[go: nahoru, domu]

Wikipedia:Editing policy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎Be cautious with major changes: discuss: remove odd, slightly melodramatic-sounding use of; adding what is hopefully a sentence or so of archetype to illustrate the dynamics that result from an editor neglecting to communicate
→‎Be cautious with major changes: discuss: Copy edit. Two substantive changes: (1) remove "a major change requiring prior discussion" (discussion is wise, but not required, before major changes), (2) encourage explanations for "any" - not just major - changes, and (3) add an edit summary as an alternative option for explaining a major edit
Line 84:
===Be cautious with major changes: discuss===
{{policy shortcut|WP:CAUTIOUS}}
''Be cautious about making a major change to an article.'' Prevent [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]] by discussing such edits first on the [[Help:Talk pages|article's talk page]]. An edit that one mighteditor characterizethinks asis peripheralminor or clearly warranted might be seen as a major changeor requiring prior discussionunwarranted by others; an editor with a habit of carefully considered, incontrovertible improvements that regardless lack explanation may soon find that their reasoning isn't always as clear to their peers as they had previously assumed. If you choose to [[WP:be bold|be bold]], tryprovide tothe justifyrationale yourfor any change in detailthe edit summary or on the article talk page,. soIf asyour tochange avoidis anlengthy editor war. Before making a major changecomplex, consider first creating a new draft on a [[Wikipedia:User_pages#SUB|subpage of your own user page]] and thenstart a discussion that includes a link to it on the article's talk page so as to facilitate a new discussion.
 
===But – Wikipedia is not a discussion forum===