Editing Doe v. Groody
Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable through citations to reliable sources.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
⚫ | |||
{{Short description|Lawsuit}} |
|||
| name = Doe v. Groody |
|||
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}} |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
| image = US-CourtOfAppeals-3rdCircuit-Seal.png |
|||
|Litigants=Doe v. Groody |
|||
| imagesize = |
|||
⚫ | |||
| imagelink = |
|||
|CourtSeal=Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.svg |
|||
| imagealt = |
|||
|ArgueDate= |
|||
| caption = |
|||
|ArgueYear= |
|||
| full name = |
|||
|DecideDate=October 10, |
|||
| date decided = October 10, 1990 |
|||
|DecideYear=1990 |
|||
⚫ | |||
|FullName= |
|||
| transcripts = |
|||
|Citations=[[Case citation|361]] [[F.3d]] [https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/361/232/582011/ 232] (3rd Cir. 2004) |
|||
⚫ | |||
|Prior= |
|||
| prior actions = |
|||
|Subsequent= |
|||
| subsequent actions = |
|||
|Holding= |
|||
| opinions = '''Majority:''' Chertoff<br>'''Dissent:''' Alito |
|||
⚫ | |||
| keywords = |
|||
|Majority=Chertoff |
|||
|JoinMajority=Ambro |
|||
|Dissent=Alito |
|||
|LawsApplied= |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
⚫ | The '''''Doe v. Groody''''', |
||
⚫ | The '''''Doe v. Groody''''', 361 F.3d 232 (3d Cir. 2004) [[lawsuit]] concerned a [[strip-search]] of a 10-year-old girl and her mother despite the fact that neither were [[Crime|criminal]] suspects nor named in any [[search warrant]]. In applying for a search warrant, officers requested the right to search whoever was in the house and were refused that request. |
||
==Background== |
|||
The [[Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania]] Drug Task Force suspected the husband and father of the plaintiffs of selling [[methamphetamines]] so they procured a search warrant for him, the house, his car and anyone customers that were present. The wife and daughter were not listed as suspects. When the police were executing the warrant, they had a female [[parking enforcement officer]] take the wife and daughter to the bathroom and perform a strip search but no drugs were found on them. When the pair sued, the police officers claimed [[qualified immunity]]. |
|||
==Majority opinion== |
==Majority opinion== |
||
Line 40: | Line 35: | ||
==Sources== |
==Sources== |
||
{{wikisource}} |
|||
*[http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/3rd/024532p.pdf PDF of full text of the legal document] |
|||
*{{caselaw source |
|||
⚫ | |||
| courtlistener =https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/785423/john-doe-parent-and-natural-guardian-of-mary-doe-a-minor-jane-doe-parent/ |
|||
| justia =https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/361/232/582011/ |
|||
| other_source1 = OpenJurist |
|||
| other_url1 =https://openjurist.org/361/f3d/232 |
|||
| other_source2 = Google Scholar |
|||
| other_url2 =https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=217238514071578680 |
|||
}} |
|||
[[Category:United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit cases]] |
[[Category:United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit cases]] |
||
⚫ | |||
[[Category:History of Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania]] |
[[Category:History of Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania]] |
||
[[Category:United States Fourth Amendment case law]] |
[[Category:United States Fourth Amendment case law]] |
||
⚫ | |||
[[Category:United States controlled substances case law]] |
|||
[[Category:Strip search]] |