Wikipedia:Reference desk/Refdesk reform RFC: Difference between revisions

#'''Strong Support''' When I first came to this RFC, I was for Option 1, but after reading this entire page, I'm strongly supporting keeping things the same. The reference desk certainly has its issues, but as others have pointed out it is a good resource, does provide value to the encyclopedia and our readers, and generally does an alright job at what it purposes to do. Certainly it has issues, but these can be fixed by a manner of gradual policy and culture changes rather than large scale reform. I strongly oppose option 2. [[User:Zellfaze|Zell Faze]] ([[User talk:Zellfaze|talk]]) 00:09, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

#'''Support'''. It hits the occasional pothole on the road to enlightenment, but keeps chugging along. Objectionable questions can be ignored. [[User:Clarityfiend|Clarityfiend]] ([[User talk:Clarityfiend|talk]]) 00:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

 

====Discussion of option four====