Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Sdkb: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Sideswipe9th (talk | contribs) |
→Discussion of {{u|Homeostasis07}}'s Oppose: the others were theleekycauldron in August of last year and The Night Watch earlier this month. There might be more but I only know of these two |
||
Line 30:
#::I have restored the vote - this action is out of process. It is one oppose and we should all leave it be unless the voter changes their mind. [[User:Lightburst|Lightburst]] ([[User talk:Lightburst|talk]]) 03:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
#:::{{re|Lightburst}} I'm going to have to urge you to self-revert here. Per the [[Wikipedia:2015_administrator_election_reform/Phase_II/Clerking_RfC|2015 RfA reforms process]] crats are empowered to make clerking actions such as this. It is not considered out of process. [[User:Sideswipe9th|Sideswipe9th]] ([[User talk:Sideswipe9th|talk]]) 03:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
#:::This is at least the third RFA where Lightburst has issued this exact threat: [[WP:POINT|if they don't get their way, they'll vote to oppose]]. Since the strike and redaction by [[User:AmandaNP]] were made as a bureaucrat action, this is a good test case: the 'crats' reaction to this will show if they can be trusted to clerk RFAs and prevent this sort of disruption. <b style="font-family: Segoe Script;">''[[User:City of Silver|<span style="color:#BC49A6">City</span>]][[User talk:City of Silver|<span style="color:Green"> o</span><span style="color:Red">f </span>]][[Special:Contribs/City of Silver|<span style="color:#708090">Silver</span>]]''</b> 03:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
| |||