[go: nahoru, domu]

Dimensional analysis: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
cite debate of dimensionlessness of angles
Cubefox (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 2:
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2021}}
 
In [[engineering]] and [[science]], '''dimensional analysis''' is the analysis of the relationships between different [[Physical quantity|physical quantities]] by identifying their [[base quantity|base quantities]] (such as [[length]], [[mass]], [[time]], and [[electric current]]) and [[units of measurement]] (such as metersmetres and grams) and tracking these dimensions as calculations or comparisons are performed. The term dimensional analysis is also used to refer to [[conversion of units]] from one dimensional unit to another, which can be used to evaluate scientific formulae.
 
<!--use bold, because target of redirect-->
'''''Commensurable''''' physical quantities are of the same [[Kind of quantity|kind]] and have the same dimension, and can be directly compared to each other, even if they are expressed in differing units of measurement; e.g., metersmetres and feet, gallonsgrams and literspounds, seconds and years. ''Incommensurable'' physical [[Quantity|quantities]] are of different [[Kind of quantity|kinds]] and have different dimensions, and can not be directly compared to each other, no matter what [[units]] they are expressed in, e.g. metres and grams, seconds and grams, metres and seconds. For example, asking whether a gram is larger than an hour is meaningless.
 
Any physically meaningful [[equation]], or [[inequality (mathematics)|inequality]], ''must'' have the same dimensions on its left and right sides, a property known as ''dimensional homogeneity''. Checking for dimensional homogeneity is a common application of dimensional analysis, serving as a plausibility check on [[Formal proof|derived]] equations and [[Computation|computations]]. It also serves as a guide and constraint in deriving equations that may describe a physical [[system]] in the absence of a more rigorous derivation.
 
The concept of '''physical dimension''', and of dimensional analysis, was introduced by [[Joseph Fourier]] in 1822.<ref name="Bolster">{{cite journal|last1=Bolster|first1=Diogo|last2=Hershberger|first2=Robert E.|last3=Donnelly|first3=Russell E.|title=Dynamic similarity, the dimensionless science|url=https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article-abstract/64/9/42/413713/Dynamic-similarity-the-dimensionless|journal=Physics Today|doi=10.1063/PT.3.1258|date=September 2011|volume=64|issue=9|pages=42–47|url-access=subscription}}</ref>{{rp|42}}
Line 72:
The dimension of the physical quantity [[electric charge]] {{math|''Q''}} is
: <math>\operatorname{dim}Q
= \text{current} \times \text{time}
= \mathsf{T}\mathsf{I} .</math>
 
The dimension of the physical quantity [[electric potential differencevoltage]] {{math|''V''}} is
: <math>\operatorname{dim}V
= \frac{\text{power}}{\text{current}}
= \frac{\mathsf{T}^{-3}\mathsf{L}^2\mathsf{M}}{\mathsf{I}}
= \mathsf{T^{-3}}\mathsf{L}^2\mathsf{M} \mathsf{I}^{-1} .</math>
Line 139 ⟶ 141:
To compare, add, or subtract quantities with the same dimensions but expressed in different units, the standard procedure is first to convert them all to the same unit. For example, to compare 32 metres with 35 yards, use {{nowrap|1=1&nbsp;yard = 0.9144&nbsp;m}} to convert 35 yards to 32.004&nbsp;m.
 
A related principle is that any physical law that accurately describes the real world must be independent of the units used to measure the physical variables.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=de Jong |first1=Frits J. |url=https://archive.org/details/dimensionalanaly0000jong |title=Dimensional analysis for economists |last2=Quade |first2=Wilhelm |publisher=North Holland |year=1967 |page=[https://archive.org/details/dimensionalanaly0000jong/page/28 28] |url-access=registration}}</ref> For example, [[Newton's laws of motion]] must hold true whether distance is measured in miles or kilometres. This principle gives rise to the form that a conversion factor between atwo unitunits that measuresmeasure the same dimension must take: multiplication by a simple constant. It also ensures equivalence; for example, if two buildings are the same height in feet, then they must be the same height in metres.
 
== Conversion factor ==
Line 149 ⟶ 151:
 
=== Mathematics ===
A simple application of dimensional analysis to mathematics is in computing the form of the [[N-sphere#Volume of the n-ball|volume of an {{math|''n''}}-ball]] (the solid ball in ''n'' dimensions), or the area of its surface, the [[n-sphere|{{math|''n''}}-sphere]]: being an {{math|''n''}}-dimensional figure, the volume scales as {{math|''x''{{sup|''n''}}}}, while the surface area, being {{math|(''n'' − 1)}}-dimensional, scales as {{math|''x''{{sup|''n''−1}}}}. Thus the volume of the {{math|''n''}}-ball in terms of the radius is {{math|''C''{{isupsub|''n''}}''r''{{isup|''n''}}}}, for some constant {{math|''C''{{isupsub|''n''}}}}. Determining the constant takes more involved mathematics, but the form can be deduced and checked by dimensional analysis alone.
 
=== Finance, economics, and accounting ===
Line 174 ⟶ 176:
In 1822, the important Napoleonic scientist [[Joseph Fourier]] made the first credited important contributions<ref>{{Citation |last=Mason |first=Stephen Finney |title=A history of the sciences |page=169 |year=1962 |place=New York |publisher=Collier Books |isbn=978-0-02-093400-4}}</ref> based on the idea that physical laws like [[Newton's second law|{{nowrap|1=''F'' = ''ma''}}]] should be independent of the units employed to measure the physical variables.
 
[[James Clerk Maxwell]] played a major role in establishing modern use of dimensional analysis by distinguishing mass, length, and time as fundamental units, while referring to other units as derived.<ref name="maxwell">{{Citation |last=Roche |first=John J |title=The Mathematics of Measurement: A Critical History |page=203 |year=1998 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-0-387-91581-4 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=eiQOqS-Q6EkC&pg=PA203|quote = Beginning apparently with Maxwell, mass, length and time began to be interpreted as having a privileged fundamental character and all other quantities as derivative, not merely with respect to measurement, but with respect to their physical status as well.}}</ref> Although Maxwell defined length, time and mass to be "the three fundamental units", he also noted that gravitational mass can be derived from length and time by assuming a form of [[Newton's law of universal gravitation]] in which the [[gravitational constant]] {{math|''G''}} is taken as [[1|unity]], thereby defining {{nowrap|1=M = T<sup>−2</sup>L<sup>3</sup>}}.<ref name="maxwell2">{{Citation |last=Maxwell |first=James Clerk |title=A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism |page=4 |year=1873}}</ref> By assuming a form of [[Coulomb's law]] in which the [[Coulomb constant]] ''k''<sub>e</sub> is taken as unity, Maxwell then determined that the dimensions of an electrostatic unit of charge were {{nowrap|1=Q = T<sup>−1</sup>L<sup>3/2</sup>M<sup>1/2</sup>}},<ref name="maxwell3">{{Citation |last= Maxwell |first=James Clerk |title=A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism |series=Clarendon Press series |page=45 |year=1873 |publisher=Oxford |hdl=2027/uc1.l0065867749 |hdl-access=free}}</ref> which, after substituting his {{nowrap|1=M = T<sup>−2</sup>L<sup>3</sup>}} equation for mass, results in charge having the same dimensions as mass, viz. {{nowrap|1=Q = T<sup>−2</sup>L<sup>3</sup>}}.
 
Dimensional analysis is also used to derive relationships between the physical quantities that are involved in a particular phenomenon that one wishes to understand and characterize. It was used for the first time in this way in 1872 by [[Lord Rayleigh]], who was trying to understand why the sky is blue.<ref>{{harv|Pesic|2005}}</ref> Rayleigh first published the technique in his 1877 book ''The Theory of Sound''.<ref>{{Citation |last=Rayleigh |first=Baron John William Strutt |title=The Theory of Sound |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kvxYAAAAYAAJ |year=1877 |publisher=Macmillan}}</ref>
Line 426 ⟶ 428:
=== Affine quantities ===
{{further|Affine space}}
Some discussions of dimensional analysis implicitly describe all quantities as mathematical vectors. (In mathematics scalars are considered a special case of vectors;{{citation needed|date=September 2013}} vectors can be added to or subtracted from other vectors, and, inter alia, multiplied or divided by scalars. If a vector is used to define a position, this assumes an implicit point of reference: an [[origin (mathematics)|origin]]. While this is useful and often perfectly adequate, allowing many important errors to be caught, it can fail to model certain aspects of physics. A more rigorous approach requires distinguishing between position and displacement (or moment in time versus duration, or absolute temperature versus temperature change).
 
Consider points on a line, each with a position with respect to a given origin, and distances among them. Positions and displacements all have units of length, but their meaning is not interchangeable:
Line 521 ⟶ 523:
{{see also|Angle#Dimensional analysis}}
 
[[Angle]]s are, by convention, considered to be dimensionless quantities (although the wisdom of this is contested <ref>{{ cite journal | title=Angles in the SI: a detailed proposal for solving the problem | year=2021 | pages=053002 | journal=Metrologia | doi=10.1088/1681-7575/ac023f | volume=58 | issue=5 | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ac023f | last1=Quincey | first1= Paul | arxiv=2108.05704 }}</ref>) . As an example, consider again the projectile problem in which a point mass is launched from the origin {{math|1=(''x'', ''y'') = (0, 0)}} at a speed {{math|''v''}} and angle {{math|''θ''}} above the ''x''-axis, with the force of gravity directed along the negative ''y''-axis. It is desired to find the range {{math|''R''}}, at which point the mass returns to the ''x''-axis. Conventional analysis will yield the dimensionless variable {{math|1=''π'' = ''R'' ''g''/''v''<sup>2</sup>}}, but offers no insight into the relationship between {{math|''R''}} and {{math|''θ''}}.
 
Siano has suggested that the directed dimensions of Huntley be replaced by using ''orientational symbols'' {{math|1<sub>x</sub>&nbsp;1<sub>y</sub>&nbsp;1<sub>z</sub>}} to denote vector directions, and an orientationless symbol 1<sub>0</sub>.<ref>{{harvs|txt=yes|last=Siano|year1=1985-I|year2=1985-II}}</ref> Thus, Huntley's L<sub>{{math|x}}</sub> becomes L1<sub>{{math|x}}</sub> with L specifying the dimension of length, and {{math|1<sub>x</sub>}} specifying the orientation. Siano further shows that the orientational symbols have an algebra of their own. Along with the requirement that {{math|1=1<sub>''i''</sub><sup>−1</sup> = 1<sub>''i''</sub>}}, the following multiplication table for the orientation symbols results:
Line 718 ⟶ 720:
| journal = Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers
| volume = 66 | issue = 671
| pages = 671–678
| doi = 10.1115/1.4018140
}}
* {{citation
Line 845 ⟶ 849:
| chapter=1. Introduction, Measurement, Estimating §1.8 Dimensions and Dimensional Analysis
| year=2014
| publisher=Pearson
| isbn=978-0-321-62592-2 | oclc=853154197
}}