[go: nahoru, domu]

Samu (fossil): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Alter: journal, url, title, pmc, pages. URLs might have been anonymized. Add: s2cid, pmid, archive-date, archive-url, authors 1-1. Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. Removed parameters. Formatted dashes. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by DontCallMeLateForDinner | Category:CS1 maint: PMC format | #UCB_Category 3/8
m rv sockpuppet
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Hominin fossil}}
{{coord|47.627|N|18.384|E|display=title}}
{{Infobox fossil|common name=Samu|image=Homo erectus palaeohungaricus.JPG|alt=The bone, situated opposite its life position.|caption=The bone, situated opposite its life position.|species=''[[Homo neanderthalensis]]''?<br />''[[Homo heidelbergensis]]''|place discovered=[[Vértesszőlős|Vértesszőlős Early Man Site]], [[Hungary]]|age=325-340 ka|discovered by=László Vértes and team|date discovered=21 August 1965|catalog number=VSZ I-II}}
 
{{Infobox fossil|common name=Samu|image=Homo erectus palaeohungaricus.JPG|alt=The bone, situated opposite its life position.|caption=The bone, situated opposite its life position.|species=''[[Homo neanderthalensis]]''|place discovered=[[Vértesszőlős|Vértesszőlős Early Man Site]], [[Hungary]]|age=325-340 ka|discovered by=László Vértes and team|date discovered=21 August 1965|catalog number=VSZ I-II}}
 
'''Samu''' ('''VSZ II''') is the nickname given to a fragmentary [[Middle Pleistocene]] human [[occipital bone|occipital]], also known as '''Vertesszolos Man''' or '''Vertesszolos occipital''', discovered in [[Vértesszőlős]], [[Central Transdanubia]], [[Hungary]].
 
Line 9 ⟶ 7:
The find was made on August 21,1965 during a dig led by {{ill|László Vértes|hu|Vértes László}} in the small town of Vértesszőlős, and the fossil was nicknamed '''Sámuel''', because the twenty-first of August is the [[name day]] of [[biblical judge]] [[Samuel]] in Hungarian tradition.<ref>János Ladó, Ágnes Bíró, ''Magyar utónévkönyv'' (2005), p. 109.</ref> Since, the fossil has widely became known as Samu, a short form of the name in Hungary. The site has garnered much scientific interest due to an abundance of [[Fauna|faunal]] remains during [[Quarry|quarrying]].
 
At the same time as the occipital, 'several lower'<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last1=Roksandic |first1=Mirjana |last2=Radović |first2=Predrag |last3=Lindal |first3=Joshua |date=2018 |title=Revising the hypodigm of Homo heidelbergensis: A view from the Eastern Mediterranean |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1040618216309545 |journal=Quaternary International |language=en |volume=466 |pages=66–81 |doi=10.1016/j.quaint.2017.10.013}}</ref> [[Deciduous teeth|milk teeth]] were discovered 8 meters from the [[cranium]], found close in relation to the [[Peking Man|Zhoukoudian hominins]], and catalogued '''VSZ I'''.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last1=Soukup |first1=Václav |last2=Mechurová |first2=Zdenka |date=2018-12-14 |title=Mysterious Prehistoric Samuel: Homo erectus paleohungaricus in the Context of Anthropogenesis |url=https://journals.muni.cz/anthropologia_integra/article/view/11426 |journal=Anthropologia Integra |language=en |volume=9 |issue=2 |pages=7–19 |doi=10.5817/AI2018-2-7 |issn=1804-6665|doi-access=free }}</ref> At first, the remains were believed to be of 500 ka, but recent revisions suggest a younger [[Age of Earth|antiquity]] of 300-250 ka.<ref>Kordos, L., "Revised biostratigraphy of the early man site at Vertesszolos, Hungary", ''Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg'' 171 (a May 1994), 225&#x2013;236225–236.</ref> Additional dating work clarifies an age of 315±72 ka for the fossil, 310±30 ka for the footprint, and 328±28 ka for the oldest human occupation.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Kele |first1=Sándor |last2=Markó |first2=András |last3=Cseh |first3=Julianna |last4=Shen |first4=Chuan-Chou |last5=Wu |first5=Chung-Che |last6=Bernasconi |first6=Stefano M. |date=2015 |title=Dating and clumped isotope-based temperature of a paleo-jacuzzi (Vértesszőlős Early Man site, Hungary) |url=https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=clumped_isotope |journal=Abstract Book of 31st IAS Meeting of Sedimentology |pages=267}}</ref> An alternative dating scheme is 210-185 ka.<ref name=":3" />
 
A replica of the Samu occipital bone is on exhibit in the [[Hungarian National Museum]],<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |date=2009-02-10 |title=Samunak kutya baja - FN.hu |url=http://www.fn.hu/tudomany/20090209/samunak_kutya_baja/ |access-date=2023-08-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090210123748/http://www.fn.hu/tudomany/20090209/samunak_kutya_baja/ |archive-date=2009-02-10 }}</ref> as well as associated tools and fossilized animal footprints.<ref name="Fzy412">{{Cite book |last1=Fozy |first1=István |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DQIjAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA412 |title=Fossils of the Carpathian Region |last2=Szente |first2=István |date=2013-12-18 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0-253-00987-6 |language=en}}</ref> Since discovery, the occipital has drawn great [[Tourism|tourist attraction]] and scientific interest.<ref name=":0" /> "Samu" has become a common name for plastic skeletons shown in [[biology]] classes in Hungarian student slang.<ref>[http://mnytud.arts.unideb.hu/szleng/ronaky/re_tan.htm Hogyan beszél ma az ifjúság?] (paper on student slang)</ref>
Line 25 ⟶ 23:
 
== Description ==
The occipital fragment probably belonged to an adult individual, but it is very thin and flattened at the top-rear. The nuchal hump is very developed and, in life, would have supported very robust neck [[musculature]]. The [[cranial capacity]] was initially estimated to be 1300 cc. The fragment has been distorted during [[fossilization]] within the [[travertine]]. Vértes hypothesized that traces of brain extraction and [[Human cannibalism|cannibalism]] are present on the bone, although this is typically rejected.<ref name=":0" /> Later [[Morphology (biology)|morphological]] analysis by Roksandic, Radović, and Lindal (2018) clarify that the revised cranial capacity is 'large', but do not list a metric.<ref name=":3" />
 
The [[Nuchal plane|nuchal]] and [[Occipital plane|occipital planes]] have a sharp angle. The [[Occipital bun|occipital torus]] is moderately wide, and a deep [[Sulcus (morphology)|sulcus]] that is somewhat continuous along the [[superior nuchal line]] makes this formation pronounced. A [[Suprainiac fossa|suprainiac]] depression is either not found above it, or, like [[Bilzingsleben (Paleolithic site)|Bilzingsleben]], it is not preserved in the fossil as it sits high and starts with the [[opisthocranion]]. The incipient suprainiac fossa is a derived [[Neanderthal]] trait, but the broad [[Mandible|ramus]] with small distance to the [[Third molar|M3]], thick and angled occipital, high [[inion]], and occipital torus morphology are basal ''[[Homo erectus]]'' traits.<ref name=":3" />
Line 32 ⟶ 30:
The fossil was first described as '''''Homo erectus (seu sapiens) paleohungaricus''''' by Hungarian [[anthropologist]] Andor Thoma in 1996. Thoma was not sure what [[species]] his [[subspecies]] should belong to, ''seu'' being a [[Latin]] term meaning "either" or "or",<ref>{{Citation |title=seu |date=2023-08-10 |url=https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=seu&oldid=75604278 |work=Wiktionary, the free dictionary |access-date=2023-08-17 |language=en}}</ref> suggesting that either '''''H. sapiens paleohungaricus''''' or '''''H. erectus paleohungaricus''''' may be potentially valid as a late specimen of ''H. erectus'' or an early ''[[Human|H. sapiens]]''. Because the fossil is very fragmentary, the [[Taxonomy (biology)|classification]] of the find has since been controversial. Vértes suggested that it was a ''Homo erectus'', as did [[Phillip Tobias]]. However, Tobias disagreed in the estimated cranial volume of 1300 cc. Of the many scientists who examined Samu, Wolpoff concluded that the bone was relatively [[Diagnosis (taxonomy)|nondiagnostic]] in that it could not be conclusively generalized from its preservation and [[Taphonomy|taphonomic]] damage.<ref name=":0" />
 
Others remained divided by the apparently large volume and Neanderthal-like traits (which drew criticism, as the nuchal region of Samu is unlike Neanderthals). [[Chris Stringer|Stringer]] first classified the fragment as a late-surviving [[Accretion model of Neanderthal origins|preneanderthal]], a term that describes specimens typically assigned to ''[[Homo heidelbergensis]]'' with Neanderthal affinities. Others such as Adams (1999) suggest that the [[population]] is transitional of ''Homo erectus'' and ''Homo sapiens''.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal |last=Adams |first=Brian |date=1999 |title=Lower, Middle or Upper Palaeolithic? A Classification Analysis of the Bársony House Hand Axes from the North Carpathian Basin |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01977261.1999.11720942 |journal=Lithic Technology |language=en |volume=24 |issue=1 |pages=7–26 |doi=10.1080/01977261.1999.11720942 |issn=0197-7261}}</ref> Later discoveries, such as the [[Petralona skull]], compare well in the occipital wall and Soukup and Mechurová (2018) support assignment to ''Homo heidelbergensis''.<ref name=":0" />
 
Roksandic, Radović, and Lindal (2018) suggest that the specimen is alike to [[Castel di Guido]], [[Tautavel Man|Arago]], Bilzingsleben, and Petralona in the suite of [[Basal (phylogenetics)|basal]] ''Homo erectus'' traits with few [[Derived (phylogenetics)|derived]] Neanderthal traits. They raise the possibility that a restricted ''Homo heidelbergensis'' definition might include this specimen, and definitely includes [[Mauer 1|Mauer]], [[Ceprano Man|Ceprano]], [[Visogliano]], [[Mala Balanica|Balanica]], [[HaZore'a|Hazorea]], and [[Nadaouiyeh Aïn Askar]] as a group close to the human-Neanderthal split.<ref name=":3" /> However, they did not include the specimen in their ''[[Homo bodoensis]]'' like they did with many of the other specimens mentioned in their 2018 study,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Roksandic |first1=Mirjana |last2=Radović |first2=Predrag |last3=Wu |first3=Xiu‐JieXiu-Jie |last4=Bae |first4=Christopher J. |date=2022 |title=Resolving the "muddle in the middle": The case for Homo bodoensis sp. nov. |journal=Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews |language=en |volume=31 |issue=1 |pages=20–29 |doi=10.1002/evan.21929 |issn=1060-1538 |pmc=9297855 |pmid=34710249}}</ref> a taxon which is considered a [[junior synonym]] of ''[[Homo rhodesiensis]]''.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Delson |first1=Eric |last2=Stringer |first2=Chris |date=2022 |title=The naming of Homo bodoensis by Roksandic and colleagues does not resolve issues surrounding Middle Pleistocene human evolution |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/evan.21950 |journal=Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews |language=en |volume=31 |issue=5 |pages=233–236 |doi=10.1002/evan.21950 |pmid=35758557 |s2cid=250070886 |issn=1060-1538|url=https://academicworks.cuny.edu/context/le_pubs/article/1437/viewcontent/The_naming_of_Homo_bodoensis_by_Roksandic_and_colleagues_does_not_resolve__Delson___Stringer.pdf }}</ref> Other recent classifications suggest they were 'archaic' Neanderthals.<ref name=":4">{{Cite journal |last=Trájer |first=Attila J. |date=2023-06-15 |title=Ecological evaluation of the development of Neanderthal niche exploitation |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277379123001750 |journal=Quaternary Science Reviews |volume=310 |pages=108127 |doi=10.1016/j.quascirev.2023.108127 |s2cid=258795364 |issn=0277-3791|doi-access=free }}</ref> A paper submitted to a conference uses '''''Homo erectus hungaricus''''' as an alternate name.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Naddeo |first=Michelangelo |date=2023 |title=Az ősi magyar jelképrendszer keresése |url=https://epa.oszk.hu/01400/01445/00066/pdf/EPA01445_acta_hungarica_2023_1_0460-0492.pdf |journal=Acta Historica Hungaricus |volume=38}}</ref>
 
== Technology ==
Line 44 ⟶ 42:
 
== Paleoecology ==
[[File:Ősembertelep Vértesszőlős 01.jpg|thumb|Sign at the archeological site denoting the finding of the occipital.|252x252px]]The town of Vértesszőlős is located in the northern section of the [[Pannonian Plain|Pannonian Plains]] of the [[Gerecse Mountains]] foothills. The fossil itself was exhumed from the [[Által-ér]], a river that stretches 51 km and comprisesconsists of 4-5 travertine terraces made of calcite. The fossils found by the river are very well preserved. Human occupation at the site exists in two settlements aged 400-200 ka (during the [[Mindel glaciation]]; the second [[ice age]]). During this time, the climate was milder and warmer, and in January temperatures probably did on, on average, extend under 37.4&nbsp;°F (3&nbsp;°C). Human fossils and culture can be found in several layers of sediment, such as cut animal bones and even a human footprint.<ref name=":0" /> The hominins lived in an area that was mid-mountainous at the western foot of a mountain with open calcareous tuff or freshwater limestone pools<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Dobosi |first=Viola T. |date=2011 |title=Obsidian use in the Palaeolithic in Hungary and adjoining areas |url=https://www.meiji.ac.jp/cols/english/research/6t5h7p00000de6rx-att/06.pdf |journal=Natural Resource Environment and Humans |volume=1 |pages=83–95}}</ref> on the verge of what once was a [[thermal lake]], which is consistent with other Neanderthal populations{{ref|a|a}}. The site was once a dense [[Temperate forest|temperate]] seasonal forest. Rhinoceros like ''[[Stephanorhinus etruscus]]'' were also contemporaries with aurochs, bison, deer, wolves, and roe.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":4" />
 
== Notes ==
Line 54 ⟶ 52:
[[Category:Fossils of Hungary]]
[[Category:Tourist attractions in Komárom-Esztergom County]]
[[Category:Paleolithic site in Vértesszőlős]]