedia namespace, find the date of the thread, and then try to find the archive from that date to dig up the thread. It will remain here on my talk page (and ultimately in my talk archives) if you ever need it again. Let me know if you're having further issues with this editor. I was hoping they'd give up the ghost by now but seems not. In my experience, 100% of the time they geolocated to either Sydney or Melbourne or their immediate suburbs. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:57, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Also, the EMD engine LTA that I see you've been hunting is back at it again today [1]. I'm confident they're unrelated to the Australian IP, very different MO. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:00, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Ah! Thank you finding that ANI; I similarly struggled using the search tool. I'll file it somewhere for my own use if they pop up again. Thanks for your opinion on that IP LTA, by the way, and I'll try to keep tabs on them, too. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:06, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

@Pbritti, also check out Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LB&SCR E2/Archive for some IPs which have been the Australian railroad IP. TarnishedPath^talk 02:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

@TarnishedPath: That's exactly what I needed! Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

@Pbritti, also in the first ANI discussion that @Trainsandotherthings linked to above there's a collapsed list of IPs and also a collapsed list of article created by the IP (I collated a bit of it along with others). I'm very willing to help with this editor. @Daniel has been an admin who has kept on top of them quite a bit, but there have been others who might be able to help out with providing information. TarnishedPath^talk 15:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Reading and Northern Class II Status

Regarding the recent addition of RBMN to the List of U.S. Class II railroads, the AAR defines the lower bounds of Class II as $40M in revenue or 350 miles of trackage (this is defined within that Wikipedia page as well). The source I attached says that the RBMN runs over 400 miles of trackage (confusingly, so does the AAR in their own document for Pennsylvania). I am not sure where to look up revenues of railroads, but being that the RBMN does indeed cover more than 350 miles would they not qualify as Class II? 192.234.195.153 (talk) 17:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) there isn't a great source on whether a railroad is or isn't a Class II. The AAR factsheets are the best we have at the moment, and they say that the Reading and Northern is a Class III. We can't really argue otherwise without engaging in original research, and in this case we'd be flatly contradicting a reliable source. Mackensen (talk) 17:49, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

I consulted with the most recent Pennsylvania state rail plan (2020), and it also lists the Reading, Blue Mountain and Northern as a Class III [2]. The railroad's own magazine does refer to itself as a Class II: [3]. They appear to be right on the line between Class II and Class III. I can't find any other sources supporting Class II status, so I generally agree with Mackensen above. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Wanamaker, Kempton and Southern 65

This is a new article created by our friend who we suspect to be the Australian railroad IP. I imagine you probably have some of the books listed in the references. Would you be able to tell me if any of them have WP:SIGCOV for the locomotive. Kind Regards, TarnishedPath^talk 02:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi @TarnishedPath: That's not a bad guess, I've got a decent number of Brian Solomon's books, but unfortunately I do not have the one cited in the article. I was able to view the pages on Google books, as I'm quite confident this editor doesn't have the books and just goes off of whatever they can find from Google. The coverage in the book amounts to 1 sentence on one page, and two sentences on another page (one of which is about H.K. Porter, Inc. in general rather than the specific locomotive, so really two sentences). In other words, not significant coverage. The other sources either say nothing at all about the locomotive or very little. The Reading Eagle source is one sentence, Railfan's Guide to Museums doesn't seem to mention the locomotive at all, and neither does Railroad History. I'd either pursue AfD or redirect to Wanamaker, Kempton and Southern Railroad.

From reading the article, there are tells in the writing style that match the IP's editing style. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:37, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

I'll go with a redirect. TarnishedPath^talk 14:58, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Adoption of a DYK nomnation

Do you have time to adopt Template:Did you know nominations/Cannonball (MILW train), and make improvements? I'd happily do the review and give you credit for the DYK. Flibirigit (talk) 23:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

I see someone has taken care of this before I was able to respond. I honestly don't think it's a great DYK candidate but hopefully you are able to make it work. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

• Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
• MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
• Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
• Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
• Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
• BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
• Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)