Revision as of 10:48, 28 July 2015 edit Wegesrand (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,358 edits →‎Woefully limited and perhaps outdated: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:57, 28 July 2015 edit undo NinjaRobotPirate (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators 144,192 edits →‎Woefully limited and perhaps outdated: systemic bias Next edit →
Line 85: This article seems to conceive the subject as limited to conventional Western illusionistic speaking theatre. No epic theatre, no Asian theatre traditions ... The second on "Semiotics of Acting" is either fluff or BS; it's best to throw it out completely until the structure of this article somehow does justice to the broad field of theatre aesthetics. [[User:Wegesrand\|Wegesrand]] ([[User talk:Wegesrand\|talk]]) 10:48, 28 July 2015 (UTC) : Wikipedia has been accused of having a [[WP:BIAS\|systemic bias]]. Frequently, the articles are written from a modern, Western viewpoint, as this reflects the background of the majority of its editors. [[Google Books]] might be a good place to search for sources to expand the article. Beyond that, I'm not exactly sure what to suggest, as I'm not overly well-informed on the topic. [[User:NinjaRobotPirate\|NinjaRobotPirate]] ([[User talk:NinjaRobotPirate\|talk]]) 19:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Acting: Difference between revisions