[go: nahoru, domu]

Siteswap: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Bluelink 1 book for verifiability (prndis)) #IABot (v2.0.1) (GreenC bot
Line 188:
There are other methods of determining a sequence's validity based on the flavor of siteswap.
 
A '''vanilla''' siteswap sequence <math>a_0a_1a_2...a_{n-1}</math>where <math>n</math> is the period of the siteswap, is valid when the [[cardinality]] of the set <math>S</math> (written in [[Set-builder notation]]) is equal to the period <math>n</math> where<math display="block">S=\{(a_i+i)\bmod n | 0\leq i\leq n-1\}</math>To find if a pattern is valid, first create a new sequence formed by adding <math>0</math> to the first number, <math>1</math> to the second number, <math>2</math> to the secondthird number and so on. Second, calculate the modulus (remainder) of each number with the period. If none of the numbers are duplicated in this final sequence, then the pattern is valid.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://www.qedcat.com/articles/juggling_survey.pdf|title=The Mathematics of Juggling|last=Polster|first=Burkard|date=|website=qedcat.com|url-status=live|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=April 22, 2020}}</ref>
 
For example, the pattern 531 would produce <math>5+0,3+1,1+2 </math> or <math>5,4,3</math>. Since the pattern 531 has a period of 3, The results from the previous example would produce <math>5\bmod 3,4\bmod 3,3\bmod 3</math>or <math>2,1,0</math>. In this case, 531 is valid since the numbers <math>2,1,0</math> are all unique. Another example, 513 is an invalid pattern because the first step produces <math>5+0,1+1,3+2 </math> or <math>5,2,5</math>, the second step produces <math>5\bmod 3,2\bmod 3,5\bmod 3</math> or <math>2,2,2</math>, and the final sequence contains at least a duplicate of one number, in this case a 2.