Talk:Fukushima nuclear accident: Difference between revisions

 

:I agree that an entire paragraph about accident tolerant fuel research is too much for this article. Besides, it is written from the point of view of a single country. The paragraph could be deleted, or it could be shortened to a single sentence. For example: "After the accident, a lot of funding was directed to research and development on nuclear safety, such as accident tolerant fuels that could withstand higher temperatures than conventional nuclear fuel." [https://www.neimagazine.com/analysis/the-complexities-of-developing-accident-tolerant-fuel-11577369/] --[[User:TuomoS|TuomoS]] ([[User talk:TuomoS|talk]]) 07:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC)