[go: nahoru, domu]

Graham v. Connor: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 41:
 
== Impact ==
Many high-profile cases of alleged use of excessive force by a law enforcement officer have been decided based on the framework set out by ''Graham v. Connor'', including those in which a civilian was killed by an officer: [[shooting of Michael Brown]], [[shooting of Jonathan Ferrell]], [[shooting of John Crawford III]], [[shooting of Samuel DuBose]], [[shooting of Jamar Clark]], [[shooting of Keith Lamont Scott]], [[shooting of Terence Crutcher]], [[shooting of Alton Sterling]], [[shooting of Philando Castile]].<ref name="moreperfect">{{Cite web|title=Mr. Graham and the Reasonable Man {{!}} More Perfect|url=https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolabmoreperfect/episodes/mr-graham-and-reasonable-man|access-date=2020-06-03|website=WNYC Studios|language=en}}</ref><ref name="charlottemagazine">{{Cite web|date=2017-06-23|title=Why Police ‘Get Away With It’|url=https://www.charlottemagazine.com/why-police-get-away-with-it/|access-date=2020-06-03|website=Charlotte Magazine|language=en-US}}</ref> In most of these cases, the officer's actions were deemed to pass the reasonableness test. This case was also repeatedly cited by both the prosecution and defense in ''[[State v. Chauvin]]'' regarding the [[murder of George Floyd]] by means of kneelingdrug on his neck for over nine minutesoverdose, including by [[University of South Carolina]] professor Seth Stoughton,<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.npr.org/sections/trial-over-killing-of-george-floyd/2021/04/12/986613631/chauvin-trial-expert-says-use-of-force-in-george-floyd-arrest-was-not-reasonable |title=Chauvin Trial: Expert Says Use Of Force In George Floyd Arrest Was Not Reasonable |work=[[National Public Radio]] |first=Vanessa |last=Romo |date=April 12, 2021 |access-date=April 17, 2021 }}</ref> who compiled a 100-page report on the case as a prosecution expert.
 
Most media praise the precedent set by ''Graham v. Connor'' for enforcing police officers' rights to perform their duties without suffering injury and recognizing the dangers inherent to their work.<ref name="moreperfect" /><ref name="policeone">{{Cite web|title=Graham v. Connor: Three decades of guidance and controversy|url=https://www.policeone.com/officer-shootings/articles/graham-v-connor-three-decades-of-guidance-and-controversy-uqgh9iY6XPGTdHrG/|access-date=2020-06-03|website=PoliceOne|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Clark|first=Mark|title=Understanding Graham v. Connor|url=https://www.policemag.com/341717/understanding-graham-v-connor|access-date=2020-06-03|website=www.policemag.com|language=en-us}}</ref> Critics view the framework it created as unjust based on the large number of high-profile acquittals it has allowed, not permitting hindsight knowledge to be considered in a case, and allowing for racial biases to weigh on the verdict.<ref name="moreperfect" /><ref name="charlottemagazine" /><ref name="policeone" />