Revision as of 19:45, 18 May 2006 edit 72.75.39.31 (talk) →‎Majority opinion ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:47, 18 May 2006 edit undo Liffer (talk \| contribs) 97 edits m →‎Alito's dissenting opinion Next edit →
Line 13: Judge [[Michael Chertoff]]’s majority opinion asserted that Alito’s position would effectively nullify the [[Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution\|Fourth Amendment’s]] warrant requirement and “transform the judicial officer into little more than the cliché rubber stamp.” Media attention on the case and Alito's opinion grew when he was nominated by [[President Bush]] to the [[Supreme Court of the United ~~Sates~~States\|Supreme Court]] in 2005. Opponents pointed to his opinion to support claims that Alito would try to overturn Fourth Amendment precedents if confirmed to the Court. ==Sources==

Doe v. Groody: Difference between revisions