Wikipedia:Teahouse: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Usedtobecool (talk | contribs) →Approached by a company offering free consultancy for Wikipedia articles: @Ccyfferent "undisclosed paid editing is prohibited. ..." [Factotum] |
→Improving a city: new section |
||
Line 1,347:
::Actually, ignore my above statement, CMD's advice is probably better for you. [[User:MemeGod27|Sir MemeGod ._.]] <small>([[User talk:Sir MemeGod|talk]] - [[Special:Contribs/Sir MemeGod|contribs]] - [[User:Sir MemeGod/Creations|created articles]])</small> 04:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
:[[User:Ccyfferent|Ccyfferent]], undisclosed paid editing is prohibited. Disclosed paid editing is allowed, however very few of us actually think it's a good thing, it is mostly just tolerated, begrudgingly. Any paid advocate would still be editing for their client as an individual editor, and would have to abide by all the rules same as everyone else, plus a few more:<ol><li>They need to disclose their client and employer.</li><li>They may only submit drafts and make edit requests on the talk page of articles. Direct editing of articles would be limited to fixing typos and vandalisms.</li><li>Incompetence and time-wasting is tolerated less. They may not, for example, keep rehashing the same issues, keep posting walls of text and demand that volunteers review their proposals on their schedule.</li></ol>If you do hire a paid editor and their conduct is poor, it will forever tarnish the reputation among Wikipedia editors of whichever topic they happen to be working for. If the topic is of wider interest, the misconduct is often even picked up by the media. The subject will invite closer scrutiny in the future. For example, a new article on a borderline notable topic is much more likely to be tolerated or not urgently sought deletion of, if created by an independent volunteer with some track record, than if it has prior history of having been pushed by paid editors or single purpose accounts with apparent conflicts of interest.<br style="margin-bottom:0.5em"/>Generally, I would advise that you refrain from hiring a paid service to write for you unless you are okay with losing your money and getting no results, with some likelihood of it getting back to you and tarnishing your reputation in real life. That is the most common outcome.<br style="margin-bottom:0.5em"/>Regards!<span id="Usedtobecool:1721622868391:WikipediaFTTCLNTeahouse" class="FTTCmt"> — '''[[User:Usedtobecool|Usedtobecool]]''' [[User talk:Usedtobecool|☎️]] 04:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)</span>
== Improving a city ==
What's a good example of a good or featured article about an American city? I want to use it as a guide to help me improve a city's article. [[User:TrademarkedTWOrantula|<span style="color: darkgreen"><span style="font-family: Georgia">TWOrantula</span></span>]]<sup><small>TM</small></sup> <small>([[User talk:TrademarkedTWOrantula|enter the web]])</small> 05:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
|