Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Woe Betides: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→The Woe Betides: keep |
TheGrappler (talk | contribs) depth of coverage? |
||
Line 8:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England|list of England-related deletion discussions]]. <span style='font:1em"Avenir";background:#CCF;padding:2px 4px'>[[User:Czar|<font color="#B048B5">''czar''</font>]] [[User_talk:Czar|<font color="#888">·</font>]] [[Special:Contribs/Czar|<font color="#888">·</font>]]</span> 23:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep'''. The coverage from ''NME'', ''Artrocker'', ''CLASH'', and Allmusic is sufficient to demonstrate notability. --[[User:Michig|Michig]] ([[User talk:Michig|talk]]) 06:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
**Is there sufficient ''depth'' of coverage? [http://www.myspace.com/thewoebetides/photos/13640075 This NME mention is very small] as is [http://www.myspace.com/thewoebetides/photos/18508597 this coverage in Artrocker]. I was not sure whether this verged on trivial coverage. The scale of the EP release (100 copies) also seems quite limited. On the other hand Allmusic has more depth. [[User:TheGrappler|TheGrappler]] ([[User talk:TheGrappler|talk]]) 11:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
| |||