[go: nahoru, domu]
Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 16

< Wikipedia:Categories for discussion | Log
< March 15
March 17 >

March 16

edit

Category:Montreal Metro artists

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 24#Category:Montreal Metro artists

Category:Legendary creatures

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. I don't see clear consensus here for which way to organise these categories. There is not a clear relationship between folklore/lengend/myth. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge or reverse merge, the distinction between legendary and folklore is not clear enough to keep two separate categories. As a mere illustration of the problem, the legendary and folklore category are each other's child and parent category, in all three cases. I have tagged all six categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What about the Mythological characters/creatures/people categories? AHI-3000 (talk) 08:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - We've had several discussions over the years concerning "folklore/legend/myth". There are several issues. But the primary one is that myth can also be religion for some. (Creatures are less of an issue, but people/characters are very much an issue.) So we have to be careful to not mix folklore with myth. The next issue is that "legendary" sits right between folklore and myth. Usage is sometimes for myth and sometimes for folklore. And as we on Wikipedia only report, and not do WP:OR, we're kind of "stuck". Because books may call something "myths and legends" or other things "Legends and folklore", or sometimes a book will have all three and not differentiate which is which. The best solution for our usage, I think, would be to only use myth/mythology and folklore as nouns. For example, the standard in Category:Mythology is X in mythology. And I see similar in Category:Folklore. ("folklore people" is just bad form.) And only using Legend in its adjective form: Legendary, unless paired with one of the other two words. And yes, this will take some cleanup. I'd be happy to help work on it if there is consensus to clean this up. - jc37 02:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but fix the category tree – Legends and mythology are subsets of folklore. Mythology is folklore even if some people believe it as part of their religion (folklore doesn't necessarily imply something is untrue). Folklore is defined by the Cambridge Dictionary as "the traditional stories and culture of a group of people". It's a very broad subject that requires subcategorisation into different forms of folklore, including mythology and legends. The distinction between myth and legend isn't always clear, but there are cases that are clearly one or the other: a cyclops is mythological, a medieval Swedish king that may or may not have existed is legendary. And then there are obviously things in folklore that don't fall under myth or legend. Myth and legend categories should be subcategories of folklore categories, but the categorisation has been messed up. MClay1 (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think MClay1 has a good point here. AHI-3000 (talk) 22:07, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 22:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Former penal colonies

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and make Category:Penal colonies the parent. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 13:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No parent category. The article about Koro Toro in Chad includes a sourced statement describing it as a present-day penal colony. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support renaming AHI-3000 (talk) 09:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 22:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians in Kaduna

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 13:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To avoid confusion with the city of Kaduna. 123957a (talk) 02:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:02, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 22:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:16th-century men by nationality

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. No need to diffuse by nationality, when there's only one category in here Mason (talk) 18:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:14th-century Chinese male actors

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 24#Category:14th-century Chinese male actors

Category:Star Wars: The Bad Batch episodes

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. I am not sure what Gonnym meant by does so automatically, but this is such a small nomination that I will do it manually. EDIT: Apparently the recategorization is automatically done by {{Fiction-based redirects to list entries category handler}}! (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC); edited 20:43, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No episode articles so this category is empty. Gonnym (talk) 18:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lapinjärvi (municipality)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 April 5#Category:Lapinjärvi (municipality)

Category:Weird fiction video games

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not a thing whatsoever. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh hey Marcocapelle, sorry for the short nomination. Busy day! Weird fiction is a thing, but "weird fiction video games" are not an established concept. I went through the articles, only Control (video game) explicitly is stated as weird fiction, the only other mention of weird fiction is at The Vanishing of Ethan Carter, mentioning that the developer was inspired by it, the game itself is not called that. I was so bold in removing the incorrect categories. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 19:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Yugoslav political writers

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Only one category in here Mason (talk) 14:59, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Writers from the Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. I don't think further discussion is going to be conducive here. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's not enough writers in 20th-century Moldovan writers to justify this level of diffusion Mason (talk) 13:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Marcocapelle: The MASSR was entirely contiguous with modern Transnistria, and was therefore entirely outside the much larger Bessarabia, which is the core of Moldovan categories. Thanks to Stalin's Great Purge, the near-entirety of MASSR notabilities (writers, politicians etc.) managed to die before those 16 years ended, making their inclusion simply in Moldovan categories, rather than in a proxy subcategory, a tad anomalous. Let alone that they were also subjects of the Ukrainian SSR (unlike all other Moldovans), which is something neither you nor the nominator seem to have even contemplated. Dahn (talk) 23:38, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Confederacy only lasted for four years, so the entire Category:Confederate States of America tree is ripe for deletion, methinks. Biruitorul Talk 08:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose I have to ask: is the nominator aware of the special geographic and political status of the Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic? For instance, are they aware that the polity in question was a subdivision of the Ukraine, whereas the successor Moldovan republic was entirely outside Ukraine? That this is why the writers in question are also a relevant subdivision of Ukrainian and Transnistrian categories? That this distinction has cultural significance (for instance, the writers in question were supervised by a specialized body in Balta, later Tiraspol)? There are currently four articles in the category, which is plenty to warrant its existence; anyone with some modicum of interest in the topic will know that these are not all articles that would go into it -- existing articles have redlinks to Pavel Chioru, Nistor Cabac, Mihai Andriescu, Ion Canna, Leonid Madan, and Teodor Malai. I personally handled the existing articles (which is also why I feel my contributions are stalked by Smasongarrison, who nevertheless did not bother notifying me of this discussion); note how I wrote them from nothing to consistent articles, sourced to academic-level works and newspaper articles -- only so that now I am informed that I should keep on filling all possible redlinks until nominator, who spends much of their time simply on this rather wasteful activity, is perhaps convinced that the categorizing work has merits. Note how not even one objective criterion is being cited for this -- we're on X-Factor or The Apprentice, having to justify our work lest it is simply deleted. Dahn (talk) 23:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also allow me to underscore this: Smasongarrison makes it a central argument in their objection that "There's not enough writers in 20th-century Moldovan writers to justify this level of diffusion". However, this statement seems entirely unaware of the fact that whoever created the 20th-century subcategory never bothered diffusing writers out of the supra-Category:Moldovan writers, most of whom are 20th-century writers (this also includes the subcats, adding up to hundreds of articles). This is an additional reason why editors should not start noms until and unless they have had a thorough look at the immediate category tree(s). Ahem. Dahn (talk) 09:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose the MASSR was a Soviet creation aimed at influencing Romanian Bessarabia and the first playground of Moldovenism through these writers among others. The MASSR was also the first predecessor of modern Transnistria. These are two different perspectives from which this category can be useful. Dahn has created articles for five such writers which contain redlinks to other five. Ten articles is already a nice number for a category. But as Moldovans/Romanians were only less than a third of the population, I imagine there must be other Ukrainian or Russian (maybe even Jewish) writers from the ASSR with potential for an article. Super Ψ Dro 13:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Super Dromaeosaurus: Indeed, though note that the category is already multiethnic (including one Jewish writer -- though even he was made to play the part of a Moldavian, for ideological purposes). But yes, presumably there were a few writers among the Moldavian refugees of various backgrounds who made their way into Romania. Dahn (talk) 14:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, obviously, for the many reasons enumerated above. We are dealing with a distinct polity with a distinct literary culture. — Biruitorul Talk 16:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Martiniquais photographers

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one person in here, which isn't helpful for navigation. Mason (talk) 13:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Saint Anthony the Great abbeys

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 24#Category:Saint Anthony the Great abbeys

Category:Fictional prisoners and detainees

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Such a high level of specificity is not required for the fictional category. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What about Category:Prisoners and detainees (and all other similarly named subcategories within it)? Should they all follow a similar naming pattern in the style of Category:Prisoners? AHI-3000 (talk) 01:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After I have spent some time thinking about it, yes. A detainee is a prisoner, no doubt about it. I don't see what the major difference is here. Perhaps they are temporarily being held, but are imprisoned nonetheless. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:03, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:58, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 13:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I think this renaming proposal makes sense, I think we should start by renaming Category:Prisoners and detainees and all of its similarly named subcategories first. AHI-3000 (talk) 20:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional prison escapees

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: purge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There's too much overlap between fugitives and prison escapees. While prison escapees was the older category, I'm not sure it matters where they escaped from, just that they're a fugitive. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merger. There's a significant distinction between a suspected criminal fleeing to avoid prosecution and imprisonment, and a convicted prisoner escaping from incarceration. I think a better idea would be to keep both categories, while selectively purging articles from them; any character who escaped from jail should stay in Category:Fictional prison escapees, but remove them from Category:Fictional fugitives to avoid too much redundant overlap. AHI-3000 (talk) 02:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose merger. I agree with AHI-3000 that purging categories so they aren't redundant (basically, treat it as a diffusing category rather than a non-diffusing category?) is the better next step, rather than wholesale merging. Prison escapee is a prolific enough character trope, and sufficiently different from being a fugitive in general. Edmond Dantès's escape from the Château d'If involves a much different story than Zuko being on the run from the Fire Nation. P-Makoto (she/her) (talk) 01:40, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:58, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Purge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 12:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with keeping but purge per AHI-3000. The prison escapees category is rightly a subcategory of Category:Fictional fugitives, so prison escapees should be diffused properly. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People by former city

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I think we should broaden this category to be populated place, in the same spirit as other recent CFDs Mason (talk) 12:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Swiss evangelicals

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 24#Category:Swiss evangelicals

Category:French Baroque viol players

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 24#Category:French Baroque viol players

Category:Polish painters of Jewish descent

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 24#Category:Polish painters of Jewish descent

Category:Massacres of men

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 24#Category:Massacres of men

Category:Discrimination against men

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, redundant category layer with only one subcategory and one article. Merging to Category:Discrimination is not needed, both entries are already in that tree. The article is also in both other parents, while I doubt that the subcategory would belong there. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom Mason (talk) 12:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom —Panamitsu (talk) 11:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Azulejos

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename/merge as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:28, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename/merge per actual content, all articles in these categories are about buildings and structures. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:15, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Mason (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

By period

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename and re-parent, follow-up on this earlier discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:47, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom Mason (talk) 12:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Y. S. Rajasekhara Reddy

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:23, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unhelpful for navigation. There are only three pages total in this entire tree. Created by a disruptive, now banned editor. Mason (talk) 05:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:20th-century Greek American writers

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 16:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining four-way (4) intersection of century + nationality + occupation + ethnic/national descent Mason (talk) 03:13, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:English queer actresses

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 20:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's no need to have a single page in a category. I strongly urge the page creator to populate categories they create. Mason (talk) 01:17, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Boxing matches in Las Vegas

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 24#Category:Boxing matches in Las Vegas

Category:House of Vitré

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There is a list and a single baron in here, which is not helpful for navigation Mason (talk) 01:13, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Pigasse family

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This family category is an uncle-nephew pair, which doesn't need a category for navigation Mason (talk) 01:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fézensac family

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete category. There's no actual people in this category and the only page is the county they share a name with. The child category is already categorized. Mason (talk) 01:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:18th-century Danish newspaper publishers (people)

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one person in each of these categories, which isn't helpful for navigation. Mason (talk) 00:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_March_16&oldid=1217308060"