Content deleted Content added
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Rocketry}}, {{WikiProject Spaceflight}}, {{WikiProject United States}}. Tag: |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{American English}}
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Rocketry
{{WikiProject Spaceflight
{{WikiProject United States
}}
Line 26:
::{{ping|Rod57}}, yes, thanks. I used that source to update the article yesterday, indicating that NG would not continue the project.
::Now, today, right before I saw the notification of your ping, I made a fairly significant edit to add a paragraph to the history section to 1) address a mention of some things in the lede that were neither cited nor discussed in the article body, and 2) to put the OmegA rocket in it's broader context of a company (under multiple names, unfortunately, due to acquisitions) endeavoring to keet its solid rocket technology in the government-funded orbital space launch "market" for going on 16 years now. If you have a chance, would appreciate you reading it to proofread, and modify or improve. Cheers. [[User:N2e|N2e]] ([[User talk:N2e|talk]]) 18:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
:::{{ping|N2e}}, GEM-63 has long been on the market (no ironic quotes). [[User:Эрнест мл.|Эрнест мл.]] ([[User talk:Эрнест мл.|talk]]) 21:51, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Эрнест мл.}}, oh, no worries, the scare quotes weren't about that aspect. They were just intended to be "market" == "so-called market", simply because the game of competitive contracting for US government space technology, as with most military and defense technology also, is not anythink like an open and competitive private market. That is all that meant.
::::That phenomenon, in government-sponsored and government-funded space launch systems, is not merely an artifact of the US gvmt game, it is pretty much the same globally. No [[nation state]] has historically bought their launch services like they buy there Uber/Lyft services or air travel services: from competitive players in a much more open market. Cheers. [[User:N2e|N2e]] ([[User talk:N2e|talk]]) 03:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
{{outdent}}{{ping|N2e}}, and yet you present very personal views to marginalise ATK. The market to offer services to the state is also a market without quotes. There are also those who do not want any SRB. My gut is keen on confrontation with Marxists, so I think I see your reception very well. It could be in journalism, but it could be superfluous on Wikipedia (my bad English). GEM-63 -- winning business offer. Similar solution is common in the world. [[User:Эрнест мл.|Эрнест мл.]] ([[User talk:Эрнест мл.|talk]]) 10:24, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
== NGIS ==
To clearify my edits:
The Innovation Systems division (NGIS) only existed in the 2nd half of 2018 and in 2019. In January 2020 OmegA became a project of Northrop Grumman’s new Space Systems division (NGSS). So statements made in 2020 could not be made by NGIS. [[User:Sidebart|Sidebart]] ([[User talk:Sidebart|talk]]) 23:36, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
| |||