Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fram/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Taking over the desysop decision: Need hounding finding of fact |
|||
Line 38:
===Need Finding of Fact Re: Hounding===
The proposed decision states principles about Hounding / Harassment. Without a Finding of Fact, the implication was that Arbcom feels that Fram has hounded somebody (who I will not name.) The evidence does not support that and I would ask Arbcom to make an express finding on the point:
::Fram had a series of interaction with a user making problematic edits. When Fram could not resolve the problem with the user, he correctly brought it to the attention of a larger group via WP:AN and WP:ANI. Later, this user complained to T&S claiming that Fram had harrassed or hounded the user, and T&S asked Fram to cease interacting with the user without imposing a formal interaction ban between the two in April 2018, and a reminder of that warning in March 2019. The user
A good argument can be made that the user waived confidentiality by posting the warning box, but I am willing to settle for leaving the user unnamed. However, this case started out as a harassment/hounding case against an editor, and Fram deserved a finding of fact clearing him of those charges. Many thanks, [[User:Hlevy2|Hlevy2]] ([[User talk:Hlevy2|talk]]) 20:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
| |||