Content deleted Content added
Sarahj2107 (talk | contribs) cleaned up external links |
Angela WWW (talk | contribs) Added publication bias section with citation |
||
Line 51:
Watt said, "A large percentage of the public believes that certain eye movements are a sign of lying, and this idea is even taught in organisational training courses. Our research provides no support for the idea and so suggests that it is time to abandon this approach to detecting deceit."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.medicaldaily.com/eye-movements-wont-tell-if-you-are-lying-241293|title=Eye Movements Won't Tell if You Are Lying|last=Moore|first=Amber|date=July 12, 2012|work=Medical Daily|access-date=January 13, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190113181847/https://www.medicaldaily.com/eye-movements-wont-tell-if-you-are-lying-241293|archive-date=January 13, 2019}}</ref>
==Publication bias==
The field of Parapsychology has been known for issues with study replication. Pre-registration of all studies seems to result in less publication bias. In 2012, she and Jim Kennedy founded a study register for their field and in 2019, she produced a scientific paper reporting on the success of such a technique.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Grossman |first1=Wendy |author1-link=Wendy M. Grossman |title=Searching For Rigor: Caroline Watt |url=https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/searching-for-rigor-caroline-watt/ |website=Skeptical Inquirer |publisher=Center for Inquiry |access-date=9 April 2021 |date=21 January 2021}}</ref>
==Selected publications==
| |||