|
== [[Talk:Allegations_of_genocide_in_the_2023_Israeli_attack_on_Gaza#Three_options]] ==
I had intended to close this RfC, asking for help, but might be best if ansomeone adminelse diddoes the actual closure, for several reasons including thatas I'm about to be muchcurrently less available, or someone else. SuggestedDraft closure which others can draw from, grateful for constructive criticism:
"The result of the move request was '''consensus against''' current title. Recommend move to [[Gaza genocide question]], and then the closer recommends a new, simpler RFC on a move to [[Gaza genocide]], focused on [[wp:at]].
A key policy is [[WP:AT]], which has commonname and [[WP:POVNAME]]. Npov is also core. There wasis consensus the current title, [[Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza]], is out of date and too long. 3 main options were proposed to replace it: Option 1: Gaza genocide question, Option 2: Gaza genocide accusation, Option 3: Gaza genocide. [[WP:ACD]] advice on splitting is relevant. There was consensus Options 1 and 2 wereare similar. Option 3 had the highest level of support and opposition. Option 1 had the second most support. Supporters statedfor thereOption are3 manystated most reliable references forsupport concisely naming the events asarticle Gaza genocide, per commonname. Opposers questioned the neutrality of option 3, said it was not neutral and noted the case at ICJ was still in progress. Some put forward arguments based on their perceptions, instead of what sources and the policies say. The relevant policies include [[WP:AT]], which has [[WP:POVNAME]]. As there is unanimity the current title is out of date and too long, a way forward wouldmight be to move nowthe toarticle Option 1 (or 2); Option 1 appearednow to be many people's second choice outOption of the 3,1 seeper splitting in [[WP:ACD]]. Option 2 is the most similar to the current title. Then a simplified RfC cancould be opened on whether the article should be further moved to [[Gaza genocide]]. This could restate but also develop arguments on commonname, weighting of legal sources, icj including timing of icj decisions, doubt, neutrality."
Hopefully a lot of this is useful,Redrafted [[User:Tpbradbury|Tom B]] ([[User talk:Tpbradbury|talk]]) 0703:0212, 291 JuneJuly 2024 (UTC)
|