[go: nahoru, domu]
Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 April 23

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion‎ | Log

April 23

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 23, 2018.

Far-wing terrorism in the United Kingdom

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Nthep (talk) 19:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Redirect was created following a request at Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Redirects/2018-04#Redirect_request:_Far-wing_terrorism_in_the_United_Kingdom, but the request itself was IMHO obviously a typo for Far-right terrorism in the United Kingdom. I raised this with the editor who created it, but AFAICS they have not taken action to delete the mistaken page. – Fayenatic London 22:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As creator of the redirect, I do endorse that "Far-wing" was most likely an error. Since the alternative redirect was created, this one can be deleted. Paquito590 (talk) 19:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Untitled Deadpool Sequel

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 21:16, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Useless redirects as all of these film and TV show projects have titles now 74.89.40.77 (talk) 22:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, mushroom, mushroom

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 2#Badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, badger, mushroom, mushroom

10^0

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I mean, it's technically accurate, but since anything at all to the power of 0 equals 1, I'm not sure why this one specific redirect is necessary. Also, no views at all in the last 30 days. Thegreatluigi (talk) 20:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*Withdrawn by nominator. I still think this redirect is useless and should be deleted, but I can see I'm clearly in the minority, so I'll (somewhat grudgingly) withdraw this... Thegreatluigi (talk) 18:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Alps (subject portal)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 21:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created cross namespace redirect - maybe an example of thousands proposed like it? This is a very unlikely reach string. It is a very unlikely and inappropriate base for a text link. We don't need to clutter up mainspace search with such redirects. Legacypac (talk) 17:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

In event of moon disaster

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 1#In event of moon disaster

AH368

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete without prejudice against recreation if sourcing can be found. -- Tavix (talk) 21:17, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same rationale as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AH374 (2nd nomination) (no sources, no proof this actually exists). Jc86035 (talk) 16:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Portal:Random

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete per WP:SNOW and WP:G2. -- Tavix (talk) 14:43, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In Feb 2018 a user created this and redirected it at his own userpage. It shows up in all the Portal space navigation. Clearly no one is watching portal space very closely for this to get by. There is nothing Random about landing on this user's page from a portal page. Legacypac (talk) 14:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Really

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 2#Template:Really

Gunjeongcheong

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 12:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't able to verify a translation for this - Google translate only says "Oh, that gun amount cheong" and I can't find any other sources that use it ... Seraphim System (talk) 11:50, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Gunjeongcheong" (or "Kunjŏngch’ŏng" in MCR) is South Korean romanization name of "군정청" (Military Government). Thanks. --Garam (talk) 14:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Otello Corporation

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Close in favor of CfD. There are a lot of pages to go through here, but not much discussion anywhere. For this page's part, I don't think there's enough participation by uninvolved editors to consider this consensus, but I don't want to relist this because, as AngusWOOF points out, this isn't really the proper venue. Talkpage of the page in question would be best, but more to the point, a CfD discussion was opened a day prior to this nomination. There isn't exactly much input there either, but given it was made first and that this stems from a previous CfD, I'm closing this in favor of CfD as the (more) proper venue. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to create an article for this redirect but there seem to be previous (somewhat) inconclusive discussions regarding the redirect (User talk:Fayenatic london#CFD results: Opera Software). Discussions on individual talkpages went unanswered (User talk:Onel5969#Otello Corporation, User talk:Gotitbro#Rollback at Otello Corporation, User talk:Winged Blades of Godric#Otello Corporation), listing for discussion here formally. Both corporations (Opera Software and Otello Corp.) are distinct entities and cannot be encompassed in one article as that leads to WP:COAT as I had detailed in my edits (1). Requesting for removal of redirect and article creation for Otello. Gotitbro (talk) 05:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ministers of the Ghanaian Government

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Will tag with the relevant rcats. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:19, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SURPRISE. I followed the link expecting to be taken to a page giving information about the offices of the Ghanaian executive branch, and about how they are appointed etc., but I was instead taken to a page listing everyone who was appointed by the incumbent President. Delete.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  04:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Final Fantasy/Final Fantasy Tactics

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. {{R from subpage}} ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect, not properly formatted, should be deleted as unnecessary. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 03:18, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What kind of a search would this redirect be "clutter" for? -- Tavix (talk) 18:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On wikipedia search box. Legacypac (talk) 18:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No, specifically. Typing "Final Fantasy" gives the games and not this redirect, for example. -- Tavix (talk) 18:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Patrick Star Adventures

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 21:12, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion: This redirect was originally created as a hoax article for a nonexistent, fanmade SpongeBob spinoff series. It was redirected to the series page, but there is no reason for this redirect to exist since its topic is fake. SBSPfan (talk) 23:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_April_23&oldid=1142901226"