Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Alleichem: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 100:
I can’t believe some of the accusations here, but I’m not going to write an essay. They’re playing Mr. and Mrs. innocent, but I’d appreciate if the [[admin ]] would simply go to the [[Yahweh]] page and see exactly what these people are complaining about. You’ll find a strange difference. I’m hardly doing any editing on the page, in fact, I’m probably doing the least edits. Really strange. And another thing. I;d appreciate if the admin could answer the question, if someone adds good evidence to a page with citations and proof, should it be disregarded: then why do I get this?: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yahweh&diff=240905741&oldid=240868599 Why is it tht in the Relevance in the New Testament section, no mention is made of the fact that many scholars beleive that the NT has hebrew or Aramaic originals? See, something is clearly wrong. It's not a mainstream view that's been presented, and it's certainly biased.
*''Sky and Lisa have been accused of edit wars in their time also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:LisaLiel
*''Also, it might be worth looking at the talk page. N one has replied to my messages nearly 8 hours later, and then wonder why I put up evidencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Yahweh. Sky has one quote from a book which claims that the New Testament was originally written in Greek and therefore beleives it was! The original manuscripts have persihed and therefore, it isn't known whether thenew Testament was written in Greek or not, but scholars tend to lean towards the latter alternative.'' [[User:Alleichem|Alleichem]]'' ([[User talk:Alleichem|talk]]) 16:02, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Users who endorse this summary:
# [[User:Alleichem|Alleichem]]
| |||