Content deleted Content added
Smallbones (talk | contribs) →As a precedent in other disputes: not crystal ball |
Smallbones (talk | contribs) →Positions taken by states: trim map |
||
Line 93:
=== Other events ===
Abkhazia said it would not take part in the "Geneva Talks on Security and Stability in the Caucasus" in June 2010 because of concerns over the objectivity of the co-chairmen who were representatives of the UN, the EU, and OSCE. A spokesman said "Our proposals are being ignored, discussions on the non-renewal of war are being procrastinated, instead secondary questions are being discussed. Thereupon we feel the co-chairmen have no real proposals, and we want to give them time till September to prepare a document, concerning security, and acceptable for all sides. The Geneva discussions are necessary, and it is normal that each party voices its position, but the mediators must be neutral and non-biased. But the mediators fail to conduct discussions in a constructive impartial manner."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.abkhaziagov.org/en/news/detail.php?ID%3D32028 |title=Abkhaz Delegation Renounces ITS Participation in Geneva Talks on Security and Stability in the Caucasus |access-date=2010-06-27 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100630014134/http://www.abkhaziagov.org/en/news/detail.php?ID=32028 |archive-date=30 June 2010 |df=dmy-all }}</ref>
=== States formally recognising Abkhazia or South Ossetia as independent ===
| |||