[go: nahoru, domu]
Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion‎ | Log

February 21

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 21, 2024.

Runaway (Damn Yankees song

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per CSD#G6. It's clear from the creator's contributions at the time that this was created in error. Thryduulf (talk) 22:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page once consisted of two sentences of a song description that didn't last a day before getting WP:BLAR'd into the general page for the album. The now-blocked creator had made this along with replica pages at multiple titles, including Runaway (Damn Yankees song), which is where the substantive editing took place. The history for the redirect in question, on the other hand, consists of the paste-in, the CSD notice a couple hours later, the blank-out, and a bot updating the target once the other replica was BLAR'd. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:48, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

4th Battalion, Queen's Royal Regiment (West Surrey

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G6 and WP:CSD#G7. Thryduulf (talk) 22:51, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect was created and blanked in 2 edits, with what appears to be an exact copy of its target. The creator published 55k bytes at the wrong title, before converting it into a redirect once realizing the mistake. It doesn't seem like there's any other history worth keeping here, and this is otherwise an implausible search term for the subject. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - created in error, with no authority to delete. Go ahead and get rid of it Rickfive (talk) 22:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2014 Ukraine crisis

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to 2014 in Ukraine. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 04:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to 2014 in UkraineDelete both. Given that these two similar terms now refer to distinct targets, it is evident that ambiguity exists. Consequently, readers would benefit more from search results. Another approach to resolving this ambiguity would involve disambiguation. Yorkporter (talk) 21:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ukraine crisis goes to Russo-Ukrainian War so probably best to send them there—blindlynx 22:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bowser (character and etc.

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. It's snowing! ✗plicit 14:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another bundle of pages missing ending parentheses. If in this group, these redirects either have associated titles in existence or are unable to be fixed in this way. On Wikipedia, these terms are implausible with the missing parenthesis. The views for these pages are generally zero across the board without external activity, yet all-the-while interfere with natural searches, and will not be sought normally on Wikipedia. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

1 Ceres in fiction

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 1#1 Ceres in fiction

Glazed ham

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 4#Glazed ham

2020 San Jose shooting

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of this at the article, and the section it points to is nonexistent. There is an article for 2021 San Jose shooting, but it seems like that would be an unlikely target. I suggest deletion. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:15, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Oven Toast Grill

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

A Phillip's appliance that is not mentioned at the target article. A previous RfD closed as no consensus, with the keep rationale being "the appliance exists and people use it". Yet, this topic still has not been mentioned at the target in the last 4 years since its closure. An otherwise confusing redirect to talk about "ovens, toasts, and grills" but have it all end up at "oven". Utopes (talk / cont) 19:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, and/or write an article about the Phillip's appliance already. Even without the existence of said appliance, WP:XY applies-- who's to say they didn't want an article about a grill? Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 20:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep because redirects are cheap, and because it's probably pointed to right page. The generic name is "oven toaster grill" or "oven toaster griller". They are popular in India. You can think of an OTG as either being a small, electric, countertop oven or as a large, fancy toaster oven. (If you're American, then the interior of a typical toaster oven might have 20–30 liters capacity, and a standard oven might have 100 liters. If you're in the UK, a standard single oven has about 60 litres interior capacity. A medium-size OTG is around 40 liters.) In other words, whether we should point it at Oven or at Toaster oven probably depends on what you think "normal" is in your personal experience, and looking at it objectively, either is reasonable. I lean towards leaving it where it is partly because Toaster oven is already a redirect to a section in Toaster, and an OTG is more than "just" a toaster. If you want to know more, then you might find these accessible explanations useful: https://www.biggerbolderbaking.com/toaster-oven-otg-baking-guide/ and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6HotmjOvrk WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:58, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Toaster Oven being redirected to Toaster isn't a problem, because Toaster actually has a section on Toaster Ovens. Oven, meanwhile, does not have a section on OTGs. Deletion as per WP:REDLINK is probably still the way to go, here, as per Alach E.-- that, or someone needs to head to Oven and write a section on the appliance in question. After all, someone looking up "Oven Toast Grill" might want to know that they are small, electric countertop ovens with a capacity of around 40 liters. Lunamann 🌙🌙🌙 The Moooooooniest (talk) 15:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No mention at the target. A reader interested specifically in this will be disappointed to be confronted with an article generally about ovens. This redirect creates a bad user experience, and redirects being cheap doesn't help that.—Alalch E. 00:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:12, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unless there is a mention at the target. No mention of OTG either at the target or anywhere at enwiki. The OTG dab also has no mention of this device. It was removed from the dab in 2022 for the same reason - no mention. Jay 💬 10:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

DAB page

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 2#DAB page

65th Infantry Regiment (United States and etc.

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All pages in this group have received 0-1 recent pageviews according to massviews [1]. In this group, there is a complete parentheses version in existence, or not fixable in this way. On Wikipedia, these terms are implausible with the missing parenthesis, and the existence of external links (unused via pageviews), do not justify the presence of noise titles in the search bar. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

IGet

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional/commercial, specific to a single product, speedy deletion criterion G11 possibly applies. Shearonink (talk) 02:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, bundling similar nominations, with all having the same rationale with a few variations. The only other comment for the general "IGet" redirect was "an apparent brand/company name for a cigarette/vaping device". Utopes (talk / cont) 08:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_21&oldid=1211743794"