Content deleted Content added
|
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
|
Article 5.2 bans algorithmic video surveillance only if it is conducted in real time. Exceptions allowing real-time algorithmic video surveillance include policing aims including "a real and present or real and foreseeable threat of terrorist attack".<ref name="LQDN_technosolutionist_goldrush">{{cite Q|Q126064181|url-status=live}}</ref>
Recital 31 of the act prohibitsstates that it aims to prohibit "AI systems providing social scoring of natural persons by public or private actors", but allows for "lawful evaluation practices of natural persons that are carried out for a specific purpose in accordance with Union and national law."<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0138_EN.html |title=European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2024 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union Legislative Acts (COM(2021)0206 – C9-0146/2021 – 2021/0106(COD)) |access-date=24 May 2024 |archive-date=21 May 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240521164731/https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0138_EN.html |url-status=live }}</ref> [[La Quadrature du Net]] interprets this exemption as permitting sector-specific social scoring systems,<ref name="LQDN_technosolutionist_goldrush" /> such as the suspicion score used by the French family payments agency {{ill|Caisse d'allocations familiales|fr|Caisse d'allocations familiales (France)}}.<ref name="LQDN_notation_CAF">{{cite Q|Q126066451|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="LQDN_technosolutionist_goldrush" />
=== Institutional governance ===
|
