[go: nahoru, domu]

Saṃsāra (Buddhism): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎Realms of rebirth: moved info downwards
m →‎Characteristics: minor spacing fix
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{short description|Cycle of repeated birth, mundane existence and dying again}}
{{other uses|Samsara (disambiguation)}}
[[File:Traditional bhavachakra wall mural of Yama holding the wheel of life, Buddha pointing the way out.jpg|thumb|A [[thangka]] showing the [[bhavacakra]] with the ancient five cyclic realms of ''[[saṃsāra]]'' in [[Buddhist cosmology]]. Medieval and contemporary texts typically describe six realms of reincarnation.]]{{Buddhist term
| fontsize=30%
| title=saṃsāra
| pi= saṃsāra ([[Devanagari|Dev]]: संसार)
| sa= saṃsāra, sangsara ([[Devanagari|Dev]]: संसार)
| bn=সংসার (sôngsarôsôngsar)
| en= cycle of existence, endless rebirth, wheel of dharma, beginningless time
| bo=འཁོར་བ་
Line 15:
| ko-Latn=
| Lao= ວັດຕະສົງສານ
| km = សង្សារ, វដ្ដសង្សារ
| km = សង្សារ, វដ្ដសង្សារ<br />([[Romanization of Khmer#UNGEGN|UNGEGN]]: {{transl|km|sângsar}}, {{transl|km|vôddâsângsar}}; [[Romanization of Khmer#ALA-LC Romanization Tables|ALA-LC]]: {{transl|km|saṅsār}}, {{transl|km|vaṭṭasaṅsār}}; {{IPA-km|sɑŋsaː|IPA}}, {{IPA-km|ʋɔəɗasɑŋsaː|}})
| km-Latn=sângsar{{noitalic|,}} vôddâsângsar
| mn={{MongolUnicode|ᠣᠷᠴᠢᠯᠠᠩ}}, орчлон
(orchilang, orchlon)
| my=သံသရာ
| my-Latn=θàɰ̃ðajà
| tl=samssaraSamsala
| te=[[:te:సంసారం]]
| th=[[:th:วัฏสงสาร|วัฏสงสาร]]
Line 27 ⟶ 28:
| zh-Latn=shēngsǐ, lúnhuí, liúzhuǎn
| si=[[:si:සංසාරය|සංසාරය]] (sansāra)
|Lao: ວັດຕະສົງສານ|lo=ວັດຕະສົງສານ}}
|Lao: ວັດຕະສົງສານ|lo=ວັດຕະສົງສານ}}'''Saṃsāra''' ({{lang-sa|संसार}}, {{lang-pi|saṃsāra}}; also ''samsara'') in [[Buddhism]] and [[Hinduism]] is the beginningless cycle of repeated [[Rebirth (Buddhism)|birth]], mundane existence and dying again.{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=58, '''Quote:''' "Buddhism shares with Hinduism the doctrine of Samsara, whereby all beings pass through an unceasing cycle of birth, death and rebirth until they find a means of liberation from the cycle. However, Buddhism differs from Hinduism in rejecting the assertion that every human being possesses a changeless [[soul]] which constitutes his or her ultimate identity, and which transmigrates from one incarnation to the next.}} Samsara is considered to be ''[[dukkha]]'', suffering, and in general unsatisfactory and painful,{{sfn|Wilson|2010}} perpetuated by desire and ''[[Avidyā (Buddhism)|avidya]]'' (ignorance), and the resulting [[karma]].{{sfn|Juergensmeyer|Roof|2011|p=271-272}}{{sfn|McClelland|2010|p=172, 240}}{{sfn|Williams|Tribe|Wynne|2012|p=18–19, chapter 1}}
 
|Lao: ວັດຕະສົງສານ|lo=ວັດຕະສົງສານ}}'''Saṃsāra''' ({{lang-sa|संसार}}, {{lang-pi|saṃsāra}}; also ''samsara'') in [[Buddhism]] and [[Hinduism]] is the beginningless cycle of repeated [[Rebirth (Buddhism)|birth]], mundane existence and dying again.{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=58, '''Quote:''' "Buddhism shares with Hinduism the doctrine of Samsara, whereby all beings pass through an unceasing cycle of birth, death and rebirth until they find a means of liberation from the cycle. However, Buddhism differs from Hinduism in rejecting the assertion that every human being possesses a changeless [[soul]] which constitutes his or her ultimate identity, and which transmigrates from one incarnation to the next.}} Samsara is considered to be ''[[dukkha]]'', suffering, and in general unsatisfactory and painful,{{sfn|Wilson|2010}} perpetuated by desire and ''[[Avidyā (Buddhism)|avidya]]'' (ignorance), and the resulting [[karma]].{{sfn|Juergensmeyer|Roof|2011|p=271-272}}{{sfn|McClelland|2010|p=172, 240}}{{sfn|Williams|Tribe|Wynne|2012|p=18–19, chapter 1}}
Rebirths occur in six realms of existence, namely three good realms (heavenly, demi-god, human) and three evil realms (animal, ghosts, hellish).{{refn|group=note|name=realms2|Earlier Buddhist texts refer to five realms rather than six realms; when described as five realms, the god realm and demi-god realm constitute a single realm.{{sfn|Buswell|2004|p=711-712}}}} Samsara ends if a person attains [[Nirvana (Buddhism)|nirvana]],{{refn|group=note|name=nirvanakc}} the "blowing out" of the desires and the gaining of true insight into [[anicca|impermanence]] and [[anatta|non-self]] reality.{{sfn|Buswell|Gimello|1992|p=7–8, 83–84}}{{sfn|Choong|1999|p=28–29, Quote: "Seeing (''passati'') the nature of things as impermanent leads to the removal of the view of self, and so to the realisation of nirvana."}}{{sfn|Rahula|2014|p=51-58}}
 
Rebirths occur in six realms of existence, namely three good realms ([[Deva (Buddhism)|heavenly]], [[Asura (Buddhism)|demi-god]], human) and three evil realms (animal, [[Preta|ghosts]], [[Naraka (Buddhism)|hellish]]).{{refn|group=note|name=realms2|Earlier Buddhist texts refer to five realms rather than six realms; when described as five realms, the god realm and demi-god realm constitute a single realm.{{sfn|Buswell|2004|p=711-712}}}} Samsara ends if a person attains [[Nirvana (Buddhism)|nirvana]],{{refn|group=note|name=nirvanakc}} the "blowing out" of the desires and the gaining of true insight into [[anicca|impermanence]] and [[anatta|non-self]] reality.{{sfn|Buswell|Gimello|1992|p=7–8, 83–84}}{{sfn|Choong|1999|p=28–29, Quote: "Seeing (''passati'') the nature of things as impermanent leads to the removal of the view of self, and so to the realisation of nirvana."}}{{sfn|Rahula|2014|p=51-58}}
 
==Characteristics==
Line 36 ⟶ 39:
* Ajahn Sucitto: "This continued movement is [...] what is meant by samsāra, the wandering on. According to the Buddha, this process doesn't even stop with death—it's like the habit transfers almost genetically to a new consciousness and body."{{sfn|Ajahn Sucitto|2010|pp=37-38}}}} Samsara is characterized by ''[[dukkha]]'' ("unsatisfactory," "painful").{{refn|group=note|Samsara is characterized by ''dukkha'':
* Chogyam Trungpa: "Samsara arises out of ignorance and is characterized by suffering."{{sfn|Chogyam Trungpa|2009|p=137}}
* Rupert Gethin: "This precisely is the nature of saṃsāra: wandering from life to life with no particular direction or purpose."{{sfn|Gethin|1998|p=119}}}} Samsara relates to the [[Four Noble Truths]] in Buddhism, as [[dukkha]] ("unsatisfactory," "painful") is the essence of Samsara.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Oxford Dictionary of Buddhism|last=Keown|first=Damien|publisher=Oxford University Press, Incorporated|year=2003|isbn=9780198605607|pages=248}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=Oxford Dictionary of Buddhism|last=Keown|first=Damien|publisher=Oxford University Press Incorporated|year=2003|isbn=9780198605607|pages=248|quote="Although not mentioned by name, samsara is the situation that is characterized as suffering (*duhkha) in the first of the *Four Noble Truths (aryasatya)."}}</ref> Every rebirth is temporary and impermanent. In each rebirth one is born and dies, to be reborn elsewhere in accordance with one's own karma.{{sfn|Williams|2002|pp=74-75}} It is perpetuated by one's ''[[Avidyā (Buddhism)|avidya]]'' ("ignorance"), particularly about ''[[anicca]]'' (“impermanence”) and ''[[anatta]]'', (“no-self”){{sfn|Keown|2004|pp=81, 281}}{{sfn|Fowler|1999|p=39–42}} and from craving.{{refn|group=note|name="Ignorance and craving"|Ignorance and craving:
* John Bowker: "In Buddhism, samsāra is the cycle of continuing appearances through the domains of existence (gati), but with no Self (anātman, [ātman means the enduring, immortal self]) being reborn: there is only the continuity of consequence, governed by karma."<ref group=web name=nalanda1>John Bowker. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. 1997. Encyclopedia.com. 24 November 2012 [http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O101-Sasra.html "Saṃsāra."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101023171439/http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O101-Sasra.html |date=2010-10-23 }};<br>{{cite book|author=John Bowker|title=God: A Very Short Introduction|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Te9wBAAAQBAJ|year=2014|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=978-0-19-870895-7|pages=84–86|access-date=2016-09-25|archive-date=2017-01-22|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170122185207/https://books.google.com/books?id=Te9wBAAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}</ref>
* Chogyam Trungpa states: "Cyclic existence [is] the continual repetitive cycle of birth, death, and [[bardo]] that arises from ordinary beings' grasping and fixating on a self and experiences. (...) Samsara arises out of ignorance and is characterized by suffering."{{sfn|Chogyam Trungpa|2009|p=137}} Note that Chogyam Trungpa's description includes a reference to the ''bardo'', or intermediate state, that is emphasized in the Tibetan tradition.
* Huston Smith and Philip Novak state: "The Buddha taught that beings, confused as they are by ignorant desires and fears, are caught in a vicious cycle called samsara, freedom from which—nirvana—was the highest human end."{{sfn|Smith|Novak|2009|loc=Kindle Location 2574}}}} Samsara continues until moksha is attained by means of insight and [[Nirvana (Buddhism)|nirvana]].,{{sfn|Keown|2000|loc=Kindle locations 702-706}}{{refn|group=note|name=nirvanakc|Ending samsara:
* Kevin Trainor: "Buddhist doctrine holds that until they realize nirvana, beings are bound to undergo rebirth and redeath due to their having acted out of ignorance and desire, thereby producing the seeds of karma".{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=62–63}}
* Conze: "Nirvana is the ''raison d’être'' of Buddhism, and its ultimate justification."{{sfn|Conze|2013|p=71}}}} the "blowing out" of the desires and the gaining of true insight into [[anicca|impermanence]] and [[anatta|non-self]] reality.{{sfn|Buswell|Gimello|1992|p=7–8, 83–84}}{{sfn|Choong|1999|p=28–29, Quote: "Seeing (''passati'') the nature of things as impermanent leads to the removal of the view of self, and so to the realisation of nirvana."}}{{sfn|Rahula|2014|p=51-58}} Samsara and the notion of cyclic existence dates back to 800 BCE.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Oxford Dictionary of Buddhism|last=Keown|first=Damien|publisher=Oxford University Press, Incorporated|year=2003|isbn=9780198605607|pages=248|quote=The word samsara does not appear in the *Vedas, but the notion of cyclic birth and death is an ancient one and dates to around 800 BCE.}}</ref>
Line 58 ⟶ 61:
The six realms are typically divided into three higher realms (good, fortunate) and three lower realms (evil, unfortunate).{{sfn|McClelland|2010|pp=40, 107}}<ref>{{cite book |author1=Bryan J. Cuevas |author2=Jacqueline Ilyse Stone |title=The Buddhist Dead: Practices, Discourses, Representations |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=o1dkea_IgJUC |year=2007 |publisher=University of Hawaii Press |isbn=978-0-8248-3031-1 |pages=118–119 |access-date=2016-09-25 |archive-date=2017-03-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170323185924/https://books.google.com/books?id=o1dkea_IgJUC |url-status=live }}</ref> The three higher realms are the realms of the gods, humans and demi-gods; the three lower realms are the realms of the animals, hungry ghosts and hell beings.{{sfn|Dalai Lama|1992|pp=5-8}}{{sfn|Patrul Rinpoche|1998|pp=61-99}} The six realms are organized into thirty one levels in east Asian literature.{{Sfn|Keown|2013|pp=35-40}} Buddhist texts describe these realms as follows:{{sfn|Dalai Lama|1992|pp=5-8}}{{sfn|Patrul Rinpoche|1998|pp=61-99}}
 
There are six Enlightened Buddhas that exist in each of the six realms. These six Buddhas have also been known as the "Six Sages." Their names are Indrasakra (Buddha in the god realm), Vemacitra (Buddha of the petty god realm), Sakyamuni (Buddha in the human realm); Sthirasimha (Buddha in the animal realm), Jvalamukha (Buddha in the hungry ghost realm), and Yama Dharmaraja (Buddha in the hot hell realm).<ref>{{Cite book|last=Padmasambhava|title=The Tibetan Book of the Dead|publisher=Penguin Books|year=2005|isbn=978-0-14-310494-0|location=United States of America|pages=511}}</ref>
 
* '''Gods realm:'''{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=62}} the gods ([[Deva (Buddhism)|deva]]s){{sfn|McClelland|2010|p=136}} is the most pleasure-filled among the six realms, and typically subdivided into twenty six sub-realms (Catummaharajika, Tavatimsa, Yama, Tusita, Nimmaranati, Paranimmarati Vasavatti).{{Sfn|Keown|2013|p=35}} A rebirth in this heavenly realm is believed to be from very good karma accumulation.{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=62}} A ''Deva'' does not need to work, and is able to enjoy in the heavenly realm all pleasures found on earth. However, the pleasures of this realm lead to attachment (''[[Upādāna]]''), lack of spiritual pursuits and therefore no nirvana.{{Sfn|Keown|2013|p=37}} The vast majority of Buddhist lay people, states Kevin Trainor, have historically pursued Buddhist rituals and practices motivated with rebirth into Deva realm.{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=62}}{{Refn|group=note|Other scholars<ref>{{cite book |author=Merv Fowler |title=Buddhism: Beliefs and Practices |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=A7UKjtA0QDwC |year=1999 |publisher=Sussex Academic Press |isbn=978-1-898723-66-0 |page=65 |access-date=2016-09-25 |archive-date=2016-11-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161121014528/https://books.google.com/books?id=A7UKjtA0QDwC |url-status=live }}, '''Quote:''' "For a vast majority of Buddhists in Theravadin countries, however, the order of monks is seen by lay Buddhists as a means of gaining the most merit in the hope of accumulating good karma for a better rebirth."</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Christopher Gowans|title=Philosophy of the Buddha: An Introduction|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EbU4Hd5lro0C|year=2004|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-134-46973-4|page=169|access-date=2016-09-25|archive-date=2016-08-31|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160831073000/https://books.google.com/books?id=EbU4Hd5lro0C|url-status=live}}</ref> note that better rebirth, not nirvana, has been the primary focus of a vast majority of lay Buddhists. This they attempt through merit accumulation and good ''karma''.}} The ''Deva'' realm in Buddhist practice in southeast and east Asia, states Keown, include gods found in Hindu traditions such as [[Indra]] and [[Brahma]], and concepts in Hindu cosmology such as Mount Meru.{{Sfn|Keown|2013|pp=37-38}}
* '''Human realm:'''{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=62}} called the ''[[Human beings in Buddhism|manuṣya]]'' realm.{{sfn|McClelland|2010|p=136}} Buddhism asserts that one is reborn in this realm with vastly different physical endowments and moral natures because of a being's past karma.{{citation needed|date=September 2020}} A rebirth in this realm is considered as fortunate because it offers an opportunity to attain nirvana and end the Saṃsāra cycle.{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=62}}{{Sfn|Keown|2013|pp=36-37}}
*'''Demi-god realm (Asura):'''{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=62}} the demi-gods ([[Asura (Buddhism)|asura]]s){{sfn|McClelland|2010|p=136}} is the third realm of existence in Buddhism. ''Asura'' are notable for their anger and some supernatural powers. They fight with the ''Devas'' (gods), or trouble the ''Manusya'' (humans) through illnesses and natural disasters.{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=62}} They accumulate karma, and are reborn. Demi-god is sometimes ranked as one of the evil realms as there are stories of them fighting against the Gods.
* '''Animal realm:'''{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=63}} is the state of existence of a being as an animal ([[Animals in Buddhism|tiryag]]).{{sfn|McClelland|2010|p=136}} This realm is traditionally thought to be similar to a hellish realm, because animals are believed in Buddhist texts to be driven by impulse and instinct, they prey on each other and suffer.{{Sfn|Keown|2013|p=36}} Some Buddhist texts assert that plants belong to this realm, with primitive consciousness.{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=63}}
[[File:Hungry Ghosts Scroll Kyoto 5.jpg|thumb|Hungry Ghosts realm of Buddhist samsara, a 12th-century painting from Kyoto, Japan]]
* '''Hungry ghost realm:'''{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=62}} hungry ghosts and other restless spirits ([[preta]]){{sfn|McClelland|2010|p=136}} are rebirths caused by karma of excessive craving and attachments. They do not have a body, are invisible and constitute only "subtle matter" of a being. Buddhist texts describe them as beings who are extremely thirsty and hungry, with very small mouths but very large stomachs.{{Sfn|Keown|2013|p=36}} Buddhist traditions in Asia attempt to care for them on ritual-days every year, by leaving food and drinks in the open, to feed any hungry ghosts nearby.{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=62}} When their bad karma demerit runs out, these beings are reborn into another realm. According to McClelland, this realm is the mildest of the three evil realms.{{sfn|McClelland|2010|p=114, 199}} According to Yangsi Rinpoche, in contrast, the suffering of the beings born in the realm of the hungry ghosts is far more intense than those born in the animal realm.<ref>{{cite book|author=Yangsi Rinpoche|title=Practicing the Path: A Commentary on the Lamrim Chenmo|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wjM6AwAAQBAJ|year=2012|publisher=Wisdom Publications|isbn=978-0-86171-747-7|page=122|access-date=2017-05-02|archive-date=2020-01-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200110023935/https://books.google.com/books?id=wjM6AwAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}</ref>
* '''Hell realm:'''{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=63}} beings in hell ([[Naraka (Buddhism)|naraka]]){{sfn|McClelland|2010|p=136}} enter this realm for evil karma such as theft, lying, adultery and others. The texts vary in their details, but typically describe numerous hellish regions each with different forms of intense suffering, such as eight extremely hot hellish realms, eight extremely cold, being partially eaten alive, beating and other forms of torture in proportion to the evil karma accumulated.{{sfn|Trainor|2004|p=62}} These beings are reborn in another realm after their evil karma has run its course, they die, and they get another chance.{{Sfn|Keown|2013|p=36}} This realm is not similar to afterlife hell in Christianity, states Damien Keown, because in Buddhism there is no realm of final damnation and existence in this realm is also a temporary state.{{Sfn|Keown|2013|p=36}}
Line 85 ⟶ 88:
 
===Craving and ignorance===
Inconsistencies in the oldest texts show that the Buddhist teachings on craving and ignorance, and the means to attain liberation, evolved, either during the lifetime of the Buddha, or thereafter.{{refn|See:<br>* Erich Frauwallner (1953), ''Geschichte der indischen Philosophie'', Band ''Der Buddha und der Jina'' (pp. 147-272)<br>* Andre Bareau (1963), ''Recherches sur la biographie du Buddha dans les Sutrapitaka et les Vinayapitaka anciens'', Ecole Francaise d'Extreme-Orient<br>* Schmithausen, ''On some Aspects of Descriptions or Theories of 'Liberating Insight' and 'Enlightenment' in Early Buddhism''<br>* K.R. Norman, [httphttps://wwwweb.archive.org/web/20160309183447/http://ahandfulofleaves.org/documents/Articlesarticles/Thethe%20Four20four%20Noble20noble%20Truths_Norman_PTS_200320truths_norman_pts_2003.pdf ''Four Noble Truths'']<br>* Tilman Vetter, [httphttps://wwwweb.archive.org/web/20150226092253/http://ahandfulofleaves.org/documents/The%20Ideas%20and%20Meditative%20Practices%20of%20Early%20Buddhism_Vetter.pdf ''The Ideas and Meditative Practices of Early Buddhism, by Tilmann Vetter'']<br>* {{harvnb|Gombrich|2006 |loc=chapter four}}<br>* {{harvnb|Bronkhorst|1993 |loc=chapter 7}}<br>* {{harvnb|Anderson|1999}}}} According to Frauwallner, the Buddhist texts show a shift in the explanation of the root cause of samsara.<ref>Erich Frauwallner (1953), ''Geschichte der indischen Philosophie'', Band ''Der Buddha und der Jina'' (pp. 147-272)</ref> Originally craving was considered to be the root cause of samsara,{{refn|group=note|Frauwallner (1953), as referenced by Vetter (1988),{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=xxi}} Flores (2009),{{sfn|Flores|2009|p=63–65}} and Williams, Tribe and Wynne (2012).{{sfn|Williams|Tribe|Wynne|2012|p=33-34}}}} which could be stilled by the practice of ''[[Dhyāna in Buddhism|dhyana]]'', leading to a calm of mind which according to Vetter ''is'' the liberation which is being sought.{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=xxi-xxxvii}}{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1993|p=93-111}}
 
The later Buddhist tradition considers [[Avidyā (Buddhism)|ignorance]] (''avidya'') to be the root cause of samsara.{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=xxi}}{{sfn|Keown|2004|pp=81, 281}}{{sfn|Fowler|1999|p=39–42}} Avidya is misconception and ignorance about reality, leading to grasping and clinging, and repeated rebirth.{{sfn|Edelglass|2009|p=3-4}}{{sfn|Laumakis|2008|p=136}} According to Paul Williams, "it is the not-knowingness of things as they truly are, or of oneself as one really is."{{sfn|Williams|Tribe|Wynne|2012|p=46–47}} It can be overcome by insight into the true nature of reality. In the later Buddhist tradition "liberating insight" came to be regarded as equally liberating as the practice of ''dhyana''.{{sfn|Gombrich|1997|p=99-102}}{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1993|p=93-111}} According to Vetter and Bronkhorst, this happened in response to other religious groups in India, who held that a liberating insight was an indispensable requisite for ''[[moksha]]'', liberation from rebirth.{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=xxxii, xxxiii}}{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1993|p=54-55, 96, 99}}{{refn|group=note|Tillmann Vetter: "Very likely the cause was the growing influence of a non-Buddhist spiritual environment·which claimed that one can be released only by some truth or higher knowledge. In addition, the alternative (and perhaps sometimes competing) method of discriminating insight (fully established after the introduction of the four noble truths) seemed to conform so well to this claim."{{sfn|Vetter|1988|p=xxxiii}}<br><br>According to Bronkhorst, this happened under influence of the "mainstream of meditation," that is, Vedic-Brahmanical oriented groups, which believed that the cessation of action could not be liberating, since action can never be fully stopped. Their solution was to postulate a fundamental difference between the inner soul or self and the body. The inner self is unchangeable, and unaffected by actions. By insight into this difference, one was liberated. To equal this emphasis on insight, Buddhists presented insight into their most essential teaching as equally liberating. What exactly was regarded as the central insight "varied along with what was considered most central to the teaching of the Buddha."{{sfn|Bronkhorst|1993|p=54-55, 96, 99}}}}
Line 106 ⟶ 109:
A value of Buddhism is the idea of [[impermanence]]. All living things, causes, conditions, situations are impermanent.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Oxford Dictionary of Buddhism|last=Keown|first=Damien|publisher=Oxford University Press, Incorporated|year=2003|quote=A fundamental tenet of *Buddhism is that all formations (*samskara)—things that come into being dependent on causes and conditions— are impermanent.}}</ref> Impermanence is the idea that all things disappear once they have originated. According to [[Buddhism]], [[Impermanence]] occurs constantly "moment to moment",<ref>{{Cite book|title=Oxford Dictionary of Buddhism|last=Keown|first=Damien|publisher=Oxford University Press, Incorporated|year=2003|pages=15|quote=Impermanence refers to the arising, passing away, changing, and disappearance of things that have arisen, and according to the *Abhidharma is a process that takes place from moment to moment.}}</ref> and this is why there is no recognition of the self.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Oxford Dictionary of Buddhism|last=Keown|first=Damien|publisher=Oxford University Press, Incorporated|year=2003|pages=15|quote=It is because of the impermanence of the five aggregates (*skandha) that Buddhism teaches there can be no eternal self or soul (see ANATMAN).}}</ref> Since everything is considered to be in a state of decay, permanent happiness and self cannot exist in Samsara.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Oxford Dictionary of Buddhism|last=Keown|first=Damien|publisher=Oxford University Press, Incorporated|year=2003|pages=15|quote=For the same reason it is thought that there can be no permanent happiness in *samsara, because situations constantly change and in time all things decay (see DUHKHA).}}</ref>
 
[[Anatta]] is the Buddhist idea of non-self. Winston L. King, a writer from the University of Hawai'i Press, references two integral parts of Anatta in ''Philosophy East and West.''<ref>{{Cite journal|last=King|first=Winston|date=Summer 1983|title=The Existential Nature of Buddhist Ultimates|journal=Philosophy East and West|volume=33|issue=3|pages=263–271|jstor=1398828|doi=10.2307/1398828}}</ref> King details the first aspect, that [[Anatta]] can be "experienced and not just described."<ref>{{Cite journal|last=King|first=Winston|date=Summer 1983|title=The Existential Nature of Buddhist Ultimates|journal=Philosophy East and West|volume=33|issue=3 |pages=266|doi=10.2307/1398828 |jstor=1398828 |quote=One is that anatta can be experienced, not just described. Indeed all vipassana meditational techniques have as their purpose the production of a visceral, fully existential awareness of one's own body-mind "self" as a set of temporarily associated factors which have no integral unity.}}</ref> King states the second aspect of [[Anatta]] is that it is the liberation from the "power of samsaric drives."<ref>{{Cite journal|last=King|first=Winston|date=Summer 1983|title=The Existential Nature of Buddhist Ultimates|journal=Philosophy East and West|volume=33|issue=3|pages=266|doi=10.2307/1398828 |quote=The second point about anatta is that this experience is also one of release, release from the power of samsaric drives into a new and different self-aware|jstor=1398828}}</ref> Obtaining awareness of [[Anatta]] and non-self reality results in a, "freedom from the push-pull of his own appetites, passions, ambitions, and fixations and from the external world's domination in general, that is, the conquest of greed, hatred, and delusion."<ref>{{Cite journal|last=King|first=Winston|date=Summer 1983|title=The Existential Nature of Buddhist Ultimates|journal=Philosophy East and West|volume=33|issue=3|pages=266|doi=10.2307/1398828 |jstor=1398828}}</ref> This "push-pull" of mundane human existence or samsara results in [[Dukkha|dukka]], but the recognition of [[Anatta]] results in a "freedom from the push-pull."
 
==Psychological interpretation==