Content deleted Content added
Southerness (talk | contribs) |
Thundermaker (talk | contribs) →Since when are the 9/11 perpetrators "alleged"?: will delete |
||
Line 68:
I would add that the writer of this article is making an illogical jump by trying to insinuate that Al-Awlaki must not be guilty of crimes he is directly accused of because he was not linked with the 9/11 terrorist incident. The only relevant point about coming up on the radar was that it made Al-Awlaki known to law enforcement. He was not killed because of radar but because of terrorist acts.
[[User:Southerness|Southerness]] ([[User talk:Southerness|talk]]) 01:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Southerness, October 30, 2020
:None of the 9/11 hijackers will ever be convicted, because they are dead and cannot receive a fair trial; so I can see why a cautious writer would say "alleged". But the identities of the hijackers are accepted as fact, and neither the referenced news article nor [[hijackers in the September 11 attacks]] uses "alleged", so I will remove it from this article.
:The interesting part about the law enforcement timeline is that they knew before he left the US that he was encouraging jihad, but they allowed him to leave, which eventually led to putting him on a kill list and drone-striking him without a trial. His father even sued to stop it but was denied standing because kill lists are secret. [[User:Thundermaker|Thundermaker]] ([[User talk:Thundermaker|talk]]) 20:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
| |||