[go: nahoru, domu]

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 10

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 10, 2023.

Wikipedia:Wrong

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 18#Wikipedia:Wrong

Aprili

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrowtalk 16:11, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. There is no mention in the article of the word "Aprili". Engr. Smitty Werben 18:42, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Universal Sprout

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 19#Universal Sprout

Kasket cap

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 18:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear connection with target. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 18:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep A black version of this cap, with a narrow crown and a band embroidered with foliage, was known as a kasket or Hamburg cap The reason for the redirect is in the article itself. Suggest checking in the future. SilverserenC 18:53, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, sorry! I skimmed the lead and then searched for "kasket cap", which wouldn't have picked it up, and the Google results were inconclusive. Will withdraw. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 18:57, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2-cycle

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 19#2-cycle

Northern irish language

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Languages of Northern Ireland. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 00:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even if this page does not need to be moved to Northern Irish language, redirect to Languages of Northern Ireland, due to being the most plausible. 176.33.246.14 (talk) 14:37, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While there is clearly consensus here to retarget, the {{rfd}} template was not added to the page; thus attracting no attention beyond RfD regulars. I have added the template and am relisting the discussion to give other users and editors time to respond.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 18:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Shawarma poutine

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 19:49, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect from a related topic [6] with no mention at target; unhelpful to the reader. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 18:04, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ticket to bollywood

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Ticket to Bollywood. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:29, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Ticket to Bollywood. Not mentioned at target. –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 17:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

STiki

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cross namespace redirect from main to projectspace for a now defunct antivandalism tool. Unlikely to be of much use to general readers of WP. #prodraxis connect 14:59, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ticket to Bollywood - The Film

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Former title of Ticket to Bollywood (film) which was deleted at an RfD last month. Same arguments apply, and to paraphrase the earlier RfD: Film title to director redirects for a title not named in the target article. These were created in 2014 as articles, then got redirected to the director in 2019 as there was still no reliably sourced evidence that this film had ever actually been released or even gone into production at all, and as of 2023 that evidence is still lacking.

There's simply no point in hanging onto redirects for a film that's so dead that even the director's article doesn't deign to mention it at all anymore. If it ever does get completed and released, then we can start a new article when that happens. Jay 💬 13:10, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bang(Harper's Island episode)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 11:55, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect title without a space between the title and disambiguation. Delete per WP:RDAB. Valid redirect at Bang (Harper's Island episode) so nothing is lost. Gonnym (talk) 11:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

PetScan

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The late question regarding the hatnote at the target may have to be taken to the target talk page, or handled boldly. Jay 💬 12:00, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No one looking for Positron emission tomography is likely to search for this odd miscapitalized title. IMO Wikipedia:PetScan is sufficiently geeky that anyone who can use it usefully doesn't need a pointer from mainspace to find it, so suggest deletion. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

David Larson (midstakes poker player)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 11#David Larson (midstakes poker player)

Matthew Heappey

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Bath (UK Parliament constituency)#Elections in the 2020s. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 04:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Heappey and James Heappey are brothers, but there is virtually nothing on James Heappey's page about his brother, nor would I expect there to be. I don't think it's expected to redirect sibling in this way? John Womble (talk) 11:21, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 15:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 23:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 04:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:Inappropriate pages

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Content removal#Inappropriate content for Wikipedia. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 04:30, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pages can be inappropriate for many reasons other than being vandalism/hoaxes. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:ImplausibleTypos

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 17#Wikipedia:ImplausibleTypos

Myth of the American Golden Age

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 01:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Primarily, WP:RDELETE #8. This is an odd redirect extant since 2008 - the targeted article, Baby Boomers, has a few passing references to a golden age, but no references to a "myth" of a golden age. There are other more plausible redirect targets, such as this or this, but none of them are particularly suitable. It gets about 10 hits/month, and has no incoming links in article space. —Ganesha811 (talk) 00:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).