Content deleted Content added
BilledMammal (talk | contribs) |
BilledMammal (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 90:
*:What is inaccurate about "attack"? Airstrikes is [[WP:OVERPRECISE]] that can easily become inaccurate if it is later shown that any ground (or naval) units were involved. "attack" is [[WP:CONSISTENT]] with [[World Central Kitchen aid convoy attack]], [[9 July 2024 Gaza attacks]] etc. Please also see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Al-Sardi_school_attack#Requested_move_11_June_2024 this RM closure] that favored "attack" over "airstrike".'''[[User talk:Vice regent|VR]]''' <sub>(Please [[Template:Ping|ping]] on reply)</sub> 19:39, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
*::"Attack" is ambiguous, and [[WP:COMMONALITY]] would prefer "airstrikes" (or "strikes") over "attack" for airstrikes - while there are exceptions, they aren't common.
*::"Al-Mawasi strikes" would address your concerns about it
:'''Strong support''' given that the Israeli POV would limit the article's scope to the assassination attempt, while the Palestinian POV would enable the article to deal with both the assassination and the murder of civilians in the scope; we don't need two articles for this single incident. [[User:Makeandtoss|Makeandtoss]] ([[User talk:Makeandtoss|talk]]) 19:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
|