Editing Ōkami
There are suggestions on this article's talk page for references that may be useful when improving this article in the future. (See the box that begins "The following ...".) |
Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable through citations to reliable sources.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 170: | Line 170: | ||
''Ōkami'' received critical acclaim, with a score of 93/100 on [[Metacritic]].<ref name="MCPS2" /> |
''Ōkami'' received critical acclaim, with a score of 93/100 on [[Metacritic]].<ref name="MCPS2" /> |
||
GameSpot gave it a 9 out of 10 and selected it as an Editor's Choice, citing that its "visual design instantly stands out, but it turns out to be just one of many inspired aspects of this impressive action adventure game".<ref name="gamespot-review">{{cite web | url = http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/okami-review/1900-6157846/ | title = Ōkami Review | work = Gamespot | last = Kasavin | first = Greg | date = 16 July 2006 | access-date = 9 August 2007 | archive-date = 6 July 2014 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140706203610/http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/okami-review/1900-6157846/ | url-status = live }}</ref> ''IGN'' gave the game a 9.1 out of 10, as being "beautiful, charismatic, engaging and one of the most original games you'll play anytime soon".<ref name="ign-review"/> Electronic Gaming Monthly's three reviewers gave it a 9, 9.5, and 9 out of 10, with one saying: "I'll be surprised if you can find a better game on any system this fall".<ref>{{cite web | author=MacDonald, Mark | year=2006 | title=Reviews: Okami – Refusing to paint by numbers | url=http://www.1up.com/reviews/okami_3 | work=1up.com | access-date=9 August 2007 |url-status = dead| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605011454/http://www.1up.com/reviews/okami_3 | archive-date=5 June 2011 | df=dmy-all }}</ref> ''[[Newtype USA]]'' named ''Ōkami'' its ''Game of the Month'' for October 2006, heralded the pacing as "nearly flawless" and proclaimed "''Ōkami'' is that rarest of beasts: a game without any obvious flaws. Clover's creativity and attention to detail are on full display here. Shame on any gamer who passes up this divine adventure".<ref>{{cite web | first=Benjamin| last=Turner| date=1 October 2006| title=Newtype USA / Reviews / Ōkami| work=Newtype-USA.com| url=http://www.newtype-usa.com/reviews/index.php?itemid=341| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070224185445/http://www.newtype-usa.com/reviews/index.php?itemid=341| archive-date=24 February 2007 | access-date=12 February 2007}}</ref> Eurogamer scored the game 10/10 saying: "Right from the start it conjures an atmosphere of being something special, but to keep that level of quality up consistently over 60 hours ensures that this will be a game that will be talked about for years to come".<ref name="EuroGPS2"/> In 2007, ''Ōkami'' was named eighteenth best PlayStation 2 game of all time in |
GameSpot gave it a 9 out of 10 and selected it as an Editor's Choice, citing that its "visual design instantly stands out, but it turns out to be just one of many inspired aspects of this impressive action adventure game".<ref name="gamespot-review">{{cite web | url = http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/okami-review/1900-6157846/ | title = Ōkami Review | work = Gamespot | last = Kasavin | first = Greg | date = 16 July 2006 | access-date = 9 August 2007 | archive-date = 6 July 2014 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140706203610/http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/okami-review/1900-6157846/ | url-status = live }}</ref> ''IGN'' gave the game a 9.1 out of 10, as being "beautiful, charismatic, engaging and one of the most original games you'll play anytime soon".<ref name="ign-review"/> Electronic Gaming Monthly's three reviewers gave it a 9, 9.5, and 9 out of 10, with one saying: "I'll be surprised if you can find a better game on any system this fall".<ref>{{cite web | author=MacDonald, Mark | year=2006 | title=Reviews: Okami – Refusing to paint by numbers | url=http://www.1up.com/reviews/okami_3 | work=1up.com | access-date=9 August 2007 |url-status = dead| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110605011454/http://www.1up.com/reviews/okami_3 | archive-date=5 June 2011 | df=dmy-all }}</ref> ''[[Newtype USA]]'' named ''Ōkami'' its ''Game of the Month'' for October 2006, heralded the pacing as "nearly flawless" and proclaimed "''Ōkami'' is that rarest of beasts: a game without any obvious flaws. Clover's creativity and attention to detail are on full display here. Shame on any gamer who passes up this divine adventure".<ref>{{cite web | first=Benjamin| last=Turner| date=1 October 2006| title=Newtype USA / Reviews / Ōkami| work=Newtype-USA.com| url=http://www.newtype-usa.com/reviews/index.php?itemid=341| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070224185445/http://www.newtype-usa.com/reviews/index.php?itemid=341| archive-date=24 February 2007 | access-date=12 February 2007}}</ref> Eurogamer scored the game 10/10 saying: "Right from the start it conjures an atmosphere of being something special, but to keep that level of quality up consistently over 60 hours ensures that this will be a game that will be talked about for years to come".<ref name="EuroGPS2"/> In 2007, ''Ōkami'' was named eighteenth best PlayStation 2 game of all time in IGN's feature reflecting on the PlayStation 2's long lifespan.<ref name="18th">{{cite web | author=IGN PlayStation Team | date=16 March 2007 | url=http://ps2.ign.com/articles/772/772296p2.html | title=The Top 25 PS2 Games of All Time | work=IGN PS2 | publisher=IGN Entertainment | access-date=18 March 2007 | archive-date=29 August 2011 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110829052827/http://ps2.ign.com/articles/772/772296p2.html | url-status=live }}</ref> ''[[Famitsu]]'' gave the game a near perfect score of 39 out of 40, the 15th game to date to receive this score from the publication.<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=10938 | title = Critical Reception: Capcom's/Clover Studio's Okami | first = Danny | last = Cowan | date = 20 September 2006 | access-date = 25 January 2012 | website = [[Gamasutra]] | archive-date = 22 October 2013 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131022120338/http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=10938 | url-status = live }}</ref> |
||
Conversely, the game was noted to have some flaws. The game was criticized for its uneven difficulty.<ref name="ign-review"/><ref name="gamespot-review"/> Reviewers have noted some difficulty in getting the game to recognize the correct Celestial Brush patterns,<ref name="1UPPS2"/> as well as excessive amounts of dialog, particularly at the introduction, which was hampered by the use of computer-generated voices instead of voice acting.<ref name="gamespot-review"/> |
Conversely, the game was noted to have some flaws. The game was criticized for its uneven difficulty.<ref name="ign-review"/><ref name="gamespot-review"/> Reviewers have noted some difficulty in getting the game to recognize the correct Celestial Brush patterns,<ref name="1UPPS2"/> as well as excessive amounts of dialog, particularly at the introduction, which was hampered by the use of computer-generated voices instead of voice acting.<ref name="gamespot-review"/> |