Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
BilledMammal (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 544:
*:::What "refutation"?
*:::Also, obviously all the things you are saying are simply not how closing discussions works. The closer can evaluate the arguments but they are under no obligation to pretend that an argument that you happened to find particularly convincing was objectively strong. [[User:LokiTheLiar|Loki]] ([[User talk:LokiTheLiar|talk]]) 19:25, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
*::::Closers are expected to determine consensus based on {{tq|the quality of the arguments given on the various sides of an issue, as viewed through the lens of Wikipedia policy.}}
*::::In this context, a good close will need to give little to no weight to !votes that argued the Telegraph endorsed the [[litter boxes in school hoax]] (as this was disproved by the articles provided in support of it, and thus is not a quality argument), and little to no weight to !votes that argued that it should be considered unreliable on grounds of bias (as this is contradicted by policy). [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 19:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
===Discussion===
| |||