Content deleted Content added
Isaidnoway (talk | contribs) clean up pages with duplicate reference names, ref only needs to be defined one time, then just use the ref name |
m convert special characters found by Wikipedia:Typo Team/moss (via WP:JWB) |
||
Line 95:
|-
! 1080
| [[#1280x1080|1280]] ({{ratio|32|27}}) || [[#1440x1080|1440]] || || || || 1920 [[#FHD|(F)HD]] / 2K || [[#2160x1080|2160]], <br>[[#2280x1080|2280]] ({{ratio|19|9}}), <br>[[#2340x1080|2340]] ({{ratio|19
|-
! 1152
Line 107:
|-
! 1440
| || || 2160 [[#FHD+|FHD+]] || || || 2560 <!--2.5K--> [[#2560 × 1440 (QHD)|(W)QHD]] || [[#UWHDplus|2880]], <br>[[#UWHDplus|2960]] ({{ratio|18
|-
! 1536
Line 324:
The resolution {{resx|3840|1600}} has a 12:5 aspect ratio, i.e. 2.4 or 21.6:9, which is commonly marketed as simply "21:9". It is equivalent to [[#WQXGA|WQXGA]] ({{resx|2560|1600}}) extended in width by 50%, or [[#4K UHD|4K UHD]] ({{resx|3840|2160}}) reduced in height by 26%. This resolution is commonly encountered in cinematic 4K content that has been cropped vertically to a widescreen aspect ratio. The first monitor to support this resolution was the 37.5-inch LG 38UC99-W. Other vendors followed, with Dell U3818DW, HP Z38c, and Acer XR382CQK.
This resolution has been referred to as '''UW4K''', '''WQHD+''', '''UWQHD+''' or '''QHD+''',<ref>{{cite web |title=38" Class 21:9 UltraWide
=== {{resx|3840|2160}} (4K UHD) {{anchor|3840x2160|3840 × 2160|4K UHD|UHD 4K|UHD|4K|UHD-1|QFHD}} ===
Line 343:
When support for 4K at 60{{nbsp}}Hz was added in DisplayPort 1.2, no DisplayPort timing controllers (TCONs) existed which were capable of processing the necessary amount of data from a single video stream. As a result, the first 4K monitors from 2013 and early 2014, such as the Sharp PN-K321, Asus PQ321Q, and Dell UP2414Q and UP3214Q, were addressed internally as two {{resx|1920|2160}} monitors side by side instead of a single display and made use of DisplayPort's Multi-Stream Transport (MST) feature to multiplex a separate signal for each half over the connection, splitting the data between two timing controllers.<ref>{{cite web |title=4K Ultra High Resolution Development |url=https://developer.nvidia.com/4k-ultra-high-resolution-development |work=NVIDIA Developer Zone |date=13 September 2013 |publisher=NVIDIA |access-date=2013-12-17}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=ASUS PQ321Q 31.5-in 4K 60 Hz Tiled Monitor Review |url=https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Displays/ASUS-PQ321Q-315-4K-Tiled-Monitor-Review/DisplayPort-12-MST-and-STMicro-Athena-Contr |last=Shrout |first=Ryan |date=19 July 2013 |publisher=PC Perspective |access-date=2016-01-07}}</ref> Newer timing controllers became available in 2014, and after mid-2014 new 4K monitors such as the [[Asus]] PB287Q no longer rely on MST tiling technique to achieve 4K at 60{{nbsp}}Hz,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://pcdiy.asus.com/2014/01/pb287q-4k-for-the-masses |title=PB287Q 4K For The Masses – CES 2014 |publisher=ASUSTek |access-date=2014-08-20 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140921160015/http://pcdiy.asus.com/2014/01/pb287q-4k-for-the-masses/ |archive-date=2014-09-21 |url-status=dead}}</ref> instead, using the standard SST (Single-Stream Transport) approach.<ref>{{cite web |title=Video Perspective: Samsung U28D590D 28-in 4K Single Stream 60 Hz Monitor Review |url=http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Displays/Video-Perspective-Samsung-U28D590D-28-4K-Single-Stream-60-Hz-Monitor-Review |last=Shrout |first=Ryan |date=9 May 2014 |publisher=PC Perspective |access-date=2016-01-07}}</ref>
In 2015, Sony announced the [[Xperia Z5 Premium]], the first smartphone with a 4K display,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.phonearena.com/phones/Sony-Xperia-Z5-Premium_id9612 |title=Sony Xperia Z5 Premium specs |publisher=phoneArena.com |access-date=2016-02-08}}</ref> and in 2017 Sony announced the Xperia XZ Premium, the first smartphone with a 4K [[High-dynamic-range video|HDR]] display.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.sonymobile.com/global-en/products/phones/xperia-xz-premium |title=
=== {{resx|4096|2160}} (DCI 4K) {{anchor|4096x2160|4096 × 2160|DCI 4K|4K DCI}} ===
Line 354:
<!-- DO NOT ADD NAMES to the header unless they are established by the authority of a standards document (which you should reference) or industry-wide consensus (NOT just one or two companies, or a journalist here or there). You may mention non-consensus names in the section body, but do NOT add them to the header, and do not make up your own name that has just been extrapolated from past patterns but never actually used by anyone. -->
The resolution {{resx|5120|2160}} is equivalent to 4K UHD ({{resx|3840|2160}}) extended in width by 33%, giving it a 64:27 aspect ratio (2.{{overline|370}} or 21.{{overline|3}}:9, commonly marketed as simply "21:9") and 11,059,200 total pixels. It is exactly double the size of [[#2560x1080|{{resx|2560|1080}}]] in both dimensions, for a total of four times as many pixels. The first displays to support this resolution were 105-inch televisions, the LG 105UC9 and the Samsung UN105S9W.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.geek.com/news/forget-4k-lg-ships-a-105-inch-5k-tv-1600612 |title=Forget 4K, LG ships a 105-inch 5K TV |last=Humphries |first=Matthew |date=29 July 2014 |publisher=Ziff Davis |access-date=2018-05-29 |archive-date=2018-06-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612114501/https://www.geek.com/news/forget-4k-lg-ships-a-105-inch-5k-tv-1600612/ |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.kitguru.net/peripherals/monitors/anton-shilov/samsung-prices-its-105-5k-uhd-curved-tv-120-thousand |title=Samsung prices its 105" 5K UHD curved TV: $120,000 |last=Shilov |first=Anton |date=23 July 2014 |publisher=Kitguru |access-date=2018-05-29}}</ref> In December 2017, LG announced a 34-inch {{resx|5120|2160}} monitor, the 34WK95U,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/12190/lg-announces-34wk95u |title=LG Announces the 5K UltraWide 34WK95U: A 'Nano IPS' Monitor with a HDR600 Badge |last=Shilov |first=Anton |date=28 December 2017 |work=AnandTech |publisher=Purch |access-date=2018-05-29}}</ref> and in January 2021 the 40-inch 40WP95C.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Broekhuijsen |first=Niels |date=2021-01-14 |title=LG's Huge 40-Inch Monitor Is First To Feature Thunderbolt 4 |url=https://www.tomshardware.com/news/lg-40WP95C-tb4-ces |access-date=2021-01-23 |website=Tom's Hardware |language=en}}</ref> LG refers to this resolution as "5K2K WUHD".<ref>{{cite web |title=LG 34BK95U: 34 Inch Class 21:9 UltraWide
=== {{resx|5120|2880}} (5K) {{anchor|5120x2880|5120 × 2880|5K|UHD+|UHDplus|5K UHD+}} ===
{{main|5K resolution}}
The resolution {{resx|5120|2880}}, commonly referred to as '''5K''' or '''{{resx|5K|3K}}''', has a 16:9 aspect ratio and 14,745,600 pixels. Although it is not established by any of the UHDTV standards, some manufacturers such as Dell have referred to it as "UHD+".<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.dell.com/support/article/ee/en/eebsdt1/sln297129/issues-when-using-uhd-4k-x-2k-and-uhd-5k-x-3k-displays?lang=en |title=Issues users need to understand when using UHD (4K x 2K) and UHD+ (5K x 3K) displays (Text and icons are too small etc.) |publisher=Dell |access-date=2016-01-06}}</ref> It is exactly double the pixel count of [[#QHD|QHD]] ({{resx|2560|1440}}) in both dimensions for a total of four times as many pixels, and is 33% larger than 4K UHD ({{resx|3840|2160}}) in both dimensions for a total of 1.{{overline|77}} times as many pixels. The line count of 2880 is also the [[least common multiple]] of 480 and 576, the scanline count of NTSC and PAL, respectively. Such a resolution can vertically scale SD content to fit by [[natural number]]s (6 for NTSC and 5 for PAL). Horizontal scaling of SD is always fractional (non-anamorphic: 5.
The first display with this resolution was the Dell UltraSharp UP2715K, announced on September 5, 2014.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.extremetech.com/computing/189342-dell-unveils-5k-desktop-monitor-with-almost-2x-the-pixels-of-your-puny-4k-display |title=Dell unveils 5K desktop monitor with almost 2x the pixels of your puny 4K display |last=Anthony |first=Sebastian |date=5 September 2014 |work=ExtremeTech |publisher=Ziff Davis |access-date=2014-10-19 }}</ref> On October 16, 2014, Apple announced the [[iMac (Intel-based)|iMac]] with [[Retina Display|Retina 5K display]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.apple.com/apple-events/2014-oct-event |publisher=Apple |title=Apple Special Event. October 16, 2014. |access-date=2014-10-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |url=https://www.wired.com/2014/10/apple-5k-faq |title=Answers to All of Your Questions About Apple's 5K iMac Display |last=Bonnington |first=Christina |date=17 October 2014 |magazine=Wired |publisher=Condé Nast |access-date=2014-10-19}}</ref>
Line 376:
DisplayPort{{nbsp}}1.3, finalized by [[Video Electronics Standards Association|VESA]] in late 2014, added support for {{resx|7680|4320}} at 30{{nbsp}}Hz (or 60{{nbsp}}Hz with {{YCbCr}} 4:2:0 subsampling). VESA's [[Display Stream Compression]] (DSC), which was part of early DisplayPort{{nbsp}}1.3 drafts and would have enabled 8K at 60{{nbsp}}Hz without subsampling, was cut from the specification prior to publication of the final draft.<ref>{{cite web |title=VESA Releases DisplayPort 1.3 Standard: 50% More Bandwidth, New Features |url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/8533/vesa-releases-displayport-13-standard-50-more-bandwidth-new-features |last=Smith |first=Ryan |date=16 September 2014 |work=AnandTech |publisher=Purch |access-date=2016-01-06}}</ref>
DSC support was reintroduced with the publication of DisplayPort{{nbsp}}1.4 in March 2016. Using DSC, a "visually lossless" form of compression, formats up to {{resx|7680|4320}} (8K UHD) at 60{{nbsp}}Hz with [[High-dynamic-range video|HDR]] and 30{{nbsp}}bit/px color depth are possible without subsampling.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.displayport.org/pr/vesa-publishes-displayport-standard-version-1-4 |title=VESA Publishes
== Video Graphics Array (VGA and derivatives) {{anchor|Video Graphics Array}}==
Line 427:
'''Quarter-QVGA''' ('''QQVGA''' or '''qqVGA'''){{Citation needed|date=May 2023}} denotes a resolution of {{resx|160|120}} (4:3 storage aspect ratio) or {{resx|120|160}} pixels, usually used in displays of handheld devices. The term Quarter-QVGA signifies a resolution of one fourth the number of pixels in a [[#QVGA (320×240)|QVGA]] display (half the number of vertical and half the number of horizontal pixels) which itself has one fourth the number of pixels in a [[Video Graphics Array|VGA]] display. There are also devices with QQVGA {{resx|160|128}} (5:4 storage aspect ratio).<ref>[https://www.sony.com/electronics/support/res/manuals/4154/41544081M.pdf Sony NW-E390 SERIES Walkman Specifications] with QQVGA (160 × 128) on sony.com</ref>{{Failed verification|date=May 2023}}
The abbreviation ''qqVGA'' may be used to distinguish ''quarter'' from ''quad'', just like ''qVGA''.<ref>{{cite journal |title=2.2 inch qqVGA AMOLED Drove by Ultra Low Temperature Poly Silicon (ULTPS) TFT Direct Fabricated Below 200 °C |first1=Jang Yeon |last1=Kwon |first2=Ji Sim |last2=Jung |first3=Kyung Bae |last3=Park |first4=Jong Man |last4=Kim |first5=Hyuck |last5=Lim |first6=Sang Yoon |last6=Lee |first7=Jong Min |last7=Kim |first8=Takashi |last8=Noguchi |first9=Ji Ho |last9=Hur |display-authors = 8 |journal=SID 2006 Digest |volume=37 |issue=2 |year=2006 |pages=1358–61 |doi=10.1889/1.2433233|s2cid=110488279 }}</ref>
=== {{resx|240|160}} {{anchor|240x160|240 × 160|HQVGA}}===
Line 572:
The 854 pixel width is rounded up from 853.{{overline|3}}:
:{{math|480 × {{frac|16|9}} {{=}} {{frac|7680|9}} {{=}}
Since a pixel must be a whole number, rounding up to 854 ensures inclusion of the entire image. {{resx|853|480}} is the 16:9 equivalent for [[Pixel aspect ratio#Pixel aspect ratios of common video formats|NTSC]] (480 lines) on a display with square pixels. Plasma and other digital TV sets with this resolution were marketed as [[enhanced-definition television]] (EDTV) at the time.
Line 603:
=== {{resx|1280|960}} (QuadVGA) {{anchor|1280x960|1280 × 960|QuadVGA|SXGAminus|SXGA-|UVGA}} ===
'''QuadVGA'''<ref name="Miyotadca QuadVGA">{{cite web |url=https://www.miyotadca.com/mdca_product/quadvga/ |title=QuadVGA — 1280×960, 0.
It is sometimes unofficially called '''''SXGA−'''''{{Citation needed|date=May 2023}} to avoid confusion with the [[#SXGA|SXGA]] standard ({{resx|1280|1024}}). Elsewhere, this 4:3 resolution was supposedly also called '''''UVGA''''' (''Ultra VGA''),{{Citation needed|date=May 2023}} or '''''SXVGA''''' (''Super eXtended VGA''){{Citation needed|date=May 2023}}.
Line 788:
==== {{resx|1600|1024}} {{anchor|1600x1024|1600 × 1024}} ====
The name WSXGA is also used to describe a resolution of {{resx|1600|1024}},<ref name="Silex technology WXGA, FWXGA, WSXGA"/> which has an aspect ratio of 25:16 (5
==== {{resx|1280|854}} {{anchor|1280x854|1280 × 854}} ====
Line 976:
{{resx|2778|1284}} ([[iPhone 12 Pro Max|12]]/[[iPhone 13 Pro Max|13 Pro Max]], [[iPhone 14 Plus|14 Plus]]),
{{resx|2796|1290}} ([[iPhone 14 Pro Max|14]]/[[iPhone 15 Pro Max|15 Pro Max]], [[iPhone 15 Plus|15 Plus]]).
The only Apple smartphone models that shared an ultra-wide {{resratio|19
<!-- === 18.5:9 === -->
Line 988:
<!-- === 19.5:9 === -->
Even wider resolutions with the same aspect ratio of {{resratio|19
<!-- === 20:9 === -->
| |||