[go: nahoru, domu]

Robinson v. California: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Reverted 1 edit by 104.56.184.218 (talk): Misplaced word. (TW)
fixed grammar
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 27:
|JoinDissent2=
|NotParticipating=Frankfurter
|LawsApplied=[[Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution|U.S. Const. amendamends. VIII]], [[Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution|XIV]]
}}
'''''Robinson v. California''''', 370 U.S. 660 (1962),{{ref|citation}} is the first decision of the [[Supreme Court of the United States|United States Supreme Court]] in which the [[Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Eighth Amendment]] of the Constitution was interpreted to prohibit criminalization of particular acts or conduct, as contrasted with prohibiting the use of a particular form of punishment for a crime. In ''Robinson'', the Court struck down a California law that criminalized being addicted to [[narcotics]].<ref>''Robinson'', 370 U.S. at 667 ("We hold that a state law which imprisons a person thus afflicted as a criminal, even though he has never touched any narcotic drug within the State or been guilty of any irregular behavior there, inflicts a cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the 4th Amendment.").</ref>