Content deleted Content added
Line 383:
::::::::::: Actually it's not speculation, I backed it up repeatedly with pageview evidence showing that readership spiked hugely after shooting incidents. I'm not going to rehash that again since you just ignore it and it's not particularly relevant. I've also suggested a compromise above, I'll wait for further comments on that. <small>'''<span style="color:Olive">Waleswatcher</span>''' [[User_talk:Waleswatcher#top|''(<span style="color:green">talk</span>)'']]</small> 14:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
::::::::::::All that proves is that after a mass shooting involving an AR-15 they look up the rifle, not that this why the majority of users come here overall. I bet the mass shooting articles get similar spikes.[[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 14:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
{{Collapse top}}
:::::::It's hardly an aspersion when A) You asked at [[WP:NPOV/N]] recently about deleting all mentions of mass shootings from the page, I can provide the diff if you've forgotten, and B) I didn't even mention you by name. [[User:Simonm223|Simonm223]] ([[User talk:Simonm223|talk]]) 12:53, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
::::::::[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=863248241 Here you go...] Not an aspersion when it's a statement of fact.[[User:Simonm223|Simonm223]] ([[User talk:Simonm223|talk]]) 12:57, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
{{Collapse bottom}}
=== Including Pulse ===
| |||