Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
Line 182:
:::::{{ping|Vanjagenije}} You did not understand me. I am not supporting nor opposing the inclusion of "Albanik". As an administrator, I am concerned about procedure. If there is a discussion, and nobody except you supports the inclusion, then you can't add it. That is against [[WP:consensus]]. Maybe further discussion is needed, maybe wider participation is needed, but at this moment, there is simply no consensus to include. '''[[User:Vanjagenije|<span style="color:#008B8B;">Vanjagenije</span>]] [[User talk:Vanjagenije|<span style="color: #F4A460;">(talk)</span>]]''' 11:37, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
::::::{{re|Vanjagenije}} Do not ping yourself :) The discussions always have their friendly and funny side. On the issue you cite, I suggest adding the name "Albanik", and if in the coming few days opposition arises, I will open a RfC. Good? [[User:Ktrimi991|Ktrimi991]] ([[User talk:Ktrimi991|talk]]) 11:41, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
:::::::{{ping|Vanjagenije}} {{ping|Ktrimi991}} it might make sense to make a "Name" section where we explain how the name Albanik came to be, if we keep it-- if what is said in the above section (admittedly by a sock whose comments must be stricken) is true. --[[User:Calthinus|Calthinus]] ([[User talk:Calthinus|talk]]) 16:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
| |||