[go: nahoru, domu]

Wikipedia:Editing policy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎lead: replace "delete" with "remove" and remove WP:Deletion policy link per WT:Editing policy#Content removal versus page deletion
m ce links
Tag: Reverted
Line 1:
{{redirects here|Wikipedia:Editing guidelines|editing guidelines that are not part of this policy|Wikipedia:List of guidelines#Editing}}
{{redirects here|WPWikipedia:Editing|basic information about how to edit Wikipedia|Help:Editing}}
{{redirects here|WP:EP|the education program|Wikipedia:Education program|extended confirmed protection|WP:ECP}}
 
Line 8:
{{policy in a nutshell|Improve pages wherever you can, and do not worry about leaving them imperfect. Preserve the value that others add, even if they "did it wrong" (try to fix it rather than remove it).}}
{{Conduct policy list}}
[[Wikipedia:About|Wikipedia]] is the product of millions of '''[[WP:Wikipedians|editors' contributions]]''', each one bringing something different to the table, whether it be: researching skills, technical expertise, writing prowess or tidbits of information, but most importantly, a willingness to help. Even the [[Wikipedia:Featured articles|best]] articles]] should not be considered complete, as each new editor can offer new insights on how to enhance and improve the content in it at any time.
 
==Adding information to Wikipedia==
Wikipedia ''[[WP:NOTEVERYTHING|summarizes]]'' accepted knowledge. As a rule, the more accepted knowledge it can encapsulate, the better it is. Please [[WP:BOLDBe bold|boldly]] add content summarizing accepted knowledge, and be particularly cautious about removing [[WP:RS|sourced]] content. It is Wikipedia policy that information in Wikipedia should be [[WP:VVerifiability|verifiable]] and must not be [[WP:NORNo original research|not be original research]]. Show that content is verifiable by referencing [[WP:reliable sources|reliable sources]]. Because a lack of content is better than misleading or false content, unsourced content may be challenged and [[WP:BURDEN|removed]]. To avoid such challenges, the best practice is to provide an "[[WP:ICinline citation|inline citation]]" when adding content (see: [[WP:Citing sources]] for instructions on how to do this, or ask for help on the article talk page).
 
Wikipedia respects others' copyright. Although content must be backed by reliable sources, [[WP:COPYPASTECopying text from other sources|avoid copying]] or [[WP:PARAPHRASEClose paraphrasing|closely paraphrasing]] a copyrighted source. You should read the source, understand it, and then express what it says in your own words. An exception exists for the often necessary use of short quotations; they must be enclosed in quotations marks, accompanied by an inline reference to the source, and usually attributed to the author. (See the [[Fair use]] doctrine which allows limited quoting without permission.)
 
Another way you can improve an article is by finding a source for existing unsourced content. This is especially true if you come across statements that are potentially controversial. You do not need to be the person who added the content to add a source and citation for it.