[go: nahoru, domu]

Talk:Deçan: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Deçan: rsp
Line 300:
If that's what the title is going to be, then it should count only for post-2008 events, should it not? [[User:23 editor|23 editor]] ([[User talk:23 editor|talk]]) 19:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
:The renaming was made using invalid incorrect arguments by involved editor, contrary to wikipedia rules so there is no reason to use this name at all.--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 20:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 
My point is if both sides are unwilling to budge, then there really isn't any point to anything. Everyone knows that the Deçan/Dečani debate will produce ridiculously inaccurate articles as to what a place is called (i.e. we wouldn't call the [[Battle of Stalingrad]] the Battle of Volgograd just because the place is ''now'' called Volgograd. It doesn't make sense and isn't historically accurate). But why not reach a compromise? Articles or sections describing pre-2008 events or dates should use Dečani (i.e. Visoki Dečani will not become Visoki Deçan, etc.) I really don't see any other way for editors on both sides to stop wasting their time and nationalizing the argument (Albanian and Serb editors, alike). Thoughts? [[User:23 editor|23 editor]] ([[User talk:23 editor|talk]]) 20:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)